Is Broberg a player you build around?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2357
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
Lol you guys must be watching a different Broberg than me idk what you are talking about. Broberg is a stud 24 yr old lhd for years to come. He has 170 NHL games he hasn't even scratched the surface. Right now today Broberg may be the Blues best defender. He'd be pacing for 40 pts easy if the Blues had any semblance of offense attack. In no universe is Broberg not worth three or 4x what the Blues paid. Delusional
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
You said best dman since Pronger.
Yup you see weird things
Ask the tat what he thinks
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
I think the comparison to Jaybo is apt. Too many of you base your view of Jaybo on his last year as a Blue. Until Chief took over and Robinson came on board, he was soft as cream cheese back there. When Berube took over, both Parakyo and Jaybo both began to use their strength. Now, neither were big hitters or fighters, traditionally the marks of a “physical” player. However, they became stronger on the stick and suddenly were scary in puck battles, overpowering opposing forwards, be it in the corners, along the boards, or in front and behind the nets. Jaybo played his best hockey as a Blue from when Berube took over until he collapsed on the bench. Broberg has the size and strength to become that same kind of player. Does he have the want to?
-
ChooseBlues
- E-Mail Issues
- Posts: 868
- Joined: 06 Jan 2019 21:22 pm
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
+1Harry S Deals wrote: ↑22 Nov 2025 21:55 pm Lol you guys must be watching a different Broberg than me idk what you are talking about. Broberg is a stud 24 yr old lhd for years to come. He has 170 NHL games he hasn't even scratched the surface. Right now today Broberg may be the Blues best defender. He'd be pacing for 40 pts easy if the Blues had any semblance of offense attack. In no universe is Broberg not worth three or 4x what the Blues paid. Delusional
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
I guess the PP is not in his future. It’s weird.
Maybe he will aspire to be a Jaybo lite
Maybe he will aspire to be a Jaybo lite
-
seattleblue
- Forum User
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
Yup. “Can we win with this guy” is in full test mode right nowseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
They didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
What does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
Well the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
The best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
-
Walter Sobchak00
- Forum User
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
Reason: he'd be playing over 30 a nighttheograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:37 pmThe best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
No that’s not it lolWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:51 pmReason: he'd be playing over 30 a nighttheograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:37 pmThe best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
-
Walter Sobchak00
- Forum User
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
Just had a quick text exchange with DA, he told me the reason Broberg was isn't getting any PP time is there is a moronic troll on the Stltoday forums that needs material to obsess over and attempt to goat people into an arguments. Doug felt if the Blues were to take that away from this freak he feared for the reaction and breaking the last string of sanity this guy has left.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:54 pmNo that’s not it lolWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:51 pmReason: he'd be playing over 30 a nighttheograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:37 pmThe best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
And there you have it straight from the horses mouth...
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
That’s your response to it not being the reason? Because it’s not the reason.Walter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 13:11 pmJust had a quick text exchange with DA, he told me the reason Broberg was isn't getting any PP time is there is a moronic troll on the Stltoday forums that needs material to obsess over and attempt to goat people into an arguments. Doug felt if the Blues were to take that away from this freak he feared for the reaction and breaking the last string of sanity this guy has left.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:54 pmNo that’s not it lolWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:51 pmReason: he'd be playing over 30 a nighttheograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:37 pmThe best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
And there you have it straight from the horses mouth...
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2357
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Is Broberg a player you build around?
There will come a time when Broberg is also manning the point but right now with the weird third pairing decisions Monty has to lean on Broberg and CP so much 5v5 that Broberg cannot play 32 minutes a nightWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 13:11 pmJust had a quick text exchange with DA, he told me the reason Broberg was isn't getting any PP time is there is a moronic troll on the Stltoday forums that needs material to obsess over and attempt to goat people into an arguments. Doug felt if the Blues were to take that away from this freak he feared for the reaction and breaking the last string of sanity this guy has left.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:54 pmNo that’s not it lolWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:51 pmReason: he'd be playing over 30 a nighttheograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:37 pmThe best Defenders rack up points on PP. makar and Hughes have a 1/3 - 1/2 their points on the PP this year. Points don’t just take off at ES typically for defenders. 18-year-old 1st overall Schaefer has about 45% of his points off the PP to start.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 12:27 pmWell the not effective on the PP doesn’t make sense as you would need to have the opportunity to be non effective first.theograce wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:54 amWhat does untapped offensive upside mean? He doesn’t have much of a shot. He’s a rush defender and uses his legs. I’m pretty disappointed he’s not effective on the PP, but is what it is.stlblue06 wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 11:47 amThey didn’t give him over 27 minutes yesterday because Monty was thinking about his next contract. After Colt our defensive options are questionable at best. Broberg is developing into an extremely smart defender with a lot of untapped offensive upsideseattleblue wrote: ↑23 Nov 2025 10:14 am We should acknowledge that right at the moment he is getting a lot of minutes so they can test this very appropriate question before they sign him to a long term deal (which they will).
If it develops the Blues way and he's an anchor defenseman in his performance, I am very open to that. He seems to have a lot more offensive intention than later-career Jaybo. More direct net attacks.
I just mean so far he’s mainly focused on developing his play in his own end. You see spurts of jumping in on the rush or pitching from the point but to me it’s either a confidence issue or he’s simply more concerned about being defensively responsible.
The start of last season is a prime example. If he starts using his speed on rushes or starts scoring some goals, the points will take off.
And I’m guessing there’s reasons they are keeping him off the pp.
And there you have it straight from the horses mouth...