About that aging defense corps . . .

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 6776
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by DawgDad »

From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
bud white
Forum User
Posts: 1974
Joined: 26 Oct 2018 21:25 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by bud white »

DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
netboy65
Forum User
Posts: 1521
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by netboy65 »

bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1168
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by seattleblue »

netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:13 pm
bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
how did they game the system
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1080
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by a smell of green grass »

DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 6776
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by DawgDad »

a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
No. We've already seen Fowler and Broberg. The point here is at the end of the 23-24 season it looked like the Blues were stuck with a smallish, aging, declining, expensive top-4, and how quickly Army has transformed the unit.
netboy65
Forum User
Posts: 1521
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by netboy65 »

seattleblue wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:33 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:13 pm
bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
how did they game the system
I don’t remember the specifics, but they negotiated with him in advance didn’t select him in expansion draft then just signed him once FA opened. Or something to that effect
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 1499
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by MiamiLaw »

netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
seattleblue wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:33 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:13 pm
bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
how did they game the system
I don’t remember the specifics, but they negotiated with him in advance didn’t select him in expansion draft then just signed him once FA opened. Or something to that effect
The Blues absolutely got screwed. Basically, seattleblue, the Kraken had the right to exclusively speak to pending UFAs before they hit the market and before their draft BUT if they signed one before the draft, that was their pick from the old team. It is documented SEA spoke to Schwartz. They obviously agreed in principle on a deal because he signed with them within minutes of UFA opening. However, since they did not technically sign him before the draft, they ALSO got Dunn.

I honestly think the Blues should have filed a grievance and I was super (upset) that it was happening right in the open at the time. And how that obvious loophole was not taken into account with the rules is mindblowing.

They should have lost the right to select from the team if they chose to speak to the pending UFA.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1080
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by a smell of green grass »

DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:11 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
No. We've already seen Fowler and Broberg. The point here is at the end of the 23-24 season it looked like the Blues were stuck with a smallish, aging, declining, expensive top-4, and how quickly Army has transformed the unit.
I agree that he changed the lineup quickly and likely for the better. I'll clap for that. It's not much of a clap though. :)

I admire your cheerleading and optimism. Good for you.
SRV1990
Forum User
Posts: 459
Joined: 28 May 2024 12:10 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by SRV1990 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
I find it curious you are now taking a wait and see approach to Army’s recent moves, but in the past you’ve been very quick to pass judgement and criticize. So either you’re a complete hypocrite or… never mind, you’re a hypocrite.
Tony Palazzolo
Forum User
Posts: 165
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:13 am

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by Tony Palazzolo »

MiamiLaw wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:21 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
seattleblue wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:33 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:13 pm
bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
how did they game the system
I don’t remember the specifics, but they negotiated with him in advance didn’t select him in expansion draft then just signed him once FA opened. Or something to that effect
The Blues absolutely got screwed. Basically, seattleblue, the Kraken had the right to exclusively speak to pending UFAs before they hit the market and before their draft BUT if they signed one before the draft, that was their pick from the old team. It is documented SEA spoke to Schwartz. They obviously agreed in principle on a deal because he signed with them within minutes of UFA opening. However, since they did not technically sign him before the draft, they ALSO got Dunn.

I honestly think the Blues should have filed a grievance and I was super (upset) that it was happening right in the open at the time. And how that obvious loophole was not taken into account with the rules is mindblowing.

They should have lost the right to select from the team if they chose to speak to the pending UFA.
It was all legal - once he hit free agency he could've signed with anyone. They just happened to know he wanted to be there so he could be closer to his dying mother.
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 1499
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by MiamiLaw »

Tony Palazzolo wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:33 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:21 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
seattleblue wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:33 pm
netboy65 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 15:13 pm
bud white wrote: 02 Jul 2025 13:04 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
It takes time to turn an aircraft carrier around. The Cup team lost a lot of D - for a range of reasons (several outside of Army's control such as JBow). And if we knew we'd lost JBow, they don't expose Dunn to Seattle). The "older" D he went with was there to keep the boat afloat as much as possible.
You have a couple things reversed. JBo had his incident in 2020 and the Kraken expansion draft wasn’t until 2021 so we knew about him when we exposed Dunn. Schwartz should have counted as our contribution but Seattle gamed the system
how did they game the system
I don’t remember the specifics, but they negotiated with him in advance didn’t select him in expansion draft then just signed him once FA opened. Or something to that effect
The Blues absolutely got screwed. Basically, seattleblue, the Kraken had the right to exclusively speak to pending UFAs before they hit the market and before their draft BUT if they signed one before the draft, that was their pick from the old team. It is documented SEA spoke to Schwartz. They obviously agreed in principle on a deal because he signed with them within minutes of UFA opening. However, since they did not technically sign him before the draft, they ALSO got Dunn.

I honestly think the Blues should have filed a grievance and I was super (upset) that it was happening right in the open at the time. And how that obvious loophole was not taken into account with the rules is mindblowing.

They should have lost the right to select from the team if they chose to speak to the pending UFA.
It was all legal - once he hit free agency he could've signed with anyone. They just happened to know he wanted to be there so he could be closer to his dying mother.
I know it was “legal” by the book
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 6776
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by DawgDad »

SRV1990 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:12 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
I find it curious you are now taking a wait and see approach to Army’s recent moves, but in the past you’ve been very quick to pass judgement and criticize. So either you’re a complete hypocrite or… never mind, you’re a hypocrite.
I threw this out here for a dual purpose, to acknowledge the good work Army has done transforming a stagnant defense AND to demonstrate the current state of the forum, proportionately overloaded with cynics, naysayers, trolls, and outright Army haters. Precious few of you have said "Yeah, he's done some good work here", or even "didn't expect this level of transformation this quickly". I really don't see that as cheerleading, it's just being honest.

None of us know how Mailloux will turn out but it's pretty clear the Blues needed a young top half of draft quality RHD more than they needed an emerging young winger. When you think the team COULD still have Leddy, Parayko, Krug/Perunovich, and Faulk as the top-4, well . . .

This is an exciting time to be a Blues fan. The team is in transition working in a number of solid-looking young players, they have a top-notch coach, and they are coming off a record setting extended win streak and 2OT game 7 playoff elimination by the President's Trophy team, a team they outscored 17-5 in the three home games in the series. A team that looked like a dysfunctional mediocre mess a year ago.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1080
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by a smell of green grass »

SRV1990 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:12 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
I find it curious you are now taking a wait and see approach to Army’s recent moves, but in the past you’ve been very quick to pass judgement and criticize. So either you’re a complete hypocrite or… never mind, you’re a hypocrite.
Some decisions take time to critique. Some don't.

I'm happy that I'm smart enough to know what people care discuss. Nobody cares to discuss an evaluation of a BluesTalk user. That's boring, man.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1080
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by a smell of green grass »

DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:53 pm
SRV1990 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:12 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
I find it curious you are now taking a wait and see approach to Army’s recent moves, but in the past you’ve been very quick to pass judgement and criticize. So either you’re a complete hypocrite or… never mind, you’re a hypocrite.
I threw this out here for a dual purpose, to acknowledge the good work Army has done transforming a stagnant defense AND to demonstrate the current state of the forum, proportionately overloaded with cynics, naysayers, trolls, and outright Army haters. Precious few of you have said "Yeah, he's done some good work here", or even "didn't expect this level of transformation this quickly". I really don't see that as cheerleading, it's just being honest.

None of us know how Mailloux will turn out but it's pretty clear the Blues needed a young top half of draft quality RHD more than they needed an emerging young winger. When you think the team COULD still have Leddy, Parayko, Krug/Perunovich, and Faulk as the top-4, well . . .

This is an exciting time to be a Blues fan. The team is in transition working in a number of solid-looking young players, they have a top-notch coach, and they are coming off a record setting extended win streak and 2OT game 7 playoff elimination by the President's Trophy team, a team they outscored 17-5 in the three home games in the series. A team that looked like a dysfunctional mediocre mess a year ago.
I was luxuriating in the re-whatever tub, waiting for the bubbles to climax, and Army pulled the plug on me when he said that the re-whatever is over. I've been a little on edge as a result.

Lately, Army is making moves that promise bubbles soon, so I'm a little happier.
SRV1990
Forum User
Posts: 459
Joined: 28 May 2024 12:10 pm

Re: About that aging defense corps . . .

Post by SRV1990 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 18:01 pm
SRV1990 wrote: 02 Jul 2025 17:12 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 02 Jul 2025 16:01 pm
DawgDad wrote: 02 Jul 2025 12:59 pm From the vantage point of the end of the 2023-24 season how many of us envisioned THIS transition in the defense:

Broberg added
Fowler added
Mailloux added
Coach hired who likes Tucker

Suter signed, leveraged, and released
Krug to LTIR (terminal)
Leddy waived

An aging top-4 is 1/2 to 3/4 transformed into what figures to be a bigger, tougher, good skating, more point-productive unit with solid L/R balance.

Give the man some credit. This is awesome, frankly.
The man has dressed the Barbie, but none of us have any idea if these moves will lead to a date with Stanley Cup. Don't you think you should at least see a couple of games on the ice before you hand out ribbons?

You, Me, ANYBODY can dress a Barbie. That is just putting a purse on an arm, and heels on feet.
I find it curious you are now taking a wait and see approach to Army’s recent moves, but in the past you’ve been very quick to pass judgement and criticize. So either you’re a complete hypocrite or… never mind, you’re a hypocrite.
Some decisions take time to critique. Some don't.

I'm happy that I'm smart enough to know what people care discuss. Nobody cares to discuss an evaluation of a BluesTalk user. That's boring, man.
Keep moving the goalposts, it’s what losers and hypocrites do. And those who lack intelligence.
Post Reply