Andersson to Vegas
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Andersson to Vegas
Looks like it's Vegas who ends up with Andersson per EF.
The return is from what I saw Whitecloud, 27 1st, 27 2nd (changes to a 1st if Vegas wins cup, Abraim Weibe
**edit - didn't see anything right away on any salary potentially retained by Calgary
The return is from what I saw Whitecloud, 27 1st, 27 2nd (changes to a 1st if Vegas wins cup, Abraim Weibe
**edit - didn't see anything right away on any salary potentially retained by Calgary
Last edited by 93 on 18 Jan 2026 16:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Backesdraft
- Forum User
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 15 Mar 2019 07:23 am
Re: Andersson to Vegas
I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a franchise more than the a knights. It’s not the winning really, it’s the constant skirting of the rules and the NHL’s willingness (especially early in Vegas’s history) to turn the other cheek.
-
BleedingBleu
- Forum User
- Posts: 545
- Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Last edited by BleedingBleu on 18 Jan 2026 16:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Love Vegas’ commitment.
Great GMing out there
Great GMing out there
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Andersson to Vegas
He wanted to play in Vegas and he held all the cards. Can’t really fault Vegas for that.Backesdraft wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 16:51 pm I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a franchise more than the a knights. It’s not the winning really, it’s the constant skirting of the rules and the NHL’s willingness (especially early in Vegas’s history) to turn the other cheek.
-
Backesdraft
- Forum User
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 15 Mar 2019 07:23 am
Re: Andersson to Vegas
At what point is the league complicit though? They have half a dozen teams playing at what has become a huge advantage with the taxes. Not to mention teams (Vegas being not the only culprit here but the most unrepentant and obvious offender) completely circumventing the salary cap. Yes, the league has finally put a stopgap in place this year on the fake injuries but only after years of Vegas and Florida and TB and Colorado working around the rules to win cups.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 17:04 pmHe wanted to play in Vegas and he held all the cards. Can’t really fault Vegas for that.Backesdraft wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 16:51 pm I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a franchise more than the a knights. It’s not the winning really, it’s the constant skirting of the rules and the NHL’s willingness (especially early in Vegas’s history) to turn the other cheek.
Wanna bet that Vegas gets Panarin too?
In a vacuum I don’t really care about Rasmus A. having some say in where he goes but when the majority of players (who ARE in a position to determine their own future) pick between 5 or 6 teams only, that’s a problem.
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Armstrong has nothing but good things to say about their organization and has handed out many compliments.Backesdraft wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 17:35 pmAt what point is the league complicit though? They have half a dozen teams playing at what has become a huge advantage with the taxes. Not to mention teams (Vegas being not the only culprit here but the most unrepentant and obvious offender) completely circumventing the salary cap. Yes, the league has finally put a stopgap in place this year on the fake injuries but only after years of Vegas and Florida and TB and Colorado working around the rules to win cups.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 17:04 pmHe wanted to play in Vegas and he held all the cards. Can’t really fault Vegas for that.Backesdraft wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 16:51 pm I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a franchise more than the a knights. It’s not the winning really, it’s the constant skirting of the rules and the NHL’s willingness (especially early in Vegas’s history) to turn the other cheek.
Wanna bet that Vegas gets Panarin too?
In a vacuum I don’t really care about Rasmus A. having some say in where he goes but when the majority of players (who ARE in a position to determine their own future) pick between 5 or 6 teams only, that’s a problem.
Does that anger you? Is he lying? Does he just not get it?
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Vegas comes in and just clowns the rest of the league. I wish the Blues were this committed to icing winning teams
-
Frank Underwood
- Forum User
- Posts: 972
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Andersson to Vegas
I like Whitecloud, so that’s a pretty reasonable trade for Calgary under the circumstances.
Re: Andersson to Vegas
-
IsDurbanodoingtime
- Forum User
- Posts: 865
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
Re: Andersson to Vegas
I don't see it that way. In the short term they did not add a right handed d man they upgraded (by not that much in their top 4) switching out whitecloud and then gave up a first, a second and a d prispect. Was the differential between whitecloud and andersson worth it? Is it going to get them past Colorado? If they sign him, he is I guess Petro's replacement.
Re: Andersson to Vegas
It’s a team in general that will do anything to improve. They don’t give a (bleep) about firsts and honestly I’ve been saying for a long time they are highly overrated by most. Unless it’s a top 10 pick, I’d trade it for a sure thing known commodity almost every timeIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 18:22 pmI don't see it that way. In the short term they did not add a right handed d man they upgraded (by not that much in their top 4) switching out whitecloud and then gave up a first, a second and a d prispect. Was the differential between whitecloud and andersson worth it? Is it going to get them past Colorado? If they sign him, he is I guess Petro's replacement.
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Yup. Andersson gives them lots of options, brings offense and personality. Blocks a lot of shots and committed. Another guy that can can play 23+ minutes if need be. Marner wasn’t enough and they needed to try and plug some of Pietrangelo’s hole.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 18:24 pmIt’s a team in general that will do anything to improve. They don’t give a (bleep) about firsts and honestly I’ve been saying for a long time they are highly overrated by most. Unless it’s a top 10 pick, I’d trade it for a sure thing known commodity almost every timeIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 18:22 pmI don't see it that way. In the short term they did not add a right handed d man they upgraded (by not that much in their top 4) switching out whitecloud and then gave up a first, a second and a d prispect. Was the differential between whitecloud and andersson worth it? Is it going to get them past Colorado? If they sign him, he is I guess Petro's replacement.
Whether it works out or not…at least they are committed to beating the Lanche and have a very high quality product.
Great GMing
Re: Andersson to Vegas
Vegas makes huge trades and signings every year doing everything they can to improve. Players want to sign there because of it. We get to watch Sunny on the powerplay.
-
IsDurbanodoingtime
- Forum User
- Posts: 865
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
Re: Andersson to Vegas
I guess. But query how many cups did vegas win with patches? And how quick would they do a do over for the suzuki trade?MiamiLaw wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 18:24 pmIt’s a team in general that will do anything to improve. They don’t give a (bleep) about firsts and honestly I’ve been saying for a long time they are highly overrated by most. Unless it’s a top 10 pick, I’d trade it for a sure thing known commodity almost every timeIsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026 18:22 pmI don't see it that way. In the short term they did not add a right handed d man they upgraded (by not that much in their top 4) switching out whitecloud and then gave up a first, a second and a d prispect. Was the differential between whitecloud and andersson worth it? Is it going to get them past Colorado? If they sign him, he is I guess Petro's replacement.
