Future pitching
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Future pitching
By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 7000
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Future pitching
Tanner Franklin is considered high upside alsoC-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
-
hugeCardfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm
Re: Future pitching
Not sure why Tanner Franklin was left out of this equation, but, this is what TCN had to say about him:C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
His FB is ML quality running upwards of 102, sitting upper 90's. His cutter was the highest velocity in NCAA last year at 93 mph. His slider/curve has significant vertical and horizontal movement. He could be a fast riser. His make up is exciting and at 6'5" he looks every bit the part.Franklin is a special talent that the Cardinals organization spent years seemingly immune to. The big righty is meant to be on the mound, and he employs two pitches that are at least above average right now and one pitch that is elite, capable of carrying the rest. If Franklin can build up innings, develop more of a changeup, and live on the fringes of the zone then he’ll be a rotation mainstay in the near and foreseeable future. If not, then he’s at least a backend of the bullpen piece who will fire up a fanbase.
Re: Future pitching
Mathews, Hjerpe, and Roby are exciting possibilities.hugeCardfan wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 22:15 pmNot sure why Tanner Franklin was left out of this equation, but, this is what TCN had to say about him:C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
His FB is ML quality running upwards of 102, sitting upper 90's. His cutter was the highest velocity in NCAA last year at 93 mph. His slider/curve has significant vertical and horizontal movement. He could be a fast riser. His make up is exciting and at 6'5" he looks every bit the part.Franklin is a special talent that the Cardinals organization spent years seemingly immune to. The big righty is meant to be on the mound, and he employs two pitches that are at least above average right now and one pitch that is elite, capable of carrying the rest. If Franklin can build up innings, develop more of a changeup, and live on the fringes of the zone then he’ll be a rotation mainstay in the near and foreseeable future. If not, then he’s at least a backend of the bullpen piece who will fire up a fanbase.
-
hornetfb52
- Forum User
- Posts: 160
- Joined: 24 May 2024 19:09 pm
Re: Future pitching
Matthews to tier B is my main argument. Hjerpe and Hence need to begin their trek to the bullpen.
Re: Future pitching
Thanks, I appreciate all the names people will add. Sounds like he belongs in Tier E.hugeCardfan wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 22:15 pmNot sure why Tanner Franklin was left out of this equation, but, this is what TCN had to say about him:C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
His FB is ML quality running upwards of 102, sitting upper 90's. His cutter was the highest velocity in NCAA last year at 93 mph. His slider/curve has significant vertical and horizontal movement. He could be a fast riser. His make up is exciting and at 6'5" he looks every bit the part.Franklin is a special talent that the Cardinals organization spent years seemingly immune to. The big righty is meant to be on the mound, and he employs two pitches that are at least above average right now and one pitch that is elite, capable of carrying the rest. If Franklin can build up innings, develop more of a changeup, and live on the fringes of the zone then he’ll be a rotation mainstay in the near and foreseeable future. If not, then he’s at least a backend of the bullpen piece who will fire up a fanbase.
Re: Future pitching
I am hoping Libby can be a 1 or 2. He made some improvement last year.
Re: Future pitching
It really is impossible to predict with any accuracy where these guys wind up. Look how far Hence has fallen
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13676
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Future pitching
Good stuff, nice break down C-U!C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
C. Bloom has already done a great job landing some young, power arms that have some big upside potential IF they develop.
The odds are against the majority of them but if he hits on two or three who end up in the 2027-2028 SR w/one a #2 or higher, then he's well ahead in the re-build.
Then
Next up.........re-building the sorry, sorry outfield.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14412
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Future pitching
C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
Have you noticed. The Dodgers big claims to fame is their endless pitching staff. They have more pitchers on the IL than we do the staff.
Bloom is collecting pitchers. He’s following the Dodgers model. Saturation. Doesn’t matter their pedigree, what matters is a healthy arm.
I see this as clear as the driven snow.
-
moose-and-squirrel
- Forum User
- Posts: 5999
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: Future pitching
Or how good a pitcher can get with increased velocity, further developed secondary pitches, etc. How about a Cardinal prospect in 2017 who had an ERA of 4.31 and WHIP of 1.428 at Springfield? Gave up a hit per inning and struck out only 106 in 125 innings. Wasn’t considered a top pitching prospect in the season?
Re: Future pitching
True. And in this case it COULD have been predicted because of his size. In fact It was mentioned by some sources. But he was still highly ranked.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:04 amhence has fallen because of one ability.. availability
Re: Future pitching
Interesting breakdown and appreciate the effort!C-Unit wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025 21:27 pm By 2027-28, where could we stand?
Here's how I see it:
____________________________
Tier A (potential top of rotation starters):
- Doyle
Tier B (potential #3-5 starters):
- Liberatore
- McGreevy
- Fitts
- Dobbins
Tier C (mlb wildcards):
- May
---------
Tier D (minor league potential SP):
- Mautz
- Henderson
- Hansen
- Bedell
Tier E (minor league high ceiling arms):
- Brandon Clarke
- Fajardo
- Chen Wei-Lin
____________________________
Tier F (controllable relievers):
- O'Brien
- Svanson
- Graceffo
- Raquet?
- Pushard?
- Fernandez?
Tier G (minor league potential RP):
- Granillo
- Shuster
- Gastelum
- Findlay
______________________________
Tier H (minor league wildcards):
- Mathews
- Hjerpe
- Roby
- Hence
______________________________
Let's see:
- I'm sure I could have rattled off more names for Tier D (or Tier G).
- In Tier E, I see these as pitchers who it would be a bonus if they developed as SP, but they have good enough stuff that they should be effective anyway in an MLB pen one day. And it may be a likely outcome for them.
- In Tier H, my basecase is if we ever receive MLB contributions from 1 or 2 of these names we would be very fortunate. As Hjerpe and Roby come back from TJ, I keep a candle lit that one or both might become an effective reliever with their power stuff, similar to the pitchers in Tier E). I included Mathews in this group only because of how off he was last year with all the walks and the hinting of shoulder issues. It just does not sound like a sure thing at all with him, which is a shame.
It's a very rough list and names could be moved to other categories. But my bottomline is that by 2027-28, there seems to be a good spread of names, many with very high ceiling, that could indiscriminately serve to fillout various roles both rotation and bullpen. We might be very pleased. We may find ourselves a #2 starter (trade or sign) away from having a very outstanding pitching staff.
Fun stuff to think about/discuss as opposed to the gloom/doom/whining.
-
hugeCardfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm
Re: Future pitching
Was that Sandy?Cranny wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:49 amOr how good a pitcher can get with increased velocity, further developed secondary pitches, etc. How about a Cardinal prospect in 2017 who had an ERA of 4.31 and WHIP of 1.428 at Springfield? Gave up a hit per inning and struck out only 106 in 125 innings. Wasn’t considered a top pitching prospect in the season?