The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 926
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by desertrat23 »

Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
The industry has changed since they won those WS. They have to choose to change with it or become irrelevant. They've chosen the latter.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 4209
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by Cranny »

Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 926
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by desertrat23 »

Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:19 pm
Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
Yes. 2006: Suppan, 2011: Berkman. I struggle to call those guys "elite," but they're what put the team over the top.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 4209
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by Cranny »

desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:24 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:19 pm
Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
Yes. 2006: Suppan, 2011: Berkman. I struggle to call those guys "elite," but they're what put the team over the top.
If the Cardinals signed guys like that today, CT would scour them.
butsir01
Forum User
Posts: 1037
Joined: 23 May 2024 20:36 pm

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by butsir01 »

Take Miles and Eric for two nights running.
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 926
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by desertrat23 »

Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 21:18 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:24 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:19 pm
Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
Yes. 2006: Suppan, 2011: Berkman. I struggle to call those guys "elite," but they're what put the team over the top.
If the Cardinals signed guys like that today, CT would scour them.
I guess that would all depend on how they and the team perform, wouldn't it?
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 4209
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by Cranny »

desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 21:48 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 21:18 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:24 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:19 pm
Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:23 pmSheesh, what a waste of time on a busy Monday.
Why don’t you look at the trades they have made that prove what BDW, Jr. was saying - Holliday, Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, etc. They prefer trades to FA signings. They have ever since BDW, Jr. and other investors bought the team. When they strayed from it with Fowler, Leake, Cecil, etc. it only proved their point more.
No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
Yes. 2006: Suppan, 2011: Berkman. I struggle to call those guys "elite," but they're what put the team over the top.
If the Cardinals signed guys like that today, CT would scour them.
I guess that would all depend on how they and the team perform, wouldn't it?
I was referring to the time of signing.
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 926
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: The Cardinals with Kyle Tucker.

Post by desertrat23 »

Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 22:30 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 21:48 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 21:18 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:24 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:19 pm
Goldfan wrote: 30 Jun 2025 19:09 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 18:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 17:30 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 16:34 pm
Quincy Varnish wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 30 Jun 2025 15:13 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 30 Jun 2025 14:56 pm

No one is disputing that DeWitt said that. And no one is disputing that they prefer trades to FAs. What we’re saying is this:

1. You can’t be truly successful without being successful at a high level in the FA market in 2025.
2. If DeWitt and his team can’t hit on free agents when they do “stray,” they need to change their FA evaluation process and/or find people who CAN be successful at evaluating and signing free agents.
No. Actually what I see are several trades to fill any large holes. As I’ve said (sorry to be redundant again), the only FA action you’ll see are short term free agent contracts with relievers and with older guys aka Berkman and Beltran. But huge long term FA contracts for guys in their prime? - Naw. Not going to happen.
If you were less disingenuous about the reasons for the above truths, you’d be met with less opposition.

They don’t have a real chance at signing top free agents, and cannot afford the risk of getting it wrong if they do.
Disingenuous? By telling the truth about what the Cardinals have said? LOL.
Yes… it’s a bit disingenuous to suggest the Cardinals aren’t signing top FA because they prefer to see how a player fits with the team. They aren’t signing top FAs because it’s not financially prudent in their market. That is the only real reason.
The Cardinals have had a different business plan than your FA plan for many years, Quincy. Build through the system and trade to fill holes as needed. It’s brought them a ton of winning seasons and 2 World Championships this century. Don’t expect it to change.
Why are BDW/MO more than happy to overpay on middling talent rather than put eggs in the Elite basket and fill in internally. An elite player or 2 HAS BEEN what put the Cards over the top when they won those 2 WS this Century
And where did those elite player or two come from?
Free agents that were bought?
Yes. 2006: Suppan, 2011: Berkman. I struggle to call those guys "elite," but they're what put the team over the top.
If the Cardinals signed guys like that today, CT would scour them.
I guess that would all depend on how they and the team perform, wouldn't it?
I was referring to the time of signing.
I’d love to come up with a witty rejoinder, but this is impossible to argue with.
Post Reply