Nublues69 wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025 14:48 pm
I was very adamant that DVO was ready this year for center and not just wing.
tonight will be third game i wont claim i am right till game #9
That's no fun, be bold
I think he get's to count his flowers if DVO makes it to game 10. I for one hope he stays. I think I show too much bias in one department but I don't see how Walker should be an everyday guy. Sunny/Walker/Joseph, let those guys rotate and give DVO that 2nd/3rd line energy based off performance.
Nublues69 wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025 14:48 pm
I was very adamant that DVO was ready this year for center and not just wing.
tonight will be third game i wont claim i am right till game #9
In order to be a member of this forum, you have to claim that you are right on all matters, even if you are wrong.
does he not?
No seattle blue i do not. Though i did defend the Mailloux trade stating it was a positional need trade. I also claimed that Carboneau would make the team i was wrong but got dam it he is tearing up the Q.
Nublues69 wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025 14:48 pm
I was very adamant that DVO was ready this year for center and not just wing.
tonight will be third game i wont claim i am right till game #9
In order to be a member of this forum, you have to claim that you are right on all matters, even if you are wrong.
does he not?
No seattle blue i do not. Though i did defend the Mailloux trade stating it was a positional need trade. I also claimed that Carboneau would make the team i was wrong but got dam it he is tearing up the Q.
ok cool glad to hear it. I remember you splashing 'baby Parayko' around here this summer pretty loudly while also being wrong on who dialed in first on the whole Carbonneau of it all.
Nublues69 wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025 14:48 pm
I was very adamant that DVO was ready this year for center and not just wing.
tonight will be third game i wont claim i am right till game #9
In order to be a member of this forum, you have to claim that you are right on all matters, even if you are wrong.
does he not?
No seattle blue i do not. Though i did defend the Mailloux trade stating it was a positional need trade. I also claimed that Carboneau would make the team i was wrong but got dam it he is tearing up the Q.
ok cool glad to hear it. I remember you splashing 'baby Parayko' around here this summer pretty loudly while also being wrong on who dialed in first on the whole Carbonneau of it all.
That came from Jamie rivers man they were high on him and he looked good preseason. Question is... can he be sent down? i think he has more development to do