What kind of starting pitching would the Mariners give for Burleson?

[Shady]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topst ... e37b&ei=13

[Adam2]

Stop. MSN posts dont count as legitimate

[Cusecards]

Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

[Talkin' Baseball]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

[Talkin' Baseball]

Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

They would have interest. He would play the same positions for them that he plays for us.

[sikeston bulldog2]

I see a beggar man done found himself some wine.

[Shady]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

[NYCardsFan]

That would be perfect for the Mariners: first sign Josh Naylor to a 5-yr FA contract, then trade for Naylor-Lite.

[Talkin' Baseball]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

[craviduce]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

[Talkin' Baseball]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

That is what I'm saying- and I agree, it's Sloan +

[Galatians221jb1]

Not: Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Woo, Miller, Anderson, Sloan

Possibly; Cijntje, Logan Evans, Emerson Hancock

I am 100% not opposed to trading Burleson, but I wouldn't trade him to Seattle for less than Ryan Sloan. I don't think they will do that, so that makes a match difficult.

Which of those Nots might the Cardinals get for Donovan instead?

Maybe Sloan, but I doubt if they are going to part with him for anyone.

you're saying they're overly stingy with their own prospects?

I agree if that's what you're saying.

I do feel Donovan is worth a Sloan...and a little more if we're being fair.

That is what I'm saying- and I agree, it's Sloan +

I’d try for Logan Gilbert

[HorseTrader]

Lost me when the writer said the Cards didn't need to sell low on Donovan. Low? That makes no sense. 2 years of control great defense, good offense, where is the LOW at? Shady, tell the truth did you write that article?

[scoutyjones2]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topst ... e37b&ei=13

Shut up Bobo

[scoutyjones2]

Lost me when the writer said the Cards didn't need to sell low on Donovan. Low? That makes no sense. 2 years of control great defense, good offense, where is the LOW at? Shady, tell the truth did you write that article?

Hurdy doesn't have great defense...

[Cusecards]

Before responding I did a little research.
Mariners just inked Naylor(LH hitting 1B) to a big 5 year deal.
Nothing against Burleson....who has been coming on with the bat....but why would the Mariners want Burleson??
So....to answer your question....basically nobody due to lack of interest.

They would have interest. He would play the same positions for them that he plays for us.

Could be...although with the Naylor signing scratch Burleson for 1B.
So that leaves OF/DH.
Not that the Mariners wouldn’t like to have Burleson but I just don’t see the fit where they would part with a significant pitcher.
Maybe with Burleson part of a package but that is a whole different thread.
To be honest the OP is famous for starting these kind of threads.
I consider it mostly a need for attention as he is also famous for starting repetitive threads daily.
And considering his Burleson fixation I find it even more strange.