Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Cardly
Forum User
Posts: 202
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:17 pm

Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Cardly »

I get the youth movement.

With that, the innings are many and the proven arms are few.

Thoughts:
Sign Quintana - trade at deadline
Sign Montgomery - don’t trade this season but he will be ready to pitch mid season and could cover innings later in the season.
Sign Andrew Chafin - trade at the deadline.

Trade Romero NOW - get a decent prospect
Add a legit righty bat who can hit lefties.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Cardly wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:27 pm I get the youth movement.

With that, the innings are many and the proven arms are few.

Thoughts:
Sign Quintana - trade at deadline
Sign Montgomery - don’t trade this season but he will be ready to pitch mid season and could cover innings later in the season.
Sign Andrew Chafin - trade at the deadline.

Trade Romero NOW - get a decent prospect
Add a legit righty bat who can hit lefties.
This is the play.
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 614
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 526
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by brock118 »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 614
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 3587
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Carp4Cy »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:44 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Agree. But I’d take it one step further. If we could identify the right player and they are available I’d go ahead and sign or trade/sign them longterm. We’ve dumped all the 30 somethings with large contracts so backfilling is a big part of what comes next. Only so much adding can feasibly be done each off-season so starting now with the right core player could be wise.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
The players listed are probably looking at contracts for half the amounts you cite.
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 614
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:01 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:44 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Agree. But I’d take it one step further. If we could identify the right player and they are available I’d go ahead and sign or trade/sign them longterm. We’ve dumped all the 30 somethings with large contracts so backfilling is a big part of what comes next. Only so much adding can feasibly be done each off-season so starting now with the right core player could be wise.
I don't disagree. I just don't think the Cardinals are interested in signing anyone (including extending their own) until the new CBA is in place. Trading for, possibly under very favorable circumstances, but unlikely.

Not saying I agree with that policy (if it is indeed the case), just that I think it is, so I'm not wasting any time expecting or hoping it happens.
Cardly
Forum User
Posts: 202
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:17 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Cardly »

It seems they could sign Montgomery to a lower dollar this season and a higher amount for year 2. They could trade him at the deadline in 2026. Sort of like the May.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 3587
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Carp4Cy »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:07 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:01 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:44 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Agree. But I’d take it one step further. If we could identify the right player and they are available I’d go ahead and sign or trade/sign them longterm. We’ve dumped all the 30 somethings with large contracts so backfilling is a big part of what comes next. Only so much adding can feasibly be done each off-season so starting now with the right core player could be wise.
I don't disagree. I just don't think the Cardinals are interested in signing anyone (including extending their own) until the new CBA is in place. Trading for, possibly under very favorable circumstances, but unlikely.

Not saying I agree with that policy (if it is indeed the case), just that I think it is, so I'm not wasting any time expecting or hoping it happens.
Probably true. But I’d say this CBA negotiation has happened to come along at the absolute worst time to maximize dragging out the actual building part of our rebuild.

Meanwhile other teams will make bets on the future and might benefit at our future expense.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 7868
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
The cardinals would be a good landing spot for several pitchers. A pitcher looking to reestablish his value could do worse than sign with a team that has a very pitcher friendly home ball park also knowing they would most likely be traded at the deadline to a contender anyway.
KeeptheRamsinSTL
Forum User
Posts: 248
Joined: 25 May 2024 11:10 am

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by KeeptheRamsinSTL »

Cardly wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:27 pm I get the youth movement.

With that, the innings are many and the proven arms are few.

Thoughts:
Sign Quintana - trade at deadline
Sign Montgomery - don’t trade this season but he will be ready to pitch mid season and could cover innings later in the season.
Sign Andrew Chafin - trade at the deadline.

Trade Romero NOW - get a decent prospect
Add a legit righty bat who can hit lefties.
What about Max Scherzer? He is very near the end of his career but he grew up a Cardinals fan. This would give him a chance to play for his hometown team. He would bring good PR to the Cardinals/DeWitts. His signing would encourage fans to return. Scherzer would a good veteran to help this young staff. Busch Stadium is a friendly park for pitchers.

I understand that Scherzer most likely wants to go to a contender but he remains unsigned. Bloom could offer him a deal and let him know that if the Cardinals are not in contention at the trade deadline that he would try to trade him to a contender that Scherzer would be interested in.
Clubmaker2
Forum User
Posts: 1954
Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Clubmaker2 »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:14 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:07 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:01 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:44 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Agree. But I’d take it one step further. If we could identify the right player and they are available I’d go ahead and sign or trade/sign them longterm. We’ve dumped all the 30 somethings with large contracts so backfilling is a big part of what comes next. Only so much adding can feasibly be done each off-season so starting now with the right core player could be wise.
I don't disagree. I just don't think the Cardinals are interested in signing anyone (including extending their own) until the new CBA is in place. Trading for, possibly under very favorable circumstances, but unlikely.

Not saying I agree with that policy (if it is indeed the case), just that I think it is, so I'm not wasting any time expecting or hoping it happens.
Probably true. But I’d say this CBA negotiation has happened to come along at the absolute worst time to maximize dragging out the actual building part of our rebuild.

Meanwhile other teams will make bets on the future and might benefit at our future expense.
Unfortunate or where Bill likes it? He kept Mo a year everyone knew he should have been gone...
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 614
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:14 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:07 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:01 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:44 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:39 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:32 pm I don't have an issue with any of that and those players seem like they would be exactly what the Cardinals are looking for (re: short term, reasonably priced).

The only question is are the Cardinals what they are looking for? They are likely looking for a team in better position to win and won't sign until they're reasonably sure that offer isn't out there.
Agreed, with so many teams looking for pitching that actually have a chance at the playoffs, I don't see why they would want to sign with us. Plus we are looking to slash payroll drastically and I'm not sure we would go to what it takes to sign these guys. I would be surprised if we sign anyone for more than $6-8 million.
I can see them pay a higher price for one year, assuming the pitcher in question is agreeable.

Edit: I'm not a doom and gloom salary guy. I think they'll be willing to spend on one year deals, if they can find a decent candidate to spend it on (easily flippable).
Agree. But I’d take it one step further. If we could identify the right player and they are available I’d go ahead and sign or trade/sign them longterm. We’ve dumped all the 30 somethings with large contracts so backfilling is a big part of what comes next. Only so much adding can feasibly be done each off-season so starting now with the right core player could be wise.
I don't disagree. I just don't think the Cardinals are interested in signing anyone (including extending their own) until the new CBA is in place. Trading for, possibly under very favorable circumstances, but unlikely.

Not saying I agree with that policy (if it is indeed the case), just that I think it is, so I'm not wasting any time expecting or hoping it happens.
Probably true. But I’d say this CBA negotiation has happened to come along at the absolute worst time to maximize dragging out the actual building part of our rebuild.

Meanwhile other teams will make bets on the future and might benefit at our future expense.
Agree on the timing.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 5433
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by Cardinals4Life »

KeeptheRamsinSTL wrote: 25 Jan 2026 14:58 pm
Cardly wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:27 pm I get the youth movement.

With that, the innings are many and the proven arms are few.

Thoughts:
Sign Quintana - trade at deadline
Sign Montgomery - don’t trade this season but he will be ready to pitch mid season and could cover innings later in the season.
Sign Andrew Chafin - trade at the deadline.

Trade Romero NOW - get a decent prospect
Add a legit righty bat who can hit lefties.
What about Max Scherzer? He is very near the end of his career but he grew up a Cardinals fan. This would give him a chance to play for his hometown team. He would bring good PR to the Cardinals/DeWitts. His signing would encourage fans to return. Scherzer would a good veteran to help this young staff. Busch Stadium is a friendly park for pitchers.

I understand that Scherzer most likely wants to go to a contender but he remains unsigned. Bloom could offer him a deal and let him know that if the Cardinals are not in contention at the trade deadline that he would try to trade him to a contender that Scherzer would be interested in.
Scherzer becomes more interesting each passing week.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 2175
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: Quintana, Montgomery and Chafin

Post by CCard »

Cardly wrote: 25 Jan 2026 13:27 pm I get the youth movement.

With that, the innings are many and the proven arms are few.

Thoughts:
Sign Quintana - trade at deadline
Sign Montgomery - don’t trade this season but he will be ready to pitch mid season and could cover innings later in the season.
Sign Andrew Chafin - trade at the deadline.

Trade Romero NOW - get a decent prospect
Add a legit righty bat who can hit lefties.
Quintana....Maybe, but his sell by date is probably come and gone.
Montgomery...No
Chafin...Purely as a reliever he might be okay. WHIP not bad but he is 35

Trade Romero? Why? A good lefty reliever. Why trade him at all? In fact, extend him.
Adding a righty bat could help but if they aren't going to go get good pitching it's a waste.
Post Reply