Page 3 of 3

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 12:58 pm
by Rojo Johnson
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:38 pm
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:26 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:07 am Mo has left C. Bloom with a mess in the OF.

I'm not sure any of the one's we're seeing this season even finish the year starting in the OF in 2026.

The OF has been a disgrace for too many years, hopefully through some smart trades and (small) FA signings Bloom can repair the Mo Mess.
Moe’s parade of OF deplorables over the past decade should have caused him to be best friends with Dr. Tar and Mr. Feather. The guy is a raving moron when it comes to player assessment. A joke of an evaluator. Just like his managers evaluations. How can a guy who is so bad at his job critique upcoming players?
Mo has almost singlehandedly e f f e d up this organization.

From horrible free agent signings to pitiful extensions to hiring terrible Managers he's wrecked the Rolls Royce Walt handed him.

But in reality it's all BDWJr's fault!

He could've ended this reign of ineptness years ago by firing Mo.
Completely agree. Bill’s partners ought to sue him for damages resulting from his negligence in ignoring the incompetence occurring right before our very eyes. Moe has pizzed away millions of $ in franchise value over the last 5-7 years.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 13:05 pm
by rockondlouie
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:58 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:38 pm
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:26 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:07 am Mo has left C. Bloom with a mess in the OF.

I'm not sure any of the one's we're seeing this season even finish the year starting in the OF in 2026.

The OF has been a disgrace for too many years, hopefully through some smart trades and (small) FA signings Bloom can repair the Mo Mess.
Moe’s parade of OF deplorables over the past decade should have caused him to be best friends with Dr. Tar and Mr. Feather. The guy is a raving moron when it comes to player assessment. A joke of an evaluator. Just like his managers evaluations. How can a guy who is so bad at his job critique upcoming players?
Mo has almost singlehandedly e f f e d up this organization.

From horrible free agent signings to pitiful extensions to hiring terrible Managers he's wrecked the Rolls Royce Walt handed him.

But in reality it's all BDWJr's fault!

He could've ended this reign of ineptness years ago by firing Mo.
Completely agree. Bill’s partners ought to sue him for damages resulting from his negligence in ignoring the incompetence occurring right before our very eyes. Moe has pizzed away millions of $ in franchise value over the last 5-7 years.
The scary thing RoJo?

If they did remove Bill as managing partner, then we'd get BDWIII or as I labeled him, FREDO. 8O

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 13:07 pm
by IndCard75
If I’m Bloom I would take offers for Noot Burly and Donovan this offseason for pitching and or prospects. Nothing against those 3 players however we aren’t winning the division with them so we might as well blow it up. It’s a very sort sample but to me Church seems like Scott but potentially a better hitter. Next year start Walker Scott and Church in the OF with Herrera getting some starts out there too.

Unless DeWitt is going to open the wallet and allow Bloom to sign Schwarber for LF DH… but we all know that’s probably not happening.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 13:09 pm
by Bomber1
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:58 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:38 pm
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:26 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:07 am Mo has left C. Bloom with a mess in the OF.

I'm not sure any of the one's we're seeing this season even finish the year starting in the OF in 2026.

The OF has been a disgrace for too many years, hopefully through some smart trades and (small) FA signings Bloom can repair the Mo Mess.
Moe’s parade of OF deplorables over the past decade should have caused him to be best friends with Dr. Tar and Mr. Feather. The guy is a raving moron when it comes to player assessment. A joke of an evaluator. Just like his managers evaluations. How can a guy who is so bad at his job critique upcoming players?
Mo has almost singlehandedly e f f e d up this organization.

From horrible free agent signings to pitiful extensions to hiring terrible Managers he's wrecked the Rolls Royce Walt handed him.

But in reality it's all BDWJr's fault!

He could've ended this reign of ineptness years ago by firing Mo.
Completely agree. Bill’s partners ought to sue him for damages resulting from his negligence in ignoring the incompetence occurring right before our very eyes. Moe has pizzed away millions of $ in franchise value over the last 5-7 years.
Mozeliak has continued to be employed for the Cardinals for one reason - HackGate.

You guys keep saying “DeWitt could have and should have canned Mozeliak years ago”.

Mozeliak had DeWitt over the barrel. No way in h e l l would DeWitt allow himself to be found complicit in a Federal Crime.

Dewitt knows and has known that Mozeliak is useless and in fact an albatross in his job.

He just couldn’t do anything about it until Mozeliak decided to call it quits.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 13:59 pm
by ilcubuffs
The possibility or potential of an OF Church - Scott - Walker/Noots is enticing. Athletic, speed, quick, and above avg defense.

Scott needs to learn bunting, Church adjusts to MLB pitching, and Noots staying on field and improve hitting.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 14:59 pm
by 82birds
Rojo Johnson wrote: 23 Aug 2025 12:26 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:07 am Mo has left C. Bloom with a mess in the OF.

I'm not sure any of the one's we're seeing this season even finish the year starting in the OF in 2026.

The OF has been a disgrace for too many years, hopefully through some smart trades and (small) FA signings Bloom can repair the Mo Mess.
Moe’s parade of OF deplorables over the past decade should have caused him to be best friends with Dr. Tar and Mr. Feather. The guy is a raving moron when it comes to player assessment. A joke of an evaluator. Just like his managers evaluations. How can a guy who is so bad at his job critique upcoming players?
bingo, Rojo. all of that ! every word.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 15:40 pm
by hugeCardfan
Wattage wrote: 23 Aug 2025 11:35 am
hugeCardfan wrote: 23 Aug 2025 10:59 am
Wattage wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:36 am
hugeCardfan wrote: 23 Aug 2025 09:27 am
EastCoastDave wrote: 23 Aug 2025 05:47 am It’s been fun watching Nathan Church over the past couple of series, especially last night when he got his first hit and first homer. He’s played superb defense in center and has showed off his very strong arm. Watching last night, I began thinking that I’d like to see more of him the rest of the year. But that would mean that Victor Scott II would see less time when he returns from IL, likely stunting his development. I’ve no idea how either player will develop over the next several years, but I like both players. Each plays very good defense, which is essential for a center fielder. I don’t know enough about Church’s minor league career, but I do wonder why he’s getting to the majors at age 25. Scott is 24 with a couple of years of experience in the Majors. Is Church worth a look as an everyday player at the expense of Scott? Where does Church fit in with the Cards? Given Church’s age, it seems that if he’s not in Majors next year, he’ll never make here. Agree?
College drafted players usually don't make it to the majors until 24-6. Church is more adept at hitting than Scott and seems to be about as fast with better arm. There is no reason he won't make it; the bat plays.

I like Scott as well, but he needs to work on hitting. Defense only won't make him stand out.
That is yet to be proven. And yes church hit better in the minors thos year than scott- but at an older age than scott is currently and this year came out of nowhere. Church had a .705 ops at AA in 2024 and in 2023 .724 ops in A+ ball.

Before this year, there was nothing to suggest church could hit at all.
You probably believe that despite how untrue it really is. Everybody can read a statline. Church was known for his good contact, selective swings and line drives in HS and college. Limited power which would grow as he progressed in professional ball was his only shortcoming.

After drafted he was thrown into the PB lineup and he struggled as most players do. But his improvement over his 90 plus bats was such that they moved him to Peoria for '23. .279 .364 .360 .724 was respectable enough to promote him to AA for '24 though he was told to develop some power. He tripled his HR output from 3 to 9 with a respectable .268 .331 .373 .704 while becoming recognized as a remarkable fielder. He showed the fielding off in ST of '25 and was sent back to the minors to work on developing power.

It all came together in '25 with .329 .386 .524 .910 accumulated between AA and AAA...equally brilliant at both stops. He never skipped a beat in AAA. 5 triples and 13 HRs in 347 ABs. His contact did not suffer while his exit velocity soared.

His hitting prowess is only a surprise to stat line readers. He is a hitting dude, and, IMO, will adapt quickly to the majors.
Scott and church

In 2023 scott hit .303 across A+ and AA hitting better at AA than church did at A+ that year despite scott being a year younger. Only difference is we then rushed scott up to the majors in 2024 and he wasnt yet ready.


Both were drafted same year and scott hit better and was promoted faster.
You want to play stats? Fine, let's play. 2024 Memphis: Scott (314 AB's: .210 .294 .303 .597 ) 2025 Memphis: Church (215 AB's .335 .400 .521 .921 ) You can keep Scott down in Memphis until the cows come home and he's never going to have a .921 OPS. Church had a .943 OPS in Springfield. Not a fluke.

Listen, I'm not gonna argue with you. Let's see who can hit in the majors. That's all that really matters.

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 23 Aug 2025 16:49 pm
by cosmo.kramer
Church in his 20 PA has faced the highest avg fastball velocity of any player in the league

Church 96.6
Harris 95.9
Teodosio 95.7
Del Castillo 95.7
Lawlar 95.6
League avg 94.3

I remember the Marlins had absolute flamethrowers. So it seems his beginning may have been influenced by abnormally high velo thus far. Guessing the hits will start to fall more as he gets comfortable and as he faces relatively easier velo

Edit: Looks like change up and slider, he's also at the top. That Marlins staff in particular was crazy

Re: Church vs. Scott

Posted: 25 Aug 2025 01:44 am
by govman
JDW wrote: 23 Aug 2025 07:13 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 23 Aug 2025 07:03 am
JDW wrote: 23 Aug 2025 07:01 am VS2 has overall been fine in CF.
Maybe instead it should be Church vs. Noot, or Church vs. Burleson.
An OF defense of Church-VS2-Noot would be a really good one.
The argument against defense is, they can’t hit. But if the other team can’t score, then a mediocre hitting team has a chance.
+ Defense and + base running help win games. The path to the SB is easier now. When do the Cards learn to take advantage of this?
The Brewers learned.
Although ridiculously early to try and project Church, Nathan looks to be a guy who accumulates WAR well, where plus defense and base running IS accounted for.
More SB's and less gidp's for the offense, combined with more defensive runs saved.
Which other team would have a better defensive OF than the Cards with that alignment?
Funny thing is, the SP's then look a little better than they really are, with lesser pitch counts/inning.
"path to the SB"--are we talking football or baseball here?