Page 1 of 10
CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:41 am
by sikeston bulldog2
Good morning
This is an exercise in discipline. Just one word answer. Keep it simple silly.
Me- IN.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:44 am
by St. Lew
In (asterisk)
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:47 am
by sikeston bulldog2
St. Lew wrote: ā14 May 2025 08:44 am
In (asterisk)
Iām gonna group the vote like the official panel- 16 votes 12 needed to get in. So the first 16 will be the first vote. Next 16, so on. And of course an overall tally.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:47 am
by slimjay63801
In.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:48 am
by MIDMOBIRDTWO
In
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out in
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:50 am
by Curtis
in
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:53 am
by Huzzah
In
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:54 am
by Ronnie Dobbs
How I would vote - Out
What will happen - In
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:54 am
by Adam2
in
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:57 am
by Swuhgen
In.
Joe Jackson better go in first.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 08:59 am
by slimjay63801
Swuhgen wrote: ā14 May 2025 08:57 am
In.
Joe Jackson better go in first.
Will Joe Jackson be in or will he be "Steppin Out"?
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 09:00 am
by rockondlouie
In
As a player he's a slam dunk, 1st ballot Hall of Famer and that's what he's going in for not his managing which s u c k e d.
Once the Hall started letting STEROID freaks in, there was no reason to exclude Rose the Player anymore.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 09:04 am
by sikeston bulldog2
Ten votes. Nine In.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 09:10 am
by thetank2
There is an integrity clause. Vote should be anonymous. I don't care but it should say he bet on baseball on the plaque.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 09:10 am
by VegasVinny
In.
I actually think there's a lot of merit to Derrick Goold's suggestion. Induct all of the questionable characters who performed at a HOF level and list their (baseball) transgressions on their plaque, whether it be gambling, performance-enhancing drug use, etc. The players get to say they're Hall of Famers and fans can get the whole picture to interpret and evaluate how they see fit.
Re: CT poll- Rose in/out
Posted: 14 May 2025 09:11 am
by 3dender
VegasVinny wrote: ā14 May 2025 09:10 am
In.
I actually think there's a lot of merit to Derrick Goold's suggestion. Induct all of the questionable characters who performed at a HOF level and list their (baseball) transgressions on their plaque, whether it be gambling, performance-enhancing drug use, etc. The players get to say they're Hall of Famers and fans can get the whole picture to interpret and evaluate how they see fit.
This
It's silly to pretend these players who put up some of the greatest numbers ever didn't exist, which is what the HOF currently does. They're a part of baseball history so include them in the most truthful way possible.