Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5211
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Cranny »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Move him to LF.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Cranny wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:32 am
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Move him to LF.
And dislodge Herrera?
JDW
Forum User
Posts: 1189
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by JDW »

Cranny wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:32 am
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Move him to LF.
LF is where some of us are hoping Herrera can fit, and only b/c he doesn't throw well for a C. If Crooks can C decently, the last thing you want to do is move him to another position.
Herrera already has proven to be able to hit MLB pitching at a good clip. I'd doubt Crooks will hit as good as Herrera, but also don't know, but do know Crooks hasn't proven anything yet at the MLB level.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

JDW wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:36 am
Cranny wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:32 am
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Move him to LF.
LF is where some of us are hoping Herrera can fit, and only b/c he doesn't throw well for a C. If Crooks can C decently, the last thing you want to do is move him to another position.
Herrera already has proven to be able to hit MLB pitching at a good clip. I'd doubt Crooks will hit as good as Herrera, but also don't know, but do know Crooks hasn't proven anything yet at the MLB level.
Crooks is like someone graduating from college- we don't know if he can do the thing, or not- but he's ready to try.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11865
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by rockondlouie »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:35 am
Cranny wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:32 am
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Move him to LF.
And dislodge Herrera?
Bingo

I want to see Hererra working all winter and next spring w/J. Jay instructing him on playing LF!

And we're in 100% agreement, Bernal is the guy I've had my eye's on too as THE catcher of the future.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1300
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Basil Shabazz »

There's nothing wrong with Bernal/Crooks in a two-catcher system while both are cost-controlled. "A" catchers only start 100 of 162 nowadays anyway.
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 7832
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Futuregm2 »

Basil Shabazz wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:57 am There's nothing wrong with Bernal/Crooks in a two-catcher system while both are cost-controlled. "A" catchers only start 100 of 162 nowadays anyway.
There’s also nothing wrong with Bernal-Pages/Pozo and trading Crooks for a valuable player at another position of need.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Basil Shabazz wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:57 am There's nothing wrong with Bernal/Crooks in a two-catcher system while both are cost-controlled. "A" catchers only start 100 of 162 nowadays anyway.
I'm thinking Bernal/Pages and using Crooks to fill other needs.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11865
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by rockondlouie »

Futuregm2 wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:58 am
Basil Shabazz wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:57 am There's nothing wrong with Bernal/Crooks in a two-catcher system while both are cost-controlled. "A" catchers only start 100 of 162 nowadays anyway.
There’s also nothing wrong with Bernal-Pages/Pozo and trading Crooks for a valuable player at another position of need.
I understand Basil's point but this ^^^ is what you do.

Use Cricks' as currency to acquire a need while Pages/Pozo serve as low cost, quality backups/mentors to Bernal.
2ninr
Forum User
Posts: 746
Joined: 24 May 2024 15:04 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by 2ninr »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:59 am
Basil Shabazz wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:57 am There's nothing wrong with Bernal/Crooks in a two-catcher system while both are cost-controlled. "A" catchers only start 100 of 162 nowadays anyway.
I'm thinking Bernal/Pages and using Crooks to fill other needs.
We just have to be shrewd with the moves we make here. Catcher is 1a or 1b a position of strength. This situation won't come around again any time soon. We've all been shown first hand that your primary catcher has to play defense first. Correct evaluation is crucial. I'm betting nothing happens until the offseason unless someone just blows us away with an offer.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

He's 24 now. He's reached AAA and done well there. We're at the crossroads now where he needs to be promoted and used, or moved on. If you leave him at Memphis, not only does he block Bernal, his trade value begins to deteriorate. Also, this offseason, both he and Bernal have to be added to the 40-man roster to protect from the Rule V draft. We kind of joke now about how many catchers are on the roster. Would we carry 5 catchers on the 40 man roster? Probably not. Will we leave Crooks or Bernal unprotected? Probably not. It's time to move one.
bretto12
Forum User
Posts: 210
Joined: 29 May 2024 19:51 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by bretto12 »

Put Herrera at First Base. Contreras will be gone in a couple of years.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 7941
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by scoutyjones2 »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 23 Jun 2025 11:29 am Jimmy Crooks is not a player I dislike, or just want to get rid of. We simply have too many catchers and someone has got to go. My own opinion is that Leo Bernal is the long-term catcher here. Crooks has pretty good trade value. He is currently the Cardinals #4 prospect. This may be something that gets done in the offseason, but it would be nice to make room at AAA to promote Leo Bernal next month. It would be best to sell while his trade value is high and before he gets exposed to major league pitching.
In a Ryan Helsley thread, I listed Crooks as one of the players in that deal. The Phillies are a great fit for him.

Comment on the above, rank the below, or offer your own suggestions.
1) Crooks, Helsley, Nootbaar, and Matz to the Phillies for Aidan Miller, Justin Crawford, and Mick Abel.
2) Jimmy Crooks to Tampa Bay for Santiago Suarez.
3) Jimmy Crooks to the Cleveland Guardians for Welbyn Francisca and Daniel Espino.
Isn't he rule 5?
JDW
Forum User
Posts: 1189
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm

Re: Jimmy Crooks (TB)

Post by JDW »

Wouldn't Pozo have some trade value? I know he's been getting some big hits, but a Pages/Crooks tandem in the 2nd half might work for the Cards.
Pozo has been a nice gift, but keeping Crooks over Pozo might be less risky and more of a reset type move. Pozo's is a proven MLB backup C and knows what a bat is for.
If I'm a contender type team with a questionable backup C, maybe Pozo has some value, albeit probably as mainly as a throw in.
Post Reply