GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Ready for the really bad news?
Minnesota has built their team on their Round 1 draft picks.
St Louis hasn't. Army's best prospects are by far the prospects that they got from Edmonton via offer sheets.
Minnesota has proven that they can build through the draft.
St Louis has proven that they can't.
With a rising cap, teams will have to rely more and more on the NHL draft.
Which YOUNG NHL draft prospects would you rather have?
Minnesota
Boldy, Kaprizov, Rossi, Buium
St Louis
Snuggerud, Neighbors, Mailloux (acquired via Bolduc)
Army IS NOT BUILDING VIA THE DRAFT, and the losses to MN are going to continue into the future.
Thanks Army.
Minnesota has built their team on their Round 1 draft picks.
St Louis hasn't. Army's best prospects are by far the prospects that they got from Edmonton via offer sheets.
Minnesota has proven that they can build through the draft.
St Louis has proven that they can't.
With a rising cap, teams will have to rely more and more on the NHL draft.
Which YOUNG NHL draft prospects would you rather have?
Minnesota
Boldy, Kaprizov, Rossi, Buium
St Louis
Snuggerud, Neighbors, Mailloux (acquired via Bolduc)
Army IS NOT BUILDING VIA THE DRAFT, and the losses to MN are going to continue into the future.
Thanks Army.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Are you really going to faceplant this Kaprizov draft position thing again
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 566
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Well, the Wild spent the whole off season trying to trade Rossi. So if you are asking if I prefer their four guys to Thomas, Kyrou, Neighbours and Snuggerud, I’d take the latter.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 12:54 pm Ready for the really bad news?
Minnesota has built their team on their Round 1 draft picks.
St Louis hasn't. Army's best prospects are by far the prospects that they got from Edmonton via offer sheets.
Minnesota has proven that they can build through the draft.
St Louis has proven that they can't.
With a rising cap, teams will have to rely more and more on the NHL draft.
Which YOUNG NHL draft prospects would you rather have?
Minnesota
Boldy, Kaprizov, Rossi, Buium
St Louis
Snuggerud, Neighbors, Mailloux (acquired via Bolduc)
Army IS NOT BUILDING VIA THE DRAFT, and the losses to MN are going to continue into the future.
Thanks Army.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
cite building through the first round.
but manage to omit Broberg, Holloway, Dvorsky, Lindstein, Stenberg, Carbonneau and just choose 3 out of 9
ok
but manage to omit Broberg, Holloway, Dvorsky, Lindstein, Stenberg, Carbonneau and just choose 3 out of 9
ok
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
I again dont understand this clowns entire mantra. Blues dont draft inside of #15 so the picks are not good, but Bolduc?seattleblue wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 13:10 pm cite building through the first round.
but manage to omit Broberg, Holloway, Dvorsky, Lindstein, Stenberg, Carbonneau and just choose 3 out of 9
ok
Schenn #5 '09
Fowler #12 '10
Bjudstad #19 '10
Thomas #20 '17'
Broberg #8 '19
Holloway #14 '20
Neighbours #26 '20
Mailloux #21 '21
Snuggerud #23 '22
39% of the line up is 1st rounders
Binnington, Parayko, Kyrou, Thomas, Torop, Hofer, Tucker, Neighbours, Kessel, Snuggerud,
43% of the roster are Blues draft picks
49% approx of NHL draftees make it to the NHL
90% approx of NHL first rounders make it to the NHL
70% approx of NHL second rounders "" ""
In '24:
Blues ranked 4th
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/wh ... the-draft/
So hmm
https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/456 ... -offseason
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
MINN scored 2 goals at the end of the 1st. Then MINN didn’t get another shot until around 6-7 minutes left in the 2nd period. That shot went in to make it 3-0. It came on the PP after another weak call.hotrivets wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 09:58 am It was disappointing that on opening night in front of their fans they could not mount an effort to overcome the first couple of goals. It's almost like players have to learn the same lessons at the beginning of each season. That makes me wonder how good the coaching was during the preseason.
But the next few games will give us a much better feel. Not crazy about the 3:00 start in Calgary but it's great to get the 6:30 start in Vancouver on Columbus Day.
It’s hard to dominate but not finish. Then have the other team play defense like they will make the playoffs if they don’t let in any goals after they scored 3 goals on 8 shots!!! Its was 24-8 in shots yet 3-0! Play that game 10 times and win 9 of them.
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Yea I think there is some truth to this. The scoreboard did not tell the whole store last night.stlblue06 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 14:36 pmMINN scored 2 goals at the end of the 1st. Then MINN didn’t get another shot until around 6-7 minutes left in the 2nd period. That shot went in to make it 3-0. It came on the PP after another weak call.hotrivets wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 09:58 am It was disappointing that on opening night in front of their fans they could not mount an effort to overcome the first couple of goals. It's almost like players have to learn the same lessons at the beginning of each season. That makes me wonder how good the coaching was during the preseason.
But the next few games will give us a much better feel. Not crazy about the 3:00 start in Calgary but it's great to get the 6:30 start in Vancouver on Columbus Day.
It’s hard to dominate but not finish. Then have the other team play defense like they will make the playoffs if they don’t let in any goals after they scored 3 goals on 8 shots!!! Its was 24-8 in shots yet 3-0! Play that game 10 times and win 9 of them.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 396
- Joined: 27 May 2024 14:31 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
I agree with everyone named Pierre McGuire. The score could just as easily been anything to cause a loss. Absolutely, totally one, single game.
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Not going to win many with 17 missed shots and most of the shots on goal in the midsection of the goalie. How many dangerous shots?stlblue06 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 14:36 pmMINN scored 2 goals at the end of the 1st. Then MINN didn’t get another shot until around 6-7 minutes left in the 2nd period. That shot went in to make it 3-0. It came on the PP after another weak call.hotrivets wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 09:58 am It was disappointing that on opening night in front of their fans they could not mount an effort to overcome the first couple of goals. It's almost like players have to learn the same lessons at the beginning of each season. That makes me wonder how good the coaching was during the preseason.
But the next few games will give us a much better feel. Not crazy about the 3:00 start in Calgary but it's great to get the 6:30 start in Vancouver on Columbus Day.
It’s hard to dominate but not finish. Then have the other team play defense like they will make the playoffs if they don’t let in any goals after they scored 3 goals on 8 shots!!! Its was 24-8 in shots yet 3-0! Play that game 10 times and win 9 of them.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Not sure where to start, but Bolduc is one hell of a player. He plays a 200-ft physical game and can pot 20-30 goals. He's exactly what every team is looking for in their top 6.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 11:39 amI never felt this move was strictly because they wanted to add a young dman but sure that’s part of it. I believe that LM was definitely a target based on teams that might have a young dman available…you can’t argue the fact that he is an AHL all star dman.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 11:05 amNeeding to find ways to sign good players is a good thing. It isn't a reason you take a huge gamble way prematurely. The Blues paid a premium for LM. Just because the Blues had a glut of wingers doesn't mean you rush to trade him or that it has to be for LM in particular. I hated it when it happened and, if it is even possible, I hate it more today after seeing him play.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 08:36 amNext season Bolduc will get an extension and could be a big one if he nets more than 25 this year. The Blues are going to extend both Holloway and Broberg the Blues wont be in cap trouble at that point they will use a prospect or two to fill some gaps but they simply didnt have space for Bolduc.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 07:07 amYea the whole team sucked, but you’re insane if you don’t understand why the guy that was the center of the biggest offseason move is going to be under a microscope. It wasn’t that it was all Mailloux’s fault, it was that he barely looked NHL caliber.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 06:52 am Good lord…it’s one game. Let’s see where they are at after 10 games. Some of you clowns already complaining about Mailloux….freaking comical. He was far from the biggest issue last night and it’s gonna take him some time.
Bolduc sealed his fate against Winnipeg in the playoffs, he was terrible. Blues saw something they didn’t like and decided they could move on from him. It’s going to take Mailloux a couple of years to get him playing like he did in the AHL.
We had chances, we just couldn’t finish. When Justin Faulk and Nathan Walker are your two best players …that’s gonna make for a long night.
Parayko was terrible, nothing from Thomas, Fowler and Buch not good. Not sure if Neighbours even realized this game counted because he brought nothing to the table last night.
Years? We traded Bolduc for a guy that might be serviceable years from now? You just don’t do that…that’s a guy you get for a 2nd or an ok-ish prospect.
The Blues feel like they already have their top 4 wingers set they like Snuggerud more than Bolduc so they dealt Bolduc. Whether or not the trade was good for the Blues as it relates to Mailloux will not be known soon which of course doesnt mesh with sports fan forum characteristics.
I still believe there is more to the story. I remember saying at least twice here during the Winnipeg series that Bolduc should have been benched for his play. Something happened that accelerated Bolduc’s exit…just my gut feeling.
I'd imagine he was (upset) after putting in the work his management asked of him in the offseason, spending time in the AHL earning his opportunity, and then being one of the core players that drove the team through its late season surge...only to see a lower draft pick player jerk management around for a year, choke in the college post season, and then be thrown a heroes welcome directly into the top scoring line for the postseason.
In our own excitement we're all going to ignore the impact last seasons Snuggerud treatment could have had on the other young committed players who are putting in their licks and bruises for this team.
Agreed on Neighbors and Buchnevich. Neither is engaging or impacting the game and its been a downward trajectory for both for well over a year.
Joseph, Bjugstad and Toropchenko just don't look like NHL caliber players, much less third line players.
Finally, as for Mailoux, he has a decent ceiling, but let's not get away from ourselves here...he has never been considered an "elite" player. He's been scouted as a very good offensive defenseman with very big gaps on defense and game IQ. He's also completely unproven, 22 years old, hasn't sniffed the NHL yet, and the team that drafted him traded for a player to make him irrelevant in their depth chart. Anyone proposing we give him time to develop is asking us to wait for a future Joel Edmundson; not Alex Pietrangelo.
Am I happy to have a Logan Mailoux in our organization? Absolutely. That said, Armstrong swung and missed on his first, second and possibly third defensive options in the offseason and potentially panic traded for Mailoux. Again, a good get at the right cost. It wasn't the right cost.
The team won't sink or swim based on the Mailoux/Bolduc trade, but I'm going to be real about my opinions of it. It seems pretty obvious to me that it was a bad trade now and it will be a bad trade in four years.
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
Well said WW
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 550
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
GMs who trade Bolduc for a potential Joel Edmundson won't be GM for very long. He may not be an All-Star Dman in the making, but he's suppose to be an offensive player with toughness and a developing defensive game, and that's what we have...just will take time and having him play with Tucker isn't a smart move by Monty.WilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 16:31 pmNot sure where to start, but Bolduc is one hell of a player. He plays a 200-ft physical game and can pot 20-30 goals. He's exactly what every team is looking for in their top 6.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 11:39 amI never felt this move was strictly because they wanted to add a young dman but sure that’s part of it. I believe that LM was definitely a target based on teams that might have a young dman available…you can’t argue the fact that he is an AHL all star dman.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 11:05 amNeeding to find ways to sign good players is a good thing. It isn't a reason you take a huge gamble way prematurely. The Blues paid a premium for LM. Just because the Blues had a glut of wingers doesn't mean you rush to trade him or that it has to be for LM in particular. I hated it when it happened and, if it is even possible, I hate it more today after seeing him play.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 08:36 amNext season Bolduc will get an extension and could be a big one if he nets more than 25 this year. The Blues are going to extend both Holloway and Broberg the Blues wont be in cap trouble at that point they will use a prospect or two to fill some gaps but they simply didnt have space for Bolduc.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 07:07 amYea the whole team sucked, but you’re insane if you don’t understand why the guy that was the center of the biggest offseason move is going to be under a microscope. It wasn’t that it was all Mailloux’s fault, it was that he barely looked NHL caliber.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 06:52 am Good lord…it’s one game. Let’s see where they are at after 10 games. Some of you clowns already complaining about Mailloux….freaking comical. He was far from the biggest issue last night and it’s gonna take him some time.
Bolduc sealed his fate against Winnipeg in the playoffs, he was terrible. Blues saw something they didn’t like and decided they could move on from him. It’s going to take Mailloux a couple of years to get him playing like he did in the AHL.
We had chances, we just couldn’t finish. When Justin Faulk and Nathan Walker are your two best players …that’s gonna make for a long night.
Parayko was terrible, nothing from Thomas, Fowler and Buch not good. Not sure if Neighbours even realized this game counted because he brought nothing to the table last night.
Years? We traded Bolduc for a guy that might be serviceable years from now? You just don’t do that…that’s a guy you get for a 2nd or an ok-ish prospect.
The Blues feel like they already have their top 4 wingers set they like Snuggerud more than Bolduc so they dealt Bolduc. Whether or not the trade was good for the Blues as it relates to Mailloux will not be known soon which of course doesnt mesh with sports fan forum characteristics.
I still believe there is more to the story. I remember saying at least twice here during the Winnipeg series that Bolduc should have been benched for his play. Something happened that accelerated Bolduc’s exit…just my gut feeling.
I'd imagine he was (upset) after putting in the work his management asked of him in the offseason, spending time in the AHL earning his opportunity, and then being one of the core players that drove the team through its late season surge...only to see a lower draft pick player jerk management around for a year, choke in the college post season, and then be thrown a heroes welcome directly into the top scoring line for the postseason.
In our own excitement we're all going to ignore the impact last seasons Snuggerud treatment could have had on the other young committed players who are putting in their licks and bruises for this team.
Agreed on Neighbors and Buchnevich. Neither is engaging or impacting the game and its been a downward trajectory for both for well over a year.
Joseph, Bjugstad and Toropchenko just don't look like NHL caliber players, much less third line players.
Finally, as for Mailoux, he has a decent ceiling, but let's not get away from ourselves here...he has never been considered an "elite" player. He's been scouted as a very good offensive defenseman with very big gaps on defense and game IQ. He's also completely unproven, 22 years old, hasn't sniffed the NHL yet, and the team that drafted him traded for a player to make him irrelevant in their depth chart. Anyone proposing we give him time to develop is asking us to wait for a future Joel Edmundson; not Alex Pietrangelo.
Am I happy to have a Logan Mailoux in our organization? Absolutely. That said, Armstrong swung and missed on his first, second and possibly third defensive options in the offseason and potentially panic traded for Mailoux. Again, a good get at the right cost. It wasn't the right cost.
The team won't sink or swim based on the Mailoux/Bolduc trade, but I'm going to be real about my opinions of it. It seems pretty obvious to me that it was a bad trade now and it will be a bad trade in four years.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2274
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
So many panties in tight twists after one game.
We dominated them more than they dominated us.
We made a few more mistakes and they got almost all of the bounces.
I would not want to have this many chicken littles on the bench for any team I would ever root for.
As Cher commanded in MOONSTRUCK, “ Snap out of it!”
We dominated them more than they dominated us.
We made a few more mistakes and they got almost all of the bounces.
I would not want to have this many chicken littles on the bench for any team I would ever root for.
As Cher commanded in MOONSTRUCK, “ Snap out of it!”
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 379
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: GDT Game 1 MIN @ BLUES
This is why they should've traded one of the 8 million dollar nonfactors instead (Kyrou or Buchnevich).Harry S Deals wrote: ↑10 Oct 2025 08:36 am Next season Bolduc will get an extension and could be a big one if he nets more than 25 this year. The Blues are going to extend both Holloway and Broberg the Blues wont be in cap trouble at that point they will use a prospect or two to fill some gaps but they simply didnt have space for Bolduc.
Then offer Bolduc a 3-4 year bridge deal for 4-5 million.
Too late now. (Armstrong just wanted to make his "hockey trade")