13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7013
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by ramfandan »

Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 15445
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
Voldemort
Forum User
Posts: 4073
Joined: 06 Aug 2022 18:21 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by Voldemort »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7013
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by ramfandan »

Voldemort wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:53 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
Yes, and the more top suspects drafted the better the odds that a few become good prospects. So having 6 suspects in top 86 better than having the usual 3
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 15445
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

Voldemort wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:53 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that-
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
Ha. If man is still alive.

Then I thought is was some wild double play combination?

Per prospects-and they are years away. But. Once a farm is established then the prospects will become more consistent good players. The more the merrier.
BrockFloodMaris
Forum User
Posts: 2940
Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by BrockFloodMaris »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 07:00 am
Voldemort wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:53 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that-
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
Ha. If man is still alive.

Then I thought is was some wild double play combination?

Per prospects-and they are years away. But. Once a farm is established then the prospects will become more consistent good players. The more the merrier.
Why can't Bloom guarantee the fans that all six of these picks will be MLB all stars next year? Come on Chaim! I thought you were a real POBO!
(Do I need to use blue font?)
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7013
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by ramfandan »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 07:00 am
Voldemort wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:53 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that-
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
Ha. If man is still alive.

Then I thought is was some wild double play combination?

Per prospects-and they are years away. But. Once a farm is established then the prospects will become more consistent good players. The more the merrier.
Agree with establishing a good farm system. That has been Bloom's thing at Tampa and Boston. One thing that I think gets a bit overblown is that the 'prospects are 'years away' ... has a connotation that the drafted kid may be in minors for 4 years , etc. Good players seem to move thru the systems much faster. A good college player rarely is in the minors too long these days .
tyoung12290
Forum User
Posts: 157
Joined: 12 Jun 2024 20:08 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by tyoung12290 »

Last year with 55 and 72 we got Mitchell and Franklin. Going to be a very exciting draft. Hope to add a rookie of the pear player promotion pick to the 27 draft!
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 15445
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 07:21 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 07:00 am
Voldemort wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:53 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that-
I thought that he was headed for "In the Year 2525." Of course, it would have taken some time to get there.

Per the picks, "Prospects ARE suspects until proven."
Ha. If man is still alive.

Then I thought is was some wild double play combination?

Per prospects-and they are years away. But. Once a farm is established then the prospects will become more consistent good players. The more the merrier.
Agree with establishing a good farm system. That has been Bloom's thing at Tampa and Boston. One thing that I think gets a bit overblown is that the 'prospects are 'years away' ... has a connotation that the drafted kid may be in minors for 4 years , etc. Good players seem to move thru the systems much faster. A good college player rarely is in the minors too long these days .
Yea you may be right- quicker movement. Makes sense- if we become a top notch farm, would seem some platers would emerge sooner, hence quicker movement onwards.
PadsFS07
Forum User
Posts: 317
Joined: 28 May 2024 08:54 am

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by PadsFS07 »

I remember we were in a similar situation in 2012 - 19 23 36 52 59 and 86

We did get Wacha Piscotty Wisdom and Kelly out of those picks, but I felt a bit robbed after all the hype leading up to it.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7013
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by ramfandan »

Every GM has 'misses' and 'hits' in drafting players whether MLB or NFL .

A Hall of Fame NFL GM Ron Wolf Green Bay Packers put it best years ago . A reporter was praising Wolf on his draft ability . In fact, the reporter said some of your 3rd round picks have made it big over your 1st rounders over the years.

Wolf replied, ' Every GM has players you 'miss ' on as well as ones you 'hit' on. The key is 'If you 'hit' more than you 'miss' , then you are doing your job pretty well I guess.

Same will be true for Bloom .
HorseTrader
Forum User
Posts: 2560
Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by HorseTrader »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
New soft drink to compete with Dr Pepper 10 2 4
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7013
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by ramfandan »

HorseTrader wrote: 04 Feb 2026 08:27 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
New soft drink to compete with Dr Pepper 10 2 4
Or those 6 numbers could designate the IQ scores of the worst posters on CT lol
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 15445
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 08:34 am
HorseTrader wrote: 04 Feb 2026 08:27 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:49 am
ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
I thought it might be a Chicago song, 25-6-4, something like that- ha.
New soft drink to compete with Dr Pepper 10 2 4
Or those 6 numbers could designate the IQ scores of the worst posters on CT lol
You got me there. My motto therefore is- if I can’t dazzle you with brilliance, I best baffle you with Bull [shirt].
Voldemort
Forum User
Posts: 4073
Joined: 06 Aug 2022 18:21 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by Voldemort »

To defend myself on my comments about prospects and suspects, Sidd Finch did not work out.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 3587
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: 13, 32, 50, 68, 72 , 86

Post by Carp4Cy »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Feb 2026 06:42 am Not this week's Powerball numbers but Bloom's draft picks in the Top 100 for 2026 draft. Anyone have any prospects/suspects for any of those selections ?
How many top 100 picks become top 100 prospects?

And how many top 100 prospects become top 100 MLB players as ranked by whoever put out the list last week?
Post Reply