STLtoday.com

Who says no?

If Sale is owed five cents, this ownership wouldn’t do it.

Sale is a heck of a pitcher but will turn 37 next March.
Plus he has not exactly been the picture of health.
I’d deal Noot in a package for someone younger.

Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Jun 2025 20:13 pm Sale is a heck of a pitcher but will turn 37 next March.
Plus he has not exactly been the picture of health.
I’d deal Noot in a package for someone younger.

Understandable. Just not sure how much value Nootbaar has.

Would you trade Sonny Gray for Chris Sale? It's probably the only team Sonny would approve a trade to, and the only way our ownership would take on Sale's contract.

stlcardinals wrote: ↑13 Jun 2025 20:20 pm

Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Jun 2025 20:13 pm Sale is a heck of a pitcher but will turn 37 next March.
Plus he has not exactly been the picture of health.
I’d deal Noot in a package for someone younger.

Understandable. Just not sure how much value Nootbaar has.

Not sure either but Sale doesn’t really fit the time line for the team.
I could see him rounding out a package.

If the team was in a good place for a WS run yes absolutely. But they aren’t so I wouldn’t see the point

Why would a team going through a "reboot" spend one of their trade chips on a 37 year old pitcher?

Noot for socks

Like I said in another thread:
Right now I’d trade Noot for Soupy Sales!