STLtoday.com

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 08:57 am

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 09:15 am

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 08:57 am

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

Transition year Red. I don't like losing any more than anyone else on here, but I always try to look for something positive that could affect the future for the Cardinals. It's why I follow the minor leagues so closely. And why right now I'm looking forward to Bloom taking the reins in several months. Granted, things had gotten stale.
So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.

I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 09:15 am

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 08:57 am

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.

I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 09:15 am

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 08:57 am

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.

I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.

sdaltons wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 11:19 am

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 09:15 am

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 08:57 am

Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:04 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

As I’ve said before, Cranny is a Cardinal front office drone who monitors this site. No casual fan be that vehement and clueless.

Vehement as a fan? Guilty. I believe in cheering for the home team.
Clueless? Because I don't jump into all the negativity? Guilty of that too.

I cheer for them also. I just make comments on what I see. It is not being negative, it is being logical appraising the team I have cheered for over 70 years. I just can walk away from wanting to win and play well and commenting when they don't. I'm the real fan and don't live in a fantasy world of make believe.

Cranny is like the meme of the dog in the house that is burning down saying, "this is fine."

lidstrom5 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:12 am And getting beat by the Rockies Double A team.

WLTFE wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 15:21 pm

lidstrom5 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:12 am And getting beat by the Rockies Double A team.

And the attendance was proof of Mo-rans incompetence.

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 18:31 pm

WLTFE wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 15:21 pm

lidstrom5 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:12 am And getting beat by the Rockies Double A team.

And the attendance was proof of Mo-rans incompetence.

++

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 18:31 pm

WLTFE wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 15:21 pm

lidstrom5 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:12 am And getting beat by the Rockies Double A team.

And the attendance was proof of Mo-rans incompetence.

++

Cranny wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:47 pm

OldRed wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 18:31 pm

WLTFE wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 15:21 pm

lidstrom5 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:12 am And getting beat by the Rockies Double A team.

And the attendance was proof of Mo-rans incompetence.

++

Anything positive, Red?

WLTFE wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 10:25 am

NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:41 am

Cranny wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 22:52 pm The answer is that even though you have someone on ignore, their posts still show up if they’re on a chain of posts. But you already knew that.

But in the two examples I cited, you directly quote-replied to WLTFE within minutes of his post, there was no intervening “chain of posts.” As a purely technical matter, it’s impossible to directly quote-reply to a post on this forum without first being able to see/read it. But if he’s on your Foe List and you were truly ignoring him, you wouldn’t have been able to see those original posts, and therefore you wouldn’t have been able to directly quote-reply to them within minutes.

So once again, if he’s on your Foe List and you’re adhering to the mods’ “demand” that you ignore him, how did you manage to directly quote-reply to him like that?

<Crickets>

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.