Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Alex Reyes Cy Young
- Forum User
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am
Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
I'm a little surprised that we haven't heard a peep of a rumor about trading a catcher this offseason.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14511
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
If we traded Donovan and a catcher, that would be a nice deal for another team, and maybe sweeten it enough for us to land.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
-
Alex Reyes Cy Young
- Forum User
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
It has the DNA of Moe in some regards.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:41 am I'm a little surprised that we haven't heard a peep of a rumor about trading a catcher this offseason.
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
Maybe Bloom is playing it close to the vest.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:41 am I'm a little surprised that we haven't heard a peep of a rumor about trading a catcher this offseason.
Catcher and SS are two premium positions.
You and I won’t be surprised if a catcher is part of a deal.
Last edited by ramfandan on 28 Dec 2025 09:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alex Reyes Cy Young
- Forum User
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
That gives you a sub super on a good team and a top flight prospect who profiles into a critical position. What's not to like from the receiving team?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:45 amIf we traded Donovan and a catcher, that would be a nice deal for another team, and maybe sweeten it enough for us to land.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
I’m okay with letting the catcher situation shake out a bit…
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
You rightly list 6 catchers presently. When I think about the catchers beyond this year, I don't think of Herrera and Rodriguez as catchers. I think they will change positions. I don't worry about Pozo in the mix. He's great to have as depth. If we have 2 ML catchers and he is at AAA, I would be really glad to have him on the big league roster in case of injury.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
I see Bernal as the catcher of the future whenever he is ready.
So the two I see as possible trade pieces are Pages and Crooks. They have about the same trade value, but teams may have a preference based on experience, or handedness with the bat. It seems one of these two could/should be traded.
-
CorneliusWolfe
- Forum User
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
-
An Old Friend
- Forum User
- Posts: 13466
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
Catcher has one of the highest bust rates in baseball. There is very little log jam. Neither Pages or Pozo will stand in the way of Bernal. Bernal is only turning 22 in February. He shouldn't be in any conversation for 2026, with an earliest ETA of 2027. Rodriguez is much younger, so you don't need to solve for him, either.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
They can have one of Crooks / Pages / Pozo in a platoon with Bernal at AAA with the other 2 in the majors. If Herrera can catch, one of Pages / Pozo becomes fodder... they have very little value on the market.
If Herrera can catch 40-50 games and DH the rest... great. Use 2026 to figure that out. The nice part is that they have proximal depth to let that play out.
Bernal might be the major league starter in 2027 or 2028 assuming he hits at AAA.
Rodriguez you don't need to plan for yet - he should develop without concern about the players at AAA / MLB.
-
Red Bird Classic
- Forum User
- Posts: 726
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:52 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
Sounds about right:Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:54 amYou rightly list 6 catchers presently. When I think about the catchers beyond this year, I don't think of Herrera and Rodriguez as catchers. I think they will change positions. I don't worry about Pozo in the mix. He's great to have as depth. If we have 2 ML catchers and he is at AAA, I would be really glad to have him on the big league roster in case of injury.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
I see Bernal as the catcher of the future whenever he is ready.
So the two I see as possible trade pieces are Pages and Crooks. They have about the same trade value, but teams may have a preference based on experience, or handedness with the bat. It seems one of these two could/should be traded.
Pages/Pozo solid backups likely.
Herrera I can’t see sticking at Catcher.
Crooks just arrived and needs to show more.
Bernal I agree has the best potential due to balance between offense/defense.
Rodriguez likely has the best bat and could move.
Good analysis
-
An Old Friend
- Forum User
- Posts: 13466
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
Yep. 2026 provides an easy evaluation year for Herrera and Crooks, specifically. Pages and Pozo are just temporary filler.
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
...and age, and developmental timeline.Cusecards wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 10:33 amSounds about right:Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:54 amYou rightly list 6 catchers presently. When I think about the catchers beyond this year, I don't think of Herrera and Rodriguez as catchers. I think they will change positions. I don't worry about Pozo in the mix. He's great to have as depth. If we have 2 ML catchers and he is at AAA, I would be really glad to have him on the big league roster in case of injury.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.
I see Bernal as the catcher of the future whenever he is ready.
So the two I see as possible trade pieces are Pages and Crooks. They have about the same trade value, but teams may have a preference based on experience, or handedness with the bat. It seems one of these two could/should be traded.
Pages/Pozo solid backups likely.
Herrera I can’t see sticking at Catcher.
Crooks just arrived and needs to show more.
Bernal I agree has the best potential due to balance between offense/defense.
Rodriguez likely has the best bat and could move.
Good analysis
Re: Why not trade from surplus (catcher)?
agree with you ARCYAlex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025 09:39 am In particular catcher?
Pages and Pozos (limited if anything)
Hererra (some desperate team potentially giving him a chance as secondary catcher who can hit at DH and potentially other positions)
Crooks, Bernal, Rodriguez.
There are a lot of catchers at the top. Obviously a critical position so you want to hold onto 1-2 but I would think moving a controlled highly touted catching prospect (if done correctly), could fetch you a player of similar upside that fills a position of need.