An interesting ranking of top Cardinals' prospects

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

[craviduce]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

[craviduce]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

[craviduce]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

again, this isn't an "Interesting Ranking System"....it's just their Top 30 split up into Pitcher and Hitter with 2025 Stats. They didn't use the stats to rank the players.

Misleading OP.

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

I find it interesting, you don't. So what? Maybe you should do a ranking of your own with your criteria.

[craviduce]

the link is a nice link.

Valuable, convenient info.

[craviduce]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

I find it interesting, you don't. So what? Maybe you should do a ranking of your own with your criteria.

I do hundreds of rankings throughout the season. I only wanted to explain that your claim on the OP was false. And extremely misleading. You need to Read and Comprehend what you intend to link before making Stupid Claims

...

the link is nice, but not a NEW Ranking System

[HorseTrader]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

Interesting that we don't have a prospects ranked at number(s) 2, 8,9,10, 12, 13, 19........

Some of those show up depending on whether you look at past 10 days, 30 days or the year.

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

I find it interesting, you don't. So what? Maybe you should do a ranking of your own with your criteria.

I do hundreds of rankings throughout the season. I only wanted to explain that your claim on the OP was false. And extremely misleading. You need to Read and Comprehend what you intend to link before making Stupid Claims

...

the link is nice, but not a NEW Ranking System

Please post your updated rankings. I would sure like to check it out. And see how it compares to this.

[craviduce]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

I find it interesting, you don't. So what? Maybe you should do a ranking of your own with your criteria.

I do hundreds of rankings throughout the season. I only wanted to explain that your claim on the OP was false. And extremely misleading. You need to Read and Comprehend what you intend to link before making Stupid Claims

...

the link is nice, but not a NEW Ranking System

Please post your updated rankings. I would sure like to check it out. And see how it compares to this.

Again...I'm not challenging their 3 week old ranking system. I'm challenging your lack of comprehension to what you linked and claimed. It "wasn't" a new ranking system.

MLB's Top 30 prospect list is usually okay....3rd or 4th tier of what is usually out there. Athletic, BA, BP, ESPN are continuously better.

They're usually very lazy thoughout the year with their updates.

[Shady]

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/stats?tea ... ay&minPA=1

mlb.com's Top 30 prospect rankings?

glad you find them interesting.

I like the breakdown between hitters and pitchers.

it's just season stats.

They didn't change their rankings.

It's nice to look at, but it's' not an "interesting ranking system"

It sure illustrates the high level catching depth in the organization.

how does it illustrate that?

There's a lot of catchers in the Top 10. Other rankings illustrate this too, without listing current stats

I find it interesting, you don't. So what? Maybe you should do a ranking of your own with your criteria.

I do hundreds of rankings throughout the season. I only wanted to explain that your claim on the OP was false. And extremely misleading. You need to Read and Comprehend what you intend to link before making Stupid Claims

...

the link is nice, but not a NEW Ranking System

Please post your updated rankings. I would sure like to check it out. And see how it compares to this.

Again...I'm not challenging their 3 week old ranking system. I'm challenging your lack of comprehension to what you linked and claimed. It "wasn't" a new ranking system.

MLB's Top 30 prospect list is usually okay....3rd or 4th tier of what is usually out there. Athletic, BA, BP, ESPN are continuously better.

They're usually very lazy thoughout the year with their updates.

As usual, you are much too concerned about me. You need to just stick to baseball conversation.