Simon Nemec
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Simon Nemec
I think my final thought on Nemec is I just couldn't trade team controled proven players for him. Best I could do is a package of really good but also unproven prospects.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:26 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Simon Nemec
Nemec is only 21 could be a franchise player steal another coup for Army. He could gel with Pekarcik and Dvorsky and anchor the right side for years however .... in no sane universe would you trade Jordan Kyrou for Nemec, Devils likely need to get tougher harder on the forecheck etc they may want a guy like Neighbours, tough pill to swallow for me for a kid that hasnt shown a ton of progress yet
Re: Simon Nemec
Agreed. The only way you trade a proven NHL player for one who might not develop into one is if they are sweetening the deal.
Re: Simon Nemec
Exactly right.
Bolduc or Neighbors??? Really?
It's NOT time for risk making moves for this player imo.
Re: Simon Nemec
4 points in 27 games? Why the H.E. double hockey sticks would you think trading Kyrou for this guy is a good idea?
What is wrong with you people?
36 goals 70 points and plus 23. for 4 points. Really ridiculous. Stop it!!
What is wrong with you people?
36 goals 70 points and plus 23. for 4 points. Really ridiculous. Stop it!!
Re: Simon Nemec
Well it could easily turn into a steal so that is why its appealing but just to much risk I think.
I mean this is a #2 overall RD....That is a VERY appealing player.
Re: Simon Nemec
Key word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: Simon Nemec
Re: Simon Nemec
Yeah thats what I said but that could also turn out to be very wrong.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:37 amKey word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
Re: Simon Nemec
Oh sure, of course. I’d just rather go by ‘bird in the hand’ for now at least. We’re finally making strides to ultimately get where we want, let’s not stub our toeskilles wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:48 amYeah thats what I said but that could also turn out to be very wrong.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:37 amKey word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Simon Nemec
now if you are talking a NJ ups the offer to something like Nemec, Dawson Mercer, and a forward, now we might be getting somewhere.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:54 amOh sure, of course. I’d just rather go by ‘bird in the hand’ for now at least. We’re finally making strides to ultimately get where we want, let’s not stub our toeskilles wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:48 amYeah thats what I said but that could also turn out to be very wrong.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:37 amKey word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
NJ has Hughes and Hischier as their 1-2 at center, and other options at Center so losing Mercer wouldn't effect them much. Mercer has a 56 point season to his resume just 2 seasons ago, is only 23, he is signed the next 2 seasons at 4 million, but his points have seen a dip the past 2 seasons so he is very much a candidate for a rebound.
Now I'm not saying that is a package worth Kyrou, but it might be worth a young established forward and an established or NHL ready dman as a starter.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 203
- Joined: 24 May 2024 08:39 am
Re: Simon Nemec
While we are at it maybe we can dust off the rights to Sergio Momesso, Cliff Ronning, Geoff Courtnall, and Robert Dirk to throw in with it. Yes I am exaggerating more than a little but honestly that is a pretty lop sided deal a first line scoring winger for a guy who had what four points in 2 games.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 976
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Simon Nemec
When I said the deal shouldn't be primarily 1-for-1 because that's an awkward deal, it was a larger deal like this that I had in mind. We would not just get a prospect we'd also get a roster player and also probably be sending more than Kyrou whether it's also a prospect or pick (debate as to what that should be is open question).TheJackBurton wrote: ↑13 May 2025 10:17 amnow if you are talking a NJ ups the offer to something like Nemec, Dawson Mercer, and a forward, now we might be getting somewhere.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:54 amOh sure, of course. I’d just rather go by ‘bird in the hand’ for now at least. We’re finally making strides to ultimately get where we want, let’s not stub our toeskilles wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:48 amYeah thats what I said but that could also turn out to be very wrong.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:37 amKey word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
NJ has Hughes and Hischier as their 1-2 at center, and other options at Center so losing Mercer wouldn't effect them much. Mercer has a 56 point season to his resume just 2 seasons ago, is only 23, he is signed the next 2 seasons at 4 million, but his points have seen a dip the past 2 seasons so he is very much a candidate for a rebound.
Now I'm not saying that is a package worth Kyrou, but it might be worth a young established forward and an established or NHL ready dman as a starter.
By the exact same logic that says Mercer is spare on a team that already has multiple players, the Blues have seemingly just hit on their top draft picks from 2021 and 2022 and they're both players who play Kyrou's position.
I'm not saying Mercer specifically, just that I agree with the instinct that this kind of deal where we're targeting a high end RHD prospect or young unproven player it's going to take more than a primary 1-for-1.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 904
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Simon Nemec
Where is Kyrou today as we speak...
Kyrou is a regular season 1-line winger, and a playoff season 2-line winger that has a history of getting soft.
What is the value of an overpaid regular season scorer that may be permanently mind-altered by Logan Stanley?
But, yeah, let's go ahead and exchange him for a 2022 TOP5 pick with a few question marks on his helmet.
No way that we get that much for Kyrou. Teams want players that turn it up in the playoffs, not disappear.
Kyrou is a regular season 1-line winger, and a playoff season 2-line winger that has a history of getting soft.
What is the value of an overpaid regular season scorer that may be permanently mind-altered by Logan Stanley?
But, yeah, let's go ahead and exchange him for a 2022 TOP5 pick with a few question marks on his helmet.
No way that we get that much for Kyrou. Teams want players that turn it up in the playoffs, not disappear.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:32 pm
Re: Simon Nemec
I have heard somewhere, maybe here, that the point totals for Dawson & Mercer or one of the two may have suffered from lack of offensively skilled linemates. Do you know anything about that?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑13 May 2025 10:17 amnow if you are talking a NJ ups the offer to something like Nemec, Dawson Mercer, and a forward, now we might be getting somewhere.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:54 amOh sure, of course. I’d just rather go by ‘bird in the hand’ for now at least. We’re finally making strides to ultimately get where we want, let’s not stub our toeskilles wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:48 amYeah thats what I said but that could also turn out to be very wrong.netboy65 wrote: ↑13 May 2025 09:37 amKey word in your response is “could”. We’re not yet in a position to take such a risk. Maybe in a couple years
NJ has Hughes and Hischier as their 1-2 at center, and other options at Center so losing Mercer wouldn't effect them much. Mercer has a 56 point season to his resume just 2 seasons ago, is only 23, he is signed the next 2 seasons at 4 million, but his points have seen a dip the past 2 seasons so he is very much a candidate for a rebound.
Now I'm not saying that is a package worth Kyrou, but it might be worth a young established forward and an established or NHL ready dman as a starter.
I'll also add that Kyrou is too good and established to trade for anything less than a package deal if the return is young players and prospects yet to prove anything. Now Rantanen or a 1b/2a C or a top pairing RD is a different story.