Church over Scott in CF?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

renostl
Forum User
Posts: 4043
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm

Re: Church over Scott in CF?

Post by renostl »

OldRed wrote: 24 Apr 2026 11:05 am
ecleme22 wrote: 24 Apr 2026 10:43 am
OldRed wrote: 24 Apr 2026 10:03 am
ecleme22 wrote: 24 Apr 2026 09:01 am
OldRed wrote: 24 Apr 2026 08:52 am
ecleme22 wrote: 24 Apr 2026 08:43 am
OldRed wrote: 24 Apr 2026 08:38 am
Cranny wrote: 24 Apr 2026 08:35 am Not giving Torres a shot is dumb.
At his age he really doesn't fit into what they are calling a "rebuild".
If he succeeds, he would totally fit a rebuild. Like Garcia w the Rangers.
He will be 29 July 2nd. No, he would not fit a rebuild. But keep fighting the good fight defending every move this team makes and disagreeing with every one of my posts when you are totally wrong most of the time.
Some hypotheticals.

1. Torres is called up, does really well. Plays with the team for 5 years. That's part of the rebuild.
2. Torres is called up, does really well for a year, then is traded for a good, young MLB reliever.

Does a rebuilding team need a producing OFer? Yes. Does a rebuilding team need good bullpen arms? Yes.
My internet has been in and out this morning.

But what you describing is not a rebuild. I would rather see a younger player playing in the outfield than a 29-year-old rookie.
Sure it’s a rebuild. He’s cost controlled, and has more team control than Sagesse.

A rebuild doesn’t necessarily mean finding a 22 year old who can play here for a decade.
Not in my opinion. And I think you totally wrong with what a rebuild really is, it is not playing 29-year-old rookies who haven't proven a thing. I rebelieve all you want to do is argue.
A players opportunity to prove is dependent on getting an opportunity.
Someone has to say bring him up.

Long careers with a single team are idealistic. What is the average length of time that
an utility type player stays on any one team? Donovan got 4 years, Edman 5.

The Cards just signed a 32 y/o utility fielder to an inexpensive $2M. If able to fill such of
a role with a Torres or other old guys Prieto and Mendoza, for 3-4 seasons how does it become a bad thing for the
roster? Do you think either of those players would block a higher ceiling player?
Trust the system. Better and cheaper will always get the opportunity. More often
when teams don't have to pay for a player to go away as they would with an Urias or higher salaried player.
These players are almost throw away at this point in time and the team by playing them just might be playing the better
player as of today. Better should play.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 6324
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: Church over Scott in CF?

Post by Cranny »

Sometimes during a "rebuild" you have to fill in with a few veteran players. Where would we be right now without O'Brien? Some posters unfortunately don't understand that. Also, players peak at different ages. So if a guy like Torres starts to take off at an older age, you have to look at the number of years he's under control rather than his age.
renostl
Forum User
Posts: 4043
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm

Re: Church over Scott in CF?

Post by renostl »

Cranny wrote: 24 Apr 2026 15:16 pm Sometimes during a "rebuild" you have to fill in with a few veteran players. Where would we be right now without O'Brien? Some posters unfortunately don't understand that. Also, players peak at different ages. So if a guy like Torres starts to take off at an older age, you have to look at the number of years he's under control rather than his age.
All true.
riff raff
Forum User
Posts: 3982
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 15:44 pm

Re: Church over Scott in CF?

Post by riff raff »

Church is clearly the better player and it's not even close.

Scott has had his opportunity and hasn't taken advantage of it.
I'm not ready to give up on him though. He needs to go down and improve his hitting.
He was really brought up from AAA too soon out of necessity. That being we literally had no one who could play CF.