Lol you’re complaining about making him the highest paid player in Blues history while ignoring the circumstance that’s driving it (the rising cap). That’s what sticker shock means bro!theograce wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 11:59 amNo it’s not sticker shock at all. It’s about player assessment and making him earn the highest contract in franchise history. Because they are playing him more? Because he skates well? There’s propaganda right now. If Montgomery truly thinks Broberg can take over games right now…he’s back on the sauce. Tell me one game he took over. I wanna watch it lol.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 08:38 am You’re just getting sticker shock because of the rising cap.
You can point to the cap increase all you like, but that’s not the point. Buchnevich is getting 8 per long term in part to them seeing a cap rise, but that’s doesn’t make it good when you compare to peers.
Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
-
seattleblue
- Forum User
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
You’re laughing out loud because the only thing you keep saying is the cap is rising? Don’t make players earn contracts because the cap is rising? That’s your argument?The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 12:25 pmLol you’re complaining about making him the highest paid player in Blues history while ignoring the circumstance that’s driving it (the rising cap). That’s what sticker shock means bro!theograce wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 11:59 amNo it’s not sticker shock at all. It’s about player assessment and making him earn the highest contract in franchise history. Because they are playing him more? Because he skates well? There’s propaganda right now. If Montgomery truly thinks Broberg can take over games right now…he’s back on the sauce. Tell me one game he took over. I wanna watch it lol.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 08:38 am You’re just getting sticker shock because of the rising cap.
You can point to the cap increase all you like, but that’s not the point. Buchnevich is getting 8 per long term in part to them seeing a cap rise, but that’s doesn’t make it good when you compare to peers.
-
MrPostman01
- Forum User
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Hey Opie,
I'm not Petro
My name is Monty
Petro left you years ago
My team is St. Louie Blue
But Petro chose to leave you
'His mangled body brings back your disgrace
[Verse]
He was your morning light
His smile told of no night
Your love for him grew
With each rising sun
And then one winter day
His greed led him away
He left you here
Drowning in your tears
Here, where you've stayed for years
Crying Petro, Petro
[Chorus]
I'm not Petro
My name is Monty
Petro left you years ago
My team is St. Louie Blue
But Petro chose to leave you
'His mangled body brings back your disgrace
[Outro]
I'm not Petro
I'm not Petro
My name is Monty
Petro left you years ago
My team is St. Louie Blue
But Petro chose to leave you
'His mangled body brings back your disgrace
[Verse]
He was your morning light
His smile told of no night
Your love for him grew
With each rising sun
And then one winter day
His greed led him away
He left you here
Drowning in your tears
Here, where you've stayed for years
Crying Petro, Petro
[Chorus]
I'm not Petro
My name is Monty
Petro left you years ago
My team is St. Louie Blue
But Petro chose to leave you
'His mangled body brings back your disgrace
[Outro]
I'm not Petro
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Hutson as a 20-year-old
66 points (pacing for 70 this year)
123 blocks (pacing for ver 130 this year)
Runs a pp
Plays when the game is on the line at a deficit
Broberg as a 24 year old
Pacing for 30 points
135 blocks
Doesn’t sniff a pp
Doesn’t play when the game is on the line at a deficit
But hey…the cap is going up lol
66 points (pacing for 70 this year)
123 blocks (pacing for ver 130 this year)
Runs a pp
Plays when the game is on the line at a deficit
Broberg as a 24 year old
Pacing for 30 points
135 blocks
Doesn’t sniff a pp
Doesn’t play when the game is on the line at a deficit
But hey…the cap is going up lol
-
Walter Sobchak00
- Forum User
- Posts: 417
- Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
theograce wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 13:04 pm Hutson as a 20-year-old
66 points (pacing for 70 this year)
123 blocks (pacing for ver 130 this year)
Runs a pp
Plays when the game is on the line at a deficit
Broberg as a 24 year old
Pacing for 30 points
135 blocks
Doesn’t sniff a pp
Doesn’t play when the game is on the line at a deficit
But hey…the cap is going up lol

-
ShakeyWalton
- Forum User
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 27 May 2024 13:22 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Can you imagine how weak this guy is in life? It's the holidays and sports are red hot right now, and the guy can't do anything but find negativity. A sad, lonely, submissive, simp of a guy.Walter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 13:43 pmtheograce wrote: ↑03 Dec 2025 13:04 pm Hutson as a 20-year-old
66 points (pacing for 70 this year)
123 blocks (pacing for ver 130 this year)
Runs a pp
Plays when the game is on the line at a deficit
Broberg as a 24 year old
Pacing for 30 points
135 blocks
Doesn’t sniff a pp
Doesn’t play when the game is on the line at a deficit
But hey…the cap is going up lol![]()
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
It is? Which ones?
-
PregnantNun
- Forum User
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 18 Nov 2025 20:29 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Not millions. Just one million. Are you such an expert of the NHL market for defensemen that you are willing to invest this much time trolling over a 1M discrepancy between your opinion and what he might hypothetically get? I don't see the difference. This team has much bigger problems than whether they spend 7M vs 8M on Broberg.theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:34 pmIt’s about assessment, term, and principle. Yes millions. It’s not your money so it doesn’t matter?PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
I’ve clearly talked about term here. Yes many millions. Maybe you missed that. Calling me a troll over questioning the great Broberg.PregnantNun wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:04 pmNot millions. Just one million. Are you such an expert of the NHL market for defensemen that you are willing to invest this much time trolling over a 1M discrepancy between your opinion and what he might hypothetically get? I don't see the difference. This team has much bigger problems than whether they spend 7M vs 8M on Broberg.theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:34 pmIt’s about assessment, term, and principle. Yes millions. It’s not your money so it doesn’t matter?PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
You ok?
-
Walter Sobchak00
- Forum User
- Posts: 417
- Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
theograce wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:15 pmI’ve clearly talked about term here. Yes many millions. Maybe you missed that. Calling me a troll over questioning the great Broberg.PregnantNun wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:04 pmNot millions. Just one million. Are you such an expert of the NHL market for defensemen that you are willing to invest this much time trolling over a 1M discrepancy between your opinion and what he might hypothetically get? I don't see the difference. This team has much bigger problems than whether they spend 7M vs 8M on Broberg.theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:34 pmIt’s about assessment, term, and principle. Yes millions. It’s not your money so it doesn’t matter?PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
You ok?

Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
-
PregnantNun
- Forum User
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 18 Nov 2025 20:29 pm
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
I'm tremendous. You?theograce wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:15 pmI’ve clearly talked about term here. Yes many millions. Maybe you missed that. Calling me a troll over questioning the great Broberg.PregnantNun wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:04 pmNot millions. Just one million. Are you such an expert of the NHL market for defensemen that you are willing to invest this much time trolling over a 1M discrepancy between your opinion and what he might hypothetically get? I don't see the difference. This team has much bigger problems than whether they spend 7M vs 8M on Broberg.theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:34 pmIt’s about assessment, term, and principle. Yes millions. It’s not your money so it doesn’t matter?PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
You ok?
Re: Montgomery already justifying the dollars
I’ll be better if Broberg takes over a game like Montgomery says he doesPregnantNun wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 17:30 pmI'm tremendous. You?theograce wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:15 pmI’ve clearly talked about term here. Yes many millions. Maybe you missed that. Calling me a troll over questioning the great Broberg.PregnantNun wrote: ↑04 Dec 2025 14:04 pmNot millions. Just one million. Are you such an expert of the NHL market for defensemen that you are willing to invest this much time trolling over a 1M discrepancy between your opinion and what he might hypothetically get? I don't see the difference. This team has much bigger problems than whether they spend 7M vs 8M on Broberg.theograce wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:34 pmIt’s about assessment, term, and principle. Yes millions. It’s not your money so it doesn’t matter?PregnantNun wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025 12:21 pm So all this trolling is because you think he might hypothetically get offered 8 when you feel it should be closer to 7? That's it?
You ok?
Laughing