Re: Hels has lost it
Posted: 10 Jun 2025 18:08 pm
I'm not ready to freak out regarding Helsley just yet, but this is why you don't go extending relievers long term into their 30s.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1513074
How many teams have more than one "real lead off hitter". Why would they be hunting for a rental and willing to give up their "real lead off hitter".imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 16:48 pmI think you are dead wrong. He still has great value.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 16:13 pmHe is also tied for the national league lead in blown saves he may have suitors but they wont be offering much for him
My suggestion?
Package Helsley and Noot for real lead-off hitter.
There are at least two playoff teams who need a left fielder and a closer.
Name them.
Based on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
That’s why a lot of “us” wanted to trade him even for lower level guys.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 18:08 pm I'm not ready to freak out regarding Helsley just yet, but this is why you don't go extending relievers long term into their 30s.
LOLHandsomebachelor wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 20:40 pm![]()
![]()
you read that all these gms were supposedly mad man y'all say anything when things that you want to happen don't and vice versa lol
You think a gm didn't listen to offers that's his job. They at least LISTEN or entertain every offer just to see if it's an offer they can't refuse in all likelihood
Yea because they got so much after helsley had a down year lol and Fedde yea no way they could have got more for him in the off season. Woo even said other baseball executives were shocked Mo and company didn’t want to trade helsley in the offseasonStlcardsblues wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 19:44 pmBased on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
He has a rule about never trading high.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 20:27 pmYea because they got so much after helsley had a down year lol and Fedde yea no way they could have got more for him in the off season. Woo even said other baseball executives were shocked Mo and company didn’t want to trade helsley in the offseasonStlcardsblues wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 19:44 pmBased on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
Mo never commits fully. A proper commit would have been finding an offer Arenado would accept and selling high on Fedde and Helsley. They will have to eat most of Arenado's salary now, they got nothing for Fedde and Helsley didnt improve his value. worst thing about it is the team did it all just to likely miss the playoffs again.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 20:27 pmYea because they got so much after helsley had a down year lol and Fedde yea no way they could have got more for him in the off season. Woo even said other baseball executives were shocked Mo and company didn’t want to trade helsley in the offseasonStlcardsblues wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 19:44 pmBased on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
A basic case of Mo being Mo? Very possible.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 03:12 amMo never commits fully. A proper commit would have been finding an offer Arenado would accept and selling high on Fedde and Helsley. They will have to eat most of Arenado's salary now, they got nothing for Fedde and Helsley didnt improve his value. worst thing about it is the team did it all just to likely miss the playoffs again.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 20:27 pmYea because they got so much after helsley had a down year lol and Fedde yea no way they could have got more for him in the off season. Woo even said other baseball executives were shocked Mo and company didn’t want to trade helsley in the offseasonStlcardsblues wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 19:44 pmBased on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
That’s a valid point. Sell the popular closer prior to a reset season might tank the gates.Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 08:03 amA basic case of Mo being Mo? Very possible.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 03:12 amMo never commits fully. A proper commit would have been finding an offer Arenado would accept and selling high on Fedde and Helsley. They will have to eat most of Arenado's salary now, they got nothing for Fedde and Helsley didnt improve his value. worst thing about it is the team did it all just to likely miss the playoffs again.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑15 Aug 2025 20:27 pmYea because they got so much after helsley had a down year lol and Fedde yea no way they could have got more for him in the off season. Woo even said other baseball executives were shocked Mo and company didn’t want to trade helsley in the offseasonStlcardsblues wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 19:44 pmBased on the Williams trade, I don’t believe the offers were good.Horseradish wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:26 amDon’t be obtuse, you know there were trades to be made if they tried.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2025 07:19 amWhat was the offer they should have taken?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2025 21:16 pm Should have been traded in the offseason at peak value easy obvious correct
Or, a situation where Dewitt II or Dewitt III ordered him not to sell off Helsley (especially) or Fedde? After all, w/o Helsley's mlb-leading 2024 effort, StL would have arguably been a sub-.500 team. Fans appreciated that notion, and if he were traded asap, how might it affect fan perceptions, i.e., ticket sales, for 25?
The genius fans knew seven years ago when he was brought up.