STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1518844
You’ve already done this thread topic. Numerous times.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
Starting to wonder about his mental wellness! Maybe a cognitive test would help?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:24 pmYou’ve already done this thread topic. Numerous times.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
viewtopic.php?t=1518788
viewtopic.php?t=1518661
viewtopic.php?t=1518571
viewtopic.php?t=1518479
viewtopic.php?t=1518161
viewtopic.php?t=1518030
Like the guy who went to his long term Dr. and was asked , 'When was the last time I gave you a Cognitive Test ? Patient" Beats me , doc ! I don't remember taking one ever and BTW don't remember seeing you before either . Thought I came here for a dental appt. today .zuck698 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:25 pmStarting to wonder about his mental wellness! Maybe a cognitive test would help?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:24 pmYou’ve already done this thread topic. Numerous times.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
viewtopic.php?t=1518788
viewtopic.php?t=1518661
viewtopic.php?t=1518571
viewtopic.php?t=1518479
viewtopic.php?t=1518161
viewtopic.php?t=1518030
Could offering Crooks or Bernal as part of a deal help get a comparable outfield talent? Considering both are fairly highly rated young catchers. That might be an option in order to keep Donovan around.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
I feel like at this point, you are consciously trolling.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:30 pmCould offering Crooks or Bernal as part of a deal help get a comparable outfield talent? Considering both are fairly highly rated young catchers. That might be an option in order to keep Donovan around.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
Lol. Surely not Shady? He brings nothing but top notch posts and ideas hereecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:33 pmI feel like at this point, you are consciously trolling.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:30 pmCould offering Crooks or Bernal as part of a deal help get a comparable outfield talent? Considering both are fairly highly rated young catchers. That might be an option in order to keep Donovan around.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
And many of them, several times over! 
Why are you interested it keep a middle of the road player that will be too old or too expensive by time this team is any good?Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:30 pmCould offering Crooks or Bernal as part of a deal help get a comparable outfield talent? Considering both are fairly highly rated young catchers. That might be an option in order to keep Donovan around.Shady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
Sure. Please post the same things over and over again Shady. Apparently you have fans that like it.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.
Thank you. "Add foe" is a wonderful feature that some aren't aware enough to use. Sooner or later, I hope somebody responds to the suggestion of, possibly, trading a top ten prospect catcher for maybe a top ten prospect outfielder. It makes sense to me with the overabundance of catchers the Cardinals have.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.
Like I said, why respond with a non-baseball response? Is it necessary?zuck698 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:50 pmSure. Please post the same things over and over again Shady. Apparently you have fans that like it.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.
Shut up BoboShady wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:11 pm After helping the starting pitching situation. Obviously, his focus should now be getting help for the outfield. Be nice to do that, somehow, without trading Donovan. Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B would make for fine infield for quite a few years tp come..
Neither of your posts are baseball related...(bleep)Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:52 pmLike I said, why respond with a non-baseball response? Is it necessary?zuck698 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:50 pmSure. Please post the same things over and over again Shady. Apparently you have fans that like it.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.
Look at the second posting under the O.P.. That tells the story. Is it necessary to post the same subject over and over again? Many of us here have asked him repeatedly to refrain from doing so. But if you like it, good for you. Or could this be one of the many alter egos of said poster? Hmmm....Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:52 pmLike I said, why respond with a non-baseball response? Is it necessary?zuck698 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:50 pmSure. Please post the same things over and over again Shady. Apparently you have fans that like it.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.
Just a sock covering a sock. Nothing to see here!scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:56 pmNeither of your posts are baseball related...(bleep)Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:52 pmLike I said, why respond with a non-baseball response? Is it necessary?zuck698 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:50 pmSure. Please post the same things over and over again Shady. Apparently you have fans that like it.Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 21:47 pm If people don’t like this guy’s post, it’s really easy not to answer him.
At least it’s about baseball.
Post some more, Shady. Your trade ideas are as good as anybody else’s.