Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Montgomery already justifying the dollars
…stating Broberg is a person who can just take over a game.
I’m waiting for that day. Sounds beauuu tee fullll
I’m waiting for that day. Sounds beauuu tee fullll
-
PregnantNun
- Forum User
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 18 Nov 2025 20:29 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Did you see yesterday's game
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Still waiting
-
crookedfeeder
- Forum User
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Broberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
He dogged Barbashev hard for years here. This is the same thing......take a contrarian position and jam it down every ones throat ad nauseam all for the attention he needs.
This is just the beginning so get used to it.
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Since you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
What I’m complain about is those comments/assessmrnts. Look what you just quoted. What games have you watched in which Broberg took over.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 08:18 amSince you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
You’ve started multiple threads about what type of player Broberg is and his expected future with the Blues. So what’s a reasonable contact for Broberg?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:23 amWhat I’m complain about is those comments/assessmrnts. Look what you just quoted. What games have you watched in which Broberg took over.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 08:18 amSince you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
What type of player did I say Broberg was multiple times? Let’s start there.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:27 amYou’ve started multiple threads about what type of player Broberg is and his expected future with the Blues. So what’s a reasonable contact for Broberg?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:23 amWhat I’m complain about is those comments/assessmrnts. Look what you just quoted. What games have you watched in which Broberg took over.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 08:18 amSince you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Haha it can't answer. What a shocker.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:27 amYou’ve started multiple threads about what type of player Broberg is and his expected future with the Blues. So what’s a reasonable contact for Broberg?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:23 amWhat I’m complain about is those comments/assessmrnts. Look what you just quoted. What games have you watched in which Broberg took over.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 08:18 amSince you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
That he’s not the type of player you build around. So what’s a reasonable contract for him in your estimation?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:39 amWhat type of player did I say Broberg was multiple times? Let’s start there.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:27 amYou’ve started multiple threads about what type of player Broberg is and his expected future with the Blues. So what’s a reasonable contact for Broberg?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 10:23 amWhat I’m complain about is those comments/assessmrnts. Look what you just quoted. What games have you watched in which Broberg took over.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 08:18 amSince you’re complaining about a contract that hasn’t been offered yet what do you think the contract should be?theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 00:03 amBroberg would be a great piece on a great team. I just don’t see him as a player you build around. Not yet anyways. Hasn’t come close to proving that.crookedfeeder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025 23:39 pm Broberg will get his $8m. Armstrong will continue to show everyone how smart he is. $8m is his new $6.5m. then he won't be able to move the contract.
Montgomery saying he can take over games is just ridiculous. He doesn’t even play on pp or 6 on 5’s. Takes over games at even strength? Hahahaha ok then
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
What I said was he hasn’t proven to be a player you build around. A true stud who plays in all situations. A leader in and off the ice. No he has yet to prove that. That’s fact.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 11:45 am That he’s not the type of player you build around. So what’s a reasonable contract for him in your estimation?
The Blues said the same things about Thomas and Kyrou. Armstrong publicly stated that teams would tank for both players. Do you think that’s true? It’s hilarious actually.
When negotiating with Pietrangelo (who scored a cup goal, captained the team, and did things you will never see again in your lifetime), they never said anything close to that. It’s politics and agenda driven.
For Broberg I’d start in low 7’s with not a lot of term. There is risk in that, but there’s risk the other way too.
-
PregnantNun
- Forum User
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 18 Nov 2025 20:29 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
I see you are new here. Welcome.PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
And get used to it.