Wilson Contreras

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

TheSolution
Forum User
Posts: 81
Joined: 27 Aug 2025 23:24 pm

Wilson Contreras

Post by TheSolution »

Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2657
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by OldRed »

TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
If you are going to criticize a player, at least spell his name correctly.
WLTFE
Forum User
Posts: 2369
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by WLTFE »

OldRed wrote: 28 Aug 2025 07:24 am
TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
If you are going to criticize a player, at least spell his name correctly.
+1😁
HorseTrader
Forum User
Posts: 2358
Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by HorseTrader »

TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
Seems to fall under the hindsight is 20-20
3dender
Forum User
Posts: 1558
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:57 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by 3dender »

TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
Dexter Fowler WAR on the Cards:
1.7
-1.4
1.5
0.0

Contreras WAR on Cards:
3.3
3
2 so far

Nothing alike, on top of which Contreras has visibly been about the only player who actually cares for the last 3 seasons. Dumb OP.

And I was disappointed in the signing at the time and didn't like Contreras when he first came and at the time I sided with the pitchers and coaches when they humiliated him.
Last edited by 3dender on 28 Aug 2025 07:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17264
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by 45s »

HorseTrader wrote: 28 Aug 2025 07:37 am
TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
Seems to fall under the hindsight is 20-20
and a lack of due diligence by the front office
AnExParrot
Forum User
Posts: 1137
Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by AnExParrot »

A regular poster so afraid of losing credibility they create a fresh account to present this steaming hot take. :lol: :roll:
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by imadangman »

Well, you can't argue with the production. He's been as productive as any player (worth the money) we have, and while his attitude gets in his own way at times there's a lot of other things you can circle as far as what's wrong with this team.
3dender
Forum User
Posts: 1558
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:57 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by 3dender »

imadangman wrote: 28 Aug 2025 07:57 am Well, you can't argue with the production. He's been as productive as any player (worth the money) we have, and while his attitude gets in his own way at times there's a lot of other things you can circle as far as what's wrong with this team.
His teammates seem to like him, I've never seen any hint that players are avoiding him in the dugout and on the contrary I've seen a lot of examples of players laughing with him and hugging him.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3947
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by ecleme22 »

WC has been an asset in all three years as a Cardinal.

And his move to 1B has been very successful. Plus, he has avoided injury.


Anyone who is comparing WC with Fowler contract or implying that WC is a cancer because the Cubs weren't in a place to give him 80mil, obviously has issues with WC in 'different' ways.
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2657
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by OldRed »

ecleme22 wrote: 28 Aug 2025 08:00 am WC has been an asset in all three years as a Cardinal.

And his move to 1B has been very successful. Plus, he has avoided injury.


Anyone who is comparing WC with Fowler contract or implying that WC is a cancer because the Cubs weren't in a place to give him 80mil, obviously has issues with WC in 'different' ways.
He has been a bigger asset this year. But he not the big bat a good team needs. He would be an excellent #6 hitter with a good team around him.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3947
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by ecleme22 »

OldRed wrote: 28 Aug 2025 08:15 am
ecleme22 wrote: 28 Aug 2025 08:00 am WC has been an asset in all three years as a Cardinal.

And his move to 1B has been very successful. Plus, he has avoided injury.


Anyone who is comparing WC with Fowler contract or implying that WC is a cancer because the Cubs weren't in a place to give him 80mil, obviously has issues with WC in 'different' ways.
He has been a bigger asset this year. But he not the big bat a good team needs. He would be an excellent #6 hitter with a good team around him.
Let's remember, he's like a 5year/85mil dollar player.

It's not like he's making big bat money...
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 12584
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by rockondlouie »

Big Fan of WillyC.

Wish we had a team full just like him.
TheSolution
Forum User
Posts: 81
Joined: 27 Aug 2025 23:24 pm

Re: Willson Contreras

Post by TheSolution »

>This isn’t a hindsight 20-20 situation, all data and info was clear prior to signing.

>If some say it’s 20-20, as in we can now see it was a bad decision, then that contradicts with others who think he was a good signing.

The WC issue is paramount to dividing people that get it and people who don’t.

To understand the WC issue, one has to have the ability to process in layers and from various angles, which most, especially online sports forum users do not possess.

This signing was destined to fail based on two division rivals decisions. It was a waste of money, stealing financial resources from pitching staff. It disrupted development of others, stole DH at-bats and disrupted catching development.

>Unhinged tantrums aren’t the pinnacle of someone ‘caring’. When Yadi snapped, it was usually on deep principle, WC is a near Tommy Pham type snapper. Big difference. If we get off the paper data, one just has to look at WC’s eyes and face and see the issues just as you can see with Pham. There’s a hyper tension and visible IQ limitations, which of course was a key limitation in WC’s ability to be a catcher and manage the pitchers arsenal.

>WC is similar to Fowler as our primary rival wanted nothing to do with either. Neither could field their position. Neither were the bat Cardinals fans hoped for, despite it being obvious prior. Both on 5 year deals. Neither had interest around MLB during free agency. Both were overpays based on market. Neither were tradable during the contract.

Have a great day, all.
Last edited by TheSolution on 28 Aug 2025 14:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
icon
Forum User
Posts: 5028
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by icon »

AnExParrot wrote: 28 Aug 2025 07:41 am A regular poster so afraid of losing credibility they create a fresh account to present this steaming hot take. :lol: :roll:
Yeah, what was the previous iteration of this poster? The condescending, sanctimonious style rings a bell.
Quincy Varnish
Forum User
Posts: 17497
Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am

Re: Wilson Contreras

Post by Quincy Varnish »

TheSolution wrote: 27 Aug 2025 23:42 pm Inputs:
>cubs didn’t want him
>cubs manager was an mlb catcher and didn’t see WC as a catcher moving forward
>cubs insider reports of breaking iPads and damaging clubhouse regularly
>little to no interest on the free agent market
>never hit 25 HR’s
>likely was not going to stick at the position signed to play, catcher
>doesn’t have the power/bat to justify as free agent signing for DH
>division rival got the younger, better, far cheaper brother who can actually play the position of catcher while providing a better bat.
>he’s been a .240s-.250s hitter through his prime

There’s a universal code, when one division rival wants nothing to do with a player and the other division rival got the younger, better, cheaper version of what you got, it’s a set up for sure failure.

To say WC is the least of the problems because you’ll take his numbers and he’s not the reason this is bad. It’s the pitching. It’s Walker not developing. It’s Noot. It’s whatever else. Yeah, that’s all true and this isn’t about singling out a single reason this has all gone so bad. It’s a very thin level of critical analysis to ignore how devastatingly dumb it was to sign this guy.

I hope for the strong majority of people in Cardinal Nation who applauded this signing and even stuck by it through the transition from catcher to first, stating he would improve his bat without catching duties (didn’t happen), can now be honest about what a mess this is.

A very similar mess to Dexter Fowler, who also wasn’t wanted by the cubs or really anyone else in mlb, much like WC, with a very similar support structure.
So the previously banned user known as ‘Supreme’ and various other useless usernames makes his triumphant return…

Neat.
Post Reply