No gaming the system this year boysFrank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
·
52m
Sources: The #NHL and #NHLPA have agreed to a rolling implementation schedule for CBA changes.
Among them: the new playoff salary cap system will come into effect *this season* for the 2026 Stanley Cup playoffs.
CBA Update
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
CBA Update
-
TruBlueFan_1970
- Forum User
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: CBA Update
Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
I'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
-
TruBlueFan_1970
- Forum User
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: CBA Update
I just looked it up. It’s the 20-man roster for each game that must be compliant. Most teams, other than maybe FLA should be fine. FLA might need to drop a guy though….it will be close.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: CBA Update
It’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
That's just idiotic. Vegas iced a cap compliant team. They had 18 million sitting in the pressboxTruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmI just looked it up. It’s the 20-man roster for each game that must be compliant. Most teams, other than maybe FLA should be fine. FLA might need to drop a guy though….it will be close.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
Well like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: CBA Update
Vegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
Yeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: CBA Update
The overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: CBA Update
The cap hit of the on-ice 20 man roster for Vegas’s cup clinching win in Game 5 of 2023 was about 77.5M, below the 82.5M salary cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 17:48 pmThe overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
They were over the cap with the rest of the roster off the ice that were either still injured or scratched (Lehner, Nolan Patrick, Logan Thompson, etc.).
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 1707
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: CBA Update
It’s only good until the next loophole is found…
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
Unfortunately, at least for Vegas it was. I was shocked when I did the math because I was positive they had like 92 or 93 million on the ice, but nope they were below the cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 17:48 pmThe overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
Now the others I haven't checked yet, but at least for Vegas this rule would have made no difference.
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 908
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: CBA Update
From the Athletic yesterday….TheJackBurton wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 08:02 amUnfortunately, at least for Vegas it was. I was shocked when I did the math because I was positive they had like 92 or 93 million on the ice, but nope they were below the cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 17:48 pmThe overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
Now the others I haven't checked yet, but at least for Vegas this rule would have made no difference.
“ The main impact of adding a postseason salary cap will be an end to teams being able to stash players on long-term injured reserve and use that additional cap space to add more talent before the playoffs.
The Chicago Blackhawks (2015), Tampa Bay Lightning (2021), Vegas Golden Knights (2023) and Florida Panthers (2025) are all examples of teams that employed LTIR to remove injured star players from the cap temporarily, only to have them return for the postseason. All four won the Stanley Cup that season.”
Tampa was 18 million over….they even bragged about it and made t-shirts…
Another article
https://www.novasportslaw.com/post/the- ... tanley-cup
Last edited by Bubble4427 on 03 Sep 2025 08:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: CBA Update
Yeah but the point is that the new rule stipulates that the players actually suiting up for a playoff game (18 skaters, 2 goalies) is all that has to be cap compliant, which is different than the regular season. That change would *not* have prevented Vegas from winning their Cup. Their on-ice cap hit in the Cup Final was about 5M below the cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 08:41 amFrom the Athletic yesterday….TheJackBurton wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 08:02 amUnfortunately, at least for Vegas it was. I was shocked when I did the math because I was positive they had like 92 or 93 million on the ice, but nope they were below the cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 17:48 pmThe overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
Now the others I haven't checked yet, but at least for Vegas this rule would have made no difference.
“ The main impact of adding a postseason salary cap will be an end to teams being able to stash players on long-term injured reserve and use that additional cap space to add more talent before the playoffs.
The Chicago Blackhawks (2015), Tampa Bay Lightning (2021), Vegas Golden Knights (2023) and Florida Panthers (2025) are all examples of teams that employed LTIR to remove injured star players from the cap temporarily, only to have them return for the postseason. All four won the Stanley Cup that season.”
Tampa was 18 million over….they even bragged about it and made t-shirts…
Another article
https://www.novasportslaw.com/post/the- ... tanley-cup
But to your point... the team that Tampa had on the ice for their Cup win in 2021 had a cap hit of 89M... about 7.5M over the salary cap. This new rule would have hurt them in a big way.
-
TheJackBurton
- Forum User
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: CBA Update
Yes, I'm aware and Tampa's was the one where I think the league really started to take notice because they purposely kept Kuch out until the playoffs because of the shortened season, and as you stated bragged about their overage.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 08:41 amFrom the Athletic yesterday….TheJackBurton wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 08:02 amUnfortunately, at least for Vegas it was. I was shocked when I did the math because I was positive they had like 92 or 93 million on the ice, but nope they were below the cap.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 17:48 pmThe overage was not in the press box. There have been 4 teams since 2015 that fielded “illegal” teams that were over the cap. If the current rules were in place….Chicago, Tampa, Vegas, and The Panthers would have been screwed.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:59 pmYeah, but like I said this rule wouldn't have prevented what they put on the ice, the overage was in the pressbox.Bubble4427 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:56 pmVegas played the system at least once (with Stone)….and Tampa did it with Kucherov.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:48 pmWell like I said up above, that doesn't do much. Vegas iced a cap compliant team but had close to 20 million sitting in the press box. This league simply can't get out of its own way.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:21 pmIt’s the 20 (or less) on the ice. You just have to ice a team that’s Cap complaint. So not as strict as the regular season rule but it’s something.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:14 pmI'm pretty sure it's the full roster. Doesn't make sense to have it only be the 20 on the ice.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 14:10 pm Can’t remember what they agreed to. Is it full roster complaince, or the cap of the 20 players iced each night, or something else. Guessing it’s not full roster, unless the call-ups and black aces don’t count against the playoff cap unless they play.
I’ll try to look this up, but was just being lazy!![]()
It was a loophole that had to be closed. I’m glad it’s done.
Now if they had to be cap compliant, then Vegas and Tampa would have had some incredibly difficult decisions to make.
Now the others I haven't checked yet, but at least for Vegas this rule would have made no difference.
“ The main impact of adding a postseason salary cap will be an end to teams being able to stash players on long-term injured reserve and use that additional cap space to add more talent before the playoffs.
The Chicago Blackhawks (2015), Tampa Bay Lightning (2021), Vegas Golden Knights (2023) and Florida Panthers (2025) are all examples of teams that employed LTIR to remove injured star players from the cap temporarily, only to have them return for the postseason. All four won the Stanley Cup that season.”
Tampa was 18 million over….they even bragged about it and made t-shirts…
Another article
https://www.novasportslaw.com/post/the- ... tanley-cup
But as both Blue and I have pointed out this rule wouldn't have done anything to prevent Vegas' shenanigans because their on ice cap hit was cap compliant. All their overage was in the press box. If the entire 23 man roster had to be cap compliant like it does in the regular season, then Vegas would have had some issues.
to me having the team on the ice being cap compliant is pretty useless if you can hide 10-12 million in the press box. Having to cut 10-12 million for the playoffs is a completely different story.