Have to win Tuesday in regulation because the Flames have 3 layups to end the season

[ZouMiz2424]

Vegas and LAK will not be trying and will rest of for the playoffs with nothing to play for

[swatski]

OT win won’t do it?

[ZouMiz2424]

OT win won’t do it?

Not if the flames win their 3 in regulation.

[Bluesfan1978]

San Jose would love to play spoiler. Just need the Flames to have 1 bad game.

[mph6689new]

Getting a point tonight was huge.
Amazingly, Blues still control their destiny with 1 game left.
It’s hard to believe the way we gave back that third period after taking the lead. Just a wacky game. It’s always dangerous playing loose teams with nothing to lose at the end.
Calgary does not have an easy road here.

[ZouMiz2424]

Getting a point tonight was huge.
Amazingly, Blues still control their destiny with 1 game left.
It’s hard to believe the way we gave back that third period after taking the lead. Just a wacky game. It’s always dangerous playing loose teams with nothing to lose at the end.
Calgary does not have an easy road here.

Vegas and LAK are going to throw out AHL teams. All Calgary has to do is beat SJ in regulation

[Peter Wiggin]

At least Utah will be playing 2 nights in a row then they play the Blues.

[ZouMiz2424]

At least Utah will be playing 2 nights in a row then they play the Blues.

.

Hoping their starting goalie plays vs Nashville and we get the backup but it’ll probably be the opposite

[rezero]

OT win won’t do it?

No unless Calgary also wins one in OT as the first tie breaker is RW which they could have 32 so we need to win in regulation.

[Wattage]

OT win won’t do it?

Not if the flames win their 3 in regulation.

Nvm

[swatski]

OT win won’t do it?

No unless Calgary also wins one in OT as the first tie breaker is RW which they could have 32 so we need to win in regulation.

Another thread says if Calgary wins all three in regulation they are in regardless of Blues winning in regulation.

[Wattage]

OT win won’t do it?

No unless Calgary also wins one in OT as the first tie breaker is RW which they could have 32 so we need to win in regulation.

Another thread says if Calgary wins all three in regulation they are in regardless of Blues winning in regulation.

That is incorrect. Blues would be tied in regulation wins and wed have row tiebreaker

[swatski]

OT win won’t do it?

Not if the flames win their 3 in regulation.

Wrong. Overtime win would win. Wed be tied in regulation wins with advantage in row. Overtime LOSS wouldnt do it but winning at all secures our spot.

there are three different threads saying three different things.

[Wattage]

OT win won’t do it?

Not if the flames win their 3 in regulation.

Wrong. Overtime win would win. Wed be tied in regulation wins with advantage in row. Overtime LOSS wouldnt do it but winning at all secures our spot.

there are three different threads saying three different things.

I edited. I did math wrong. We do need regulation win.

[mph6689new]

Possible crazy finish coming Tuesday. Still could absolutely see San Jose win tomorrow, then both Minnesota and STL know they are in before their last game
Still could end up in WC1, WC2, Out.

That third period was a nail biter! So glad they came back to get a point.

[DawgDad]

OT win won’t do it?

No unless Calgary also wins one in OT as the first tie breaker is RW which they could have 32 so we need to win in regulation.

Another thread says if Calgary wins all three in regulation they are in regardless of Blues winning in regulation.

That is incorrect. If the Blues and Calgary win out in regulation they tie on wins and regulation wins but the Blues hold the next tiebreaker, ROW Regulation-Overtime wins.