So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 692
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by Jobu's Rum »

Genuinely asking...If Soriano was on waivers they couldnt just claim him like they did with Ramos? Pick up Soriano, option Granillo and drop one of those 3 who offer less potential and ceiling than Gran.

Was there something personal about Granillo they didnt like?


Are guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft that locked in to keep on the 40??
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1396
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
The Nard
Forum User
Posts: 639
Joined: 24 May 2024 06:37 am

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by The Nard »

As my birdie in the backyard explained,
“Cheap, cheap, cheap, cheap”.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:

It makes no sense...nobody wanted this garbage.

This is the fourth time he has changed organizations since November.

He landed with Baltimore, Atlanta and Washington via successive waiver claims and designations.

A veteran of parts of three seasons, Soriano has an earned run average just under 6.00 over 118 big league innings. He has a league average 22% strikeout rate against a moderately concerning 10.3% walk percentage. The biggest issue is that he has been very homer-prone, surrendering 1.75 longballs per nine innings. Soriano works in the 95-96 mph range with his sinker and four-seam fastball while using a slider and changeup fairly frequently. He’s out of minor league options and either needs to break camp or be sent back into DFA limbo.

It’s surprising that the Cardinals parted with Granillo for a pitcher who was waived three times in an offseason. They’re evidently not bullish on Granillo’s chances of translating his Triple-A production into success at the highest level. It’s also worth noting that they never had an opportunity to grab Soriano off waivers.

At least Granillo still had 2 options left.
Last edited by scoutyjones2 on 11 Feb 2026 18:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1396
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1396
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
I added stuff to my original post, that is backing my point.

Facts, not fawning
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
This is the fourth time he has changed organizations since November.

He landed with Baltimore, Atlanta and Washington via successive waiver claims and designations.

A veteran of parts of three seasons, Soriano has an earned run average just under 6.00 over 118 big league innings. He has a league average 22% strikeout rate against a moderately concerning 10.3% walk percentage. The biggest issue is that he has been very homer-prone, surrendering 1.75 longballs per nine innings. Soriano works in the 95-96 mph range with his sinker and four-seam fastball while using a slider and changeup fairly frequently. He’s out of minor league options and either needs to break camp or be sent back into DFA limbo.

It’s surprising that the Cardinals parted with Granillo for a pitcher who was waived three times in an offseason. They’re evidently not bullish on Granillo’s chances of translating his Triple-A production into success at the highest level. It’s also worth noting that they never had an opportunity to grab Soriano off waivers.

At least Granillo still had 2 options left.
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1396
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:54 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
I added stuff to my original post, that is backing my point.

Facts, not fawning
Please show where I was "fawning". You're so ridiculous dude.

Oh my god, I stated that I thought they probably saw something they liked in a pitcher, and they traded a true legend in Granillo to get him, so that means I'm fawning all over the new GM.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:57 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:54 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
I added stuff to my original post, that is backing my point.

Facts, not fawning
Please show where I was "fawning". You're so ridiculous dude.

Oh my god, I stated that I thought they probably saw something they liked in a pitcher, and they traded a true legend in Granillo to get him, so that means I'm fawning all over the new GM.
Yes you are. You stated, not guessed,

"They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team."

Bloomer

I posted why it makes no sense. Try to keep up
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1396
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 19:04 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:57 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:54 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
I added stuff to my original post, that is backing my point.

Facts, not fawning
Please show where I was "fawning". You're so ridiculous dude.

Oh my god, I stated that I thought they probably saw something they liked in a pitcher, and they traded a true legend in Granillo to get him, so that means I'm fawning all over the new GM.
Yes you are. You stated, not guessed,

"They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team."

Bloomer

I posted why it makes no sense. Try to keep up
I'm glad losing Andre Granillo has you so worked up. You're a joke dude. Have a good night.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 1558
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by Hoosier59 »

The thing most people are ignoring is the years of control! With all the trades that have been made, one of the arguments for these moves were the years of control that they gave the Cardinals. Now, that is being ignored. A real argument can be made as to which player is a better pitcher moving forward. I happen to believe Granillo will be, but regardless, he has remaining options and several years yet of control. No matter how you dice it, this trade makes no sense unless…..Granillo ruffled some feathers some how.
He did come across as somewhat arrogant And opinionated. Perhaps he said something that the Cardinals brass didn’t like.
It would be interesting to know, for sure what the “ real “ reason for this trade was!
peterman'srealitytour
Forum User
Posts: 403
Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by peterman'srealitytour »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Spot on. He must fit a profile or they see something that their pitching analytics guys like . How about we trust their judgment on this one? Is the sky really falling over the loss of Andre Granillo? God forbid we trade Packy Naughton.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 9442
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by scoutyjones2 »

cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 19:06 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 19:04 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:57 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:54 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:49 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:48 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:46 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 18:43 pm
cardinalsfever44 wrote: 11 Feb 2026 15:21 pm They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team. Another team likely snags up Soriano on waivers before the Cards get a chance, so they make the deal. Easy as that.

I don't understand all the heartburn over losing a guy like Granillo. Dude gave up over a hit an inning last year and posted a 4.71 ERA with a 1.38 WHIP and struck out 7 batters per 9 innings. Nothing special at all.
Now do Soraino last year :lol: :roll:
Please read my first sentence. Thanks!
And I call bull[shirt]. You're just a Bloomer.
Ok. Thanks for posting.
I added stuff to my original post, that is backing my point.

Facts, not fawning
Please show where I was "fawning". You're so ridiculous dude.

Oh my god, I stated that I thought they probably saw something they liked in a pitcher, and they traded a true legend in Granillo to get him, so that means I'm fawning all over the new GM.
Yes you are. You stated, not guessed,

"They saw something they liked in Soriano and don't see Granillo with a future on this team."

Bloomer

I posted why it makes no sense. Try to keep up
I'm glad losing Andre Granillo has you so worked up. You're a joke dude. Have a good night.
Sleep well...Bloomer. I knew you couldnt recute why my claim that it makes no sense, is correct
alw80
Forum User
Posts: 1330
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:50 pm

Re: So why Granillo, and not guys like Raquet, Pushard, Roycroft???

Post by alw80 »

Never seen anyone post about Granillo before he was traded but now people are panicking over what is going to end up being a nothing trade of two nobodies.
Post Reply