Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 11528
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by Absolut »

Ok with shoeless Joe. Not the pedo
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by ramfandan »

From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
redbird1.2.3.4
Forum User
Posts: 660
Joined: 22 Dec 2018 22:30 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by redbird1.2.3.4 »

I mean, it is the national baseball hall of fame, isn't it? Not the Hall of the morally superior. I think Pete Rose was an abhorrent human being, but also a hall of fame player, as most would agree by statistics alone.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 17612
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by craviduce »

ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 17:06 pm From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
isn't that when Albert and Yadi would go into the HOF? THat's great....all they need that weekend is to answer questions about Pete Rose instead of themselves
icon
Forum User
Posts: 3367
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by icon »

redbird1.2.3.4 wrote: 13 May 2025 17:42 pm I mean, it is the national baseball hall of fame, isn't it? Not the Hall of the morally superior. I think Pete Rose was an abhorrent human being, but also a hall of fame player, as most would agree by statistics alone.
Morality has nothing to do with Rose's ban. He broke a cardinal rule of baseball: MLB Rule 21(d) states: "(2) Any player, umpire, or Club or League official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform, shall be declared permanently ineligible."
BrummerStealsHome
Forum User
Posts: 2159
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by BrummerStealsHome »

Here we go, the Hall of Fame in the age of the beta males.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by ramfandan »

craviduce wrote: 13 May 2025 17:43 pm
ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 17:06 pm From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
isn't that when Albert and Yadi would go into the HOF? THat's great....all they need that weekend is to answer questions about Pete Rose instead of themselves
It would be a weird reporter to ask a newly inducted player his opinion on another and if asked. (If it was me) I would smile replying. ‘ I feel it inappropriate to comment on any other player.
I am very proud to be enshrined today.
End of comment
DwaininAztec
Forum User
Posts: 249
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:26 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by DwaininAztec »

I have maintained for some time that while he was alive, he had no place in the HOF. Now that he is dead the "lifetime" suspension would seem to be over. Just my opinion, for how little it is worth.
NorthernBird
Forum User
Posts: 259
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:20 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by NorthernBird »

MLB is only doing this because they’re a bunch of hypocrites who fully support gambling now.

It’s a shame they waited until he died. MLB and the owners are self serving schmucks.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 17612
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by craviduce »

ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 19:06 pm
craviduce wrote: 13 May 2025 17:43 pm
ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 17:06 pm From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
isn't that when Albert and Yadi would go into the HOF? THat's great....all they need that weekend is to answer questions about Pete Rose instead of themselves
It would be a weird reporter to ask a newly inducted player his opinion on another and if asked. (If it was me) I would smile replying. ‘ I feel it inappropriate to comment on any other player.
I am very proud to be enshrined today.
End of comment
I don't care how delicately one answers the reporters' question....I don't want Yadi and Albert going into the HOF at the same time as that Circus with Rose and Shoeless Joe
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 11528
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by Absolut »

redbird1.2.3.4 wrote: 13 May 2025 17:42 pm I mean, it is the national baseball hall of fame, isn't it? Not the Hall of the morally superior. I think Pete Rose was an abhorrent human being, but also a hall of fame player, as most would agree by statistics alone.
That’s not the criteria.

5. Voting: Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by ramfandan »

DwaininAztec wrote: 13 May 2025 19:08 pm I have maintained for some time that while he was alive, he had no place in the HOF. Now that he is dead the "lifetime" suspension would seem to be over. Just my opinion, for how little it is worth.
Understand how some viewed the penalty as ‘lifetime’ suspension, however if one reads the Rule 21 (as posted earlier),the word ‘lifetime’ does not appear.
The penalty last line says ‘permanent ‘

In my mind permanent has no end time. Would mean forever and ever.
I am not an attorney .
It actually seems odd that someone on a ‘permanent ineligible’ list for anything could be removed from said list.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 4210
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by ramfandan »

craviduce wrote: 13 May 2025 19:11 pm
ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 19:06 pm
craviduce wrote: 13 May 2025 17:43 pm
ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 17:06 pm From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
isn't that when Albert and Yadi would go into the HOF? THat's great....all they need that weekend is to answer questions about Pete Rose instead of themselves
It would be a weird reporter to ask a newly inducted player his opinion on another and if asked. (If it was me) I would smile replying. ‘ I feel it inappropriate to comment on any other player.
I am very proud to be enshrined today.
End of comment
I don't care how delicately one answers the reporters' question....I don't want Yadi and Albert going into the HOF at the same time as that Circus with Rose and Shoeless Joe
Understand your feelings. Could have awkward moments.
Monsieur De Treville
On probation
Posts: 7676
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 19:54 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by Monsieur De Treville »

ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 19:06 pm
craviduce wrote: 13 May 2025 17:43 pm
ramfandan wrote: 13 May 2025 17:06 pm From my understanding, the 300+ writers will no determine his fate.
It will be a committee of 16 where he would need 12 of 16 votes.
According to mlb show , consideration won’t be til 2027 and if selected would be for the Class of 2028
isn't that when Albert and Yadi would go into the HOF? THat's great....all they need that weekend is to answer questions about Pete Rose instead of themselves
It would be a weird reporter to ask a newly inducted player his opinion on another and if asked. (If it was me) I would smile replying. ‘ I feel it inappropriate to comment on any other player.
I am very proud to be enshrined today.
End of comment
Well, most reporters I've met are certainly weird.
Clubmaker2
Forum User
Posts: 1447
Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by Clubmaker2 »

anything to justify all the associations and money schemes now developing around gambling. That is all this is.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3036
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Rose and shoeless Joe hof eligible

Post by ecleme22 »

So dumb. Rose deserved a speech
Post Reply