Re: We are watching a AAA team
Posted: 16 Aug 2025 07:29 am
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1515248
That's also where I had them.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 07:39 am My prediction thread had them at 81-81. I’m certainly on track.
Yea they have done themselves well considering the challenges. There’s not a lot of difference between first and last place, when talking talent levels. So just a couple more good pieces, out of a pool of 780 active players, will make that difference between first and last.OldRed wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 08:14 amThat's also where I had them.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 07:39 am My prediction thread had them at 81-81. I’m certainly on track.
You apparently have a troll!OldRed wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 08:14 amThat's also where I had them.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 07:39 am My prediction thread had them at 81-81. I’m certainly on track.
And it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.
Interesting question?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 amBut in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?
So, just a random trolling bump so you can keep it going, or just your insatiable need to have the last word?Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 16:58 pmAnd it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.
If it bothers you, AEP, there’s always the ignore function. Easy to use.AnExParrot wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:46 pmSo, just a random trolling bump so you can keep it going, or just your insatiable need to have the last word?Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 16:58 pmAnd it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.
Next time you feel the need to castigate someone for what they post, remember what you said there^.Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:52 pmIf it bothers you, AEP, there’s always the ignore function. Easy to use.AnExParrot wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:46 pmSo, just a random trolling bump so you can keep it going, or just your insatiable need to have the last word?Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 16:58 pmAnd it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.
WHAT? after all the year you didn't use he "quote" function . . . . LOL!Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:52 pmIf it bothers you, AEP, there’s always the ignore function. Easy to use.AnExParrot wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:46 pmSo, just a random trolling bump so you can keep it going, or just your insatiable need to have the last word?Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 16:58 pmAnd it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.
Of course I did for the obvious troll, Red……… but not for you. You have two personae - a very nice person watching practice with me in Jupiter, and a different type of person on here. Can you explain that? I’ll opt for the real you.OldRed wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:55 pmWHAT? after all the year you didn't use he "quote" function . . . . LOL!Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:52 pmIf it bothers you, AEP, there’s always the ignore function. Easy to use.AnExParrot wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 17:46 pmSo, just a random trolling bump so you can keep it going, or just your insatiable need to have the last word?Cranny wrote: ↑16 Aug 2025 16:58 pmAnd it still holds true, as has been said by other posters.