STLtoday.com

Stop. MSN posts dont count as legitimate

Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Cusecards wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:22 am Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

They would have interest. He would play the same positions for them that he plays for us.

I see a beggar man done found himself some wine.

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:24 am Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

That would be perfect for the Mariners: first sign Josh Naylor to a 5-yr FA contract, then trade for Naylor-Lite.

Shady wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:26 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:24 am Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:28 am

Shady wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:26 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:24 am Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

craviduce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:31 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:28 am

Shady wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:26 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:24 am Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

That is what I'm saying- and I agree, it's Sloan +

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:38 am

craviduce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:31 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:28 am

Shady wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:26 am

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:24 am Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

That is what I'm saying- and I agree, it's Sloan +

I’d try for Logan Gilbert

Lost me when the writer said the Cards didn't need to sell low on Donovan. Low? That makes no sense. 2 years of control great defense, good offense, where is the LOW at? Shady, tell the truth did you write that article?

Shady wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:14 am https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topst ... e37b&ei=13

Shut up Bobo

HorseTrader wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:43 am Lost me when the writer said the Cards didn't need to sell low on Donovan. Low? That makes no sense. 2 years of control great defense, good offense, where is the LOW at? Shady, tell the truth did you write that article?

Hurdy doesn't have great defense...

Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:25 am

Cusecards wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:22 am Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

They would have interest. He would play the same positions for them that he plays for us.

Could be...although with the Naylor signing scratch Burleson for 1B.
So that leaves OF/DH.
Not that the Mariners wouldn’t like to have Burleson but I just don’t see the fit where they would part with a significant pitcher.
Maybe with Burleson part of a package but that is a whole different thread.
To be honest the OP is famous for starting these kind of threads.
I consider it mostly a need for attention as he is also famous for starting repetitive threads daily.
And considering his Burleson fixation I find it even more strange.