Cardinals Ranked 9th
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
brock118
- Forum User
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm
Cardinals Ranked 9th
ESPN had their farm system rankings and had the Cardinals at 9th FWIW
7. Wetherholt
19. Rodriguez
50. Doyle
93. Baez
98. Bernal
They also had 101-200 rankings:
150 Quinn Mathews
179 Tink Hence
193 Branden Clarke and he was sighted as being the top guy in the bunch to be an elite closer
7. Wetherholt
19. Rodriguez
50. Doyle
93. Baez
98. Bernal
They also had 101-200 rankings:
150 Quinn Mathews
179 Tink Hence
193 Branden Clarke and he was sighted as being the top guy in the bunch to be an elite closer
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 16123
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
Hoosier59
- Forum User
- Posts: 1855
- Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
The first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 16123
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
First step is/was to re-build the farm system, this means from the ground up (hiring more coaches, instructors, health & welfare personnel, upgrading facilities, implementing a new system, ect....Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
Not sure why you mentioned Clarke.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Keith Law’s system rankings are out. He has the Cardinals ranked 11th.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/699828 ... ed_article
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/699828 ... ed_article
-
TheFantasyStud
- Forum User
- Posts: 363
- Joined: 27 May 2024 12:23 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
That’s crazy that we can be ranked #1 by one and number 9 and 11 by others. Wow. I had higher expectations for Clarke ranking as well. Hope he’s more than a closer.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Do you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 8993
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Surprisingly a lot of people do. They wanted to keep complimentary players with nothing for themBrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 13:35 pmDo you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
To compliment lol
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
And we see where he's going. No where.Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
What makes you think they'll be competitive after a few years? The reality is they traded away their best pitcher and their best hitter for next to nothing. Just dumping salary for now reason other than the owner wants to save his pocket change. They should have kept Gray and Contreras, then went out and got another top tier starter( maybe two) and a run producing outfielder. Then tell Walker and Noot they have to fight it out for playing time. Put Gorman at third and tell him if he strikes out a third of the time he'll be replaced at the all-star break. This team could have competed for a playoff spot if they'd done that. But they gutted the team in preparation for the CBA strike which will most likely happen and to position themselves better for the draft. A disgrace is what it is.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 13:35 pmDo you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
smilinjoefission
- Forum User
- Posts: 846
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
So Quinn Mathews went from a take notice 200K season to #150 prospect ranking? He's 25 so there really is no longer a reason to wait any longer on him.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 8993
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
But you think they would have been comparative after a few years if they kept arenado Contreras and gray lol. I mean sure you can they should have two all star and mvp level bats and a number one and two starter and all that who wouldn’t want that but it was never going to happen. And you actually think that telling Gorman and walker that they will suddenly be better as if they haven’t been trying? lol put down the bottleCCard wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 14:54 pmWhat makes you think they'll be competitive after a few years? The reality is they traded away their best pitcher and their best hitter for next to nothing. Just dumping salary for now reason other than the owner wants to save his pocket change. They should have kept Gray and Contreras, then went out and got another top tier starter( maybe two) and a run producing outfielder. Then tell Walker and Noot they have to fight it out for playing time. Put Gorman at third and tell him if he strikes out a third of the time he'll be replaced at the all-star break. This team could have competed for a playoff spot if they'd done that. But they gutted the team in preparation for the CBA strike which will most likely happen and to position themselves better for the draft. A disgrace is what it is.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 13:35 pmDo you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
TopofthePerch
- Forum User
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 17:33 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Some posters don't like the rebuild. They can just say that instead of refusing to look at the actual reality of the situation. Also they weren't salary dumps. They paid down contracts to get rid of declining assets that weren't going to b part of the core. They got four pitchers that are actually intriguing and these moves were viewed as good moves by anyone that covers baseball. By the way a pure salary dump was Arenado but not Gray and Contreras.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 15:28 pmBut you think they would have been comparative after a few years if they kept arenado Contreras and gray lol. I mean sure you can they should have two all star and mvp level bats and a number one and two starter and all that who wouldn’t want that but it was never going to happen. And you actually think that telling Gorman and walker that they will suddenly be better as if they haven’t been trying? lol put down the bottleCCard wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 14:54 pmWhat makes you think they'll be competitive after a few years? The reality is they traded away their best pitcher and their best hitter for next to nothing. Just dumping salary for now reason other than the owner wants to save his pocket change. They should have kept Gray and Contreras, then went out and got another top tier starter( maybe two) and a run producing outfielder. Then tell Walker and Noot they have to fight it out for playing time. Put Gorman at third and tell him if he strikes out a third of the time he'll be replaced at the all-star break. This team could have competed for a playoff spot if they'd done that. But they gutted the team in preparation for the CBA strike which will most likely happen and to position themselves better for the draft. A disgrace is what it is.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 13:35 pmDo you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system
-
zoiks
- Forum User
- Posts: 141
- Joined: 11 Oct 2022 03:40 am
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
The amount of people that don’t realize Dewitt has dumped as much salary as he can in order to protect his precious profit while the tv deal is in limbo is too darn high.
This is not a rebuild. The team has received 0 top 100 prospects and only 1 top 200 prospect from dumping salary. Dewitt has chosen to turn the team into a clone of the Royals, Twins, Reds, etc. - crying poor as a small market while pocketing 10’s of millions of dollars of guaranteed profit every year.
And sure, the team has JJ Wetherholt coming, but at the same time, 2 picks later in the draft the Pirates drafted what is considered to be a generational talent. So the team likely screwed up the Wetherholt pick too.
This is not a rebuild. The team has received 0 top 100 prospects and only 1 top 200 prospect from dumping salary. Dewitt has chosen to turn the team into a clone of the Royals, Twins, Reds, etc. - crying poor as a small market while pocketing 10’s of millions of dollars of guaranteed profit every year.
And sure, the team has JJ Wetherholt coming, but at the same time, 2 picks later in the draft the Pirates drafted what is considered to be a generational talent. So the team likely screwed up the Wetherholt pick too.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 8993
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Cardinals Ranked 9th
Oh I agree with you 100%TopofthePerch wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 18:03 pmSome posters don't like the rebuild. They can just say that instead of refusing to look at the actual reality of the situation. Also they weren't salary dumps. They paid down contracts to get rid of declining assets that weren't going to b part of the core. They got four pitchers that are actually intriguing and these moves were viewed as good moves by anyone that covers baseball. By the way a pure salary dump was Arenado but not Gray and Contreras.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 15:28 pmBut you think they would have been comparative after a few years if they kept arenado Contreras and gray lol. I mean sure you can they should have two all star and mvp level bats and a number one and two starter and all that who wouldn’t want that but it was never going to happen. And you actually think that telling Gorman and walker that they will suddenly be better as if they haven’t been trying? lol put down the bottleCCard wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 14:54 pmWhat makes you think they'll be competitive after a few years? The reality is they traded away their best pitcher and their best hitter for next to nothing. Just dumping salary for now reason other than the owner wants to save his pocket change. They should have kept Gray and Contreras, then went out and got another top tier starter( maybe two) and a run producing outfielder. Then tell Walker and Noot they have to fight it out for playing time. Put Gorman at third and tell him if he strikes out a third of the time he'll be replaced at the all-star break. This team could have competed for a playoff spot if they'd done that. But they gutted the team in preparation for the CBA strike which will most likely happen and to position themselves better for the draft. A disgrace is what it is.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 13:35 pmDo you think it would have been better to keep Gray, WC and Nado around during a couple more non competitive years, clogging up the roster and keeping us in the sustained mediocrity that Mo made his legacy?Hoosier59 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:32 pmThe first step was cutting payroll! Clarke is the only one on the list that wasn't already in the Cardinals system.rockondlouie wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026 12:20 pm Nice
First step in this re-tool is to build up the farm system