Graceffo
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 966
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Graceffo
Random thought while watching Graceffo pitch tonight.
He reminds me of Lance Lynn when Lance came up. Similar build, similar stuff, always a starter but stuff plays real nice in the pen, and seems to have an edge to him like Lynn did.
He reminds me of Lance Lynn when Lance came up. Similar build, similar stuff, always a starter but stuff plays real nice in the pen, and seems to have an edge to him like Lynn did.
Re: Graceffo
I listened to the last 4 innings on the radio, but I thought that too when I saw him.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 890
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Graceffo
So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Re: Graceffo
I'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Re: Graceffo
Gordon needs a third pitch to be a starter
He needs a change or splitter to add to heater/slider
If not he can be a solid bullpen guy
He needs a change or splitter to add to heater/slider
If not he can be a solid bullpen guy
Re: Graceffo
Leahy before Graceffo probably.3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:46 pmI'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
Re: Graceffo
I don't think it's a done deal that Graceffo is a bullpen arm for ever. Thats just where the opportunity is right now on the big club. It's great that he's getting a run at getting ML hitters out. Hopefully learning every time out. Hopefully still developing pitches.3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:46 pmI'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Space is going to clear by the end of the season in the starting rotation. McGreevy and Graceffo should get their shots.
Re: Graceffo
Roycroft's sinker is a top 10 pitch in baseball by Stuff+Cusecards wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:56 pmLeahy before Graceffo probably.3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:46 pmI'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
It was last year, he had trouble finding it at the beginning of this year, then he got sent down and immediately fixed it so that it's better than ever.
Re: Graceffo
Ok3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 23:21 pmRoycroft's sinker is a top 10 pitch in baseball by Stuff+Cusecards wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:56 pmLeahy before Graceffo probably.3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:46 pmI'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
It was last year, he had trouble finding it at the beginning of this year, then he got sent down and immediately fixed it so that it's better than ever.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9728
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Graceffo
Likely being primed to replace Helsley midseason if he's dealt or in 2026.
I would NOT mess w/Leahy, he's too valuable handling the role he's in and closing is a different animal than being a set-up man.
T. Hence (IMO) would make a solid closer too, high velo fastball and great change-up reminds me of D. Williams.
I would NOT mess w/Leahy, he's too valuable handling the role he's in and closing is a different animal than being a set-up man.
T. Hence (IMO) would make a solid closer too, high velo fastball and great change-up reminds me of D. Williams.
Re: Graceffo
agree, CuseCusecards wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:56 pmLeahy before Graceffo probably.3dender wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:46 pmI'd try both Roycroft and Leahy as closers before Graceffo. I'd rather see him get a better chance to start.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑16 May 2025 22:28 pm So I might be totally off on this, but I seem to remember a few springs ago he showed up and was throwing with some velocity that they hadn't seen before and he was really turning some heads, so they were thinking that they might really have something there as a starting pitching prospect if he could maintain that velocity over a starting workload. I guess that really hasn't happened, so maybe this is that pivot to the bullpen moment that they decide that the guy isn't going to make it as a starter. He has certainly looked pretty good so far in this role.
I don't know. I don't follow the minors as much as others, so I can't say if it's time to proclaim him a closer candidate after Helsley or not, but it does seem like he could succeed there.
Roycroft???
I’d try Fredbird before Roycroft!
Re: Graceffo
Unless we get a top pitching prospect for Helsley dealing him is a waste. If we QO Helsley he turns it down in order to get a multi-year multi-million contract. Same with Fedde.