Graceffo

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 966
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Graceffo

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Random thought while watching Graceffo pitch tonight.

He reminds me of Lance Lynn when Lance came up. Similar build, similar stuff, always a starter but stuff plays real nice in the pen, and seems to have an edge to him like Lynn did.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3036
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by ecleme22 »

I listened to the last 4 innings on the radio, but I thought that too when I saw him.
Ronnie Dobbs
Forum User
Posts: 890
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by Ronnie Dobbs »

So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
3dender
Forum User
Posts: 1048
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:57 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by 3dender »

Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
hmoss859
Forum User
Posts: 202
Joined: 24 Mar 2025 23:30 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by hmoss859 »

Gordon needs a third pitch to be a starter

He needs a change or splitter to add to heater/slider

If not he can be a solid bullpen guy
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 9274
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Graceffo

Post by Cusecards »

3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
Leahy before Graceffo probably.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
RunSup
Forum User
Posts: 2534
Joined: 07 Dec 2022 19:08 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by RunSup »

3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
I don't think it's a done deal that Graceffo is a bullpen arm for ever. Thats just where the opportunity is right now on the big club. It's great that he's getting a run at getting ML hitters out. Hopefully learning every time out. Hopefully still developing pitches.

Space is going to clear by the end of the season in the starting rotation. McGreevy and Graceffo should get their shots.
3dender
Forum User
Posts: 1048
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:57 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by 3dender »

Cusecards wrote: 16 May 2025 22:56 pm
3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
Leahy before Graceffo probably.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
Roycroft's sinker is a top 10 pitch in baseball by Stuff+

It was last year, he had trouble finding it at the beginning of this year, then he got sent down and immediately fixed it so that it's better than ever.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 9274
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Graceffo

Post by Cusecards »

3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 23:21 pm
Cusecards wrote: 16 May 2025 22:56 pm
3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
Leahy before Graceffo probably.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
Roycroft's sinker is a top 10 pitch in baseball by Stuff+

It was last year, he had trouble finding it at the beginning of this year, then he got sent down and immediately fixed it so that it's better than ever.
Ok
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 9728
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by rockondlouie »

Likely being primed to replace Helsley midseason if he's dealt or in 2026.

I would NOT mess w/Leahy, he's too valuable handling the role he's in and closing is a different animal than being a set-up man.

T. Hence (IMO) would make a solid closer too, high velo fastball and great change-up reminds me of D. Williams.
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 12682
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Graceffo

Post by 82birds »

Cusecards wrote: 16 May 2025 22:56 pm
3dender wrote: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.

I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.
Leahy before Graceffo probably.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
agree, Cuse
thetank2
Forum User
Posts: 4196
Joined: 23 Aug 2018 10:30 am

Re: Graceffo

Post by thetank2 »

Unless we get a top pitching prospect for Helsley dealing him is a waste. If we QO Helsley he turns it down in order to get a multi-year multi-million contract. Same with Fedde.
Post Reply