Crooks

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

imetsatchelpaige
Forum User
Posts: 1776
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by imetsatchelpaige »

renostl wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:54 pm
imetsatchelpaige wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:38 pm
Ace wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:33 pm Hit his 8th home run for Memphis tonight. He'll be 25 years old in July. What are they waiting for?
For him to stop striking out 40% of the time. At AAA.
Care to project that SO rate in the bigs?
I am high on this kid, but he needs seasoning.
34.7% but irrelevant, it's bad.

His strike zone command is not good.
That said I am not sure that even having a SO rate less
than 30% wins a job over Pages at this time and
that is who he'd replace.
Call me skeptical at the very least.
Thanks for the correction.
He has apparently improved over the last ten days.

To the poster correctly pointing out the upside of his offensive stats, it is important to note that this, too, is AAA.
It is no small step into the bigs.
No reason to rush him in a rebuilding year. Don't screw it up ala' Walker.
bfib
Forum User
Posts: 306
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:45 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by bfib »

Not sure how you rush a 25 year old

He’s going to age out of prospect status shortly

It’s very possible this is just what he is
renostl
Forum User
Posts: 4043
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by renostl »

imetsatchelpaige wrote: 22 Apr 2026 23:23 pm
renostl wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:54 pm
imetsatchelpaige wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:38 pm
Ace wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:33 pm Hit his 8th home run for Memphis tonight. He'll be 25 years old in July. What are they waiting for?
For him to stop striking out 40% of the time. At AAA.
Care to project that SO rate in the bigs?
I am high on this kid, but he needs seasoning.
34.7% but irrelevant, it's bad.

His strike zone command is not good.
That said I am not sure that even having a SO rate less
than 30% wins a job over Pages at this time and
that is who he'd replace.
Call me skeptical at the very least.
Thanks for the correction.
He has apparently improved over the last ten days.

To the poster correctly pointing out the upside of his offensive stats, it is important to note that this, too, is AAA.
It is no small step into the bigs.
No reason to rush him in a rebuilding year. Don't screw it up ala' Walker.
The difference was also called irrelevant.
Irrelevant because neither number is good.

He does have some really good hit rates.

Crooks and Walker have nothing to do with each other, imo.

Most importantly though, there isn’t a job opening. If there was we would probably see him rather quickly.
StlMike1969
Forum User
Posts: 344
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Crooks

Post by StlMike1969 »

I would be curious to know also on his SO rate what % is swing and miss vs looking. Either way I am in the club that in a rebuilding year when they are letting a guy like Scott get important at bats with the whole he will come around attitude it makes no sense to keep a guy like Crooks in Memphis. Trade Pages and let Crooks have the rest of the year to adjust as the starter. The team is not expected to win this year anyway and the added power Crooks brings is needed not to mention the defense. I am not saying that Crooks is a Molina but even Yadier had 3 subpar hitting seasons before he took off to be a more complete hitter. If Crooks can hit .270 25 HR's is anyone really going to care if he strikes out 140 times? Pages will never do those numbers nor Scott for that matter. Just sayin.
2ninr
Forum User
Posts: 1421
Joined: 24 May 2024 15:04 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by 2ninr »

bfib wrote: 22 Apr 2026 23:46 pm Not sure how you rush a 25 year old

He’s going to age out of prospect status shortly

It’s very possible this is just what he is
Is it possible they would rather trade him before he is exposed to a lengthy ml runway?🤔
TraveledLessRoad
Forum User
Posts: 491
Joined: 10 Jul 2024 14:36 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by TraveledLessRoad »

Cal Raleigh struck out at a 35% clip in his first MLB Season...2021. Just saying...
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 16117
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by rockondlouie »

imetsatchelpaige wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:38 pm
Ace wrote: 22 Apr 2026 19:33 pm Hit his 8th home run for Memphis tonight. He'll be 25 years old in July. What are they waiting for?
For him to stop striking out 40% of the time. At AAA.
Care to project that SO rate in the bigs?
I am high on this kid, but he needs seasoning.
BINGO satch!

Crooks is a future trade piece, either midseason or sometime in 2027 or as soon as Bernal is ready (and then of course, R.R. if he stays behind the plate).

Tearing up AAA, even w/the KO's, still keeps his trade value high.

Bring him up before he develops a better contact rate and he flops (17 KO's in his 46 2025 PA's in MLB), the trade value plummets.

Bloom's walking a fine line w/him.

I loathe Pages playing but also don't want to see Crooks up until he's ready.

Didn't we learn anything from the Mo debacle? :?
MIDMOBIRDTWO
Forum User
Posts: 4886
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by MIDMOBIRDTWO »

Hoosier59 wrote: 22 Apr 2026 20:53 pm Crooks has an OB% over .400, and an OPS over 1.0. He has always driven in runs, but you guys keep drooling over Pages the great!
Oli is the one drooling over PP. His bestest bud.
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 6021
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by Melville »

TraveledLessRoad wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:23 am Cal Raleigh struck out at a 35% clip in his first MLB Season...2021. Just saying...
Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
Defensively, he is nowhere close to Crooks.
Many folks overlook that there is a very different value propositions based on position - and nowhere is that more true than at catcher.
Crooks is very good defensively - better than any of the 3 catchers in STL.
Crooks has a good arm.
He has rare power for the position.
The strikeouts, while high, are simply not a concern.
This is a year in which STL wants to learn - while also competing (at least, the is the public posture).
There is zero logical reason for Crooks to be in AAA when it is highly likely that he would be the best catcher on the roster if he was in STL - and is almost certainly their best option over the following couple of years as well.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7669
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by ramfandan »

For those very concerned about high strikeouts let me present this tad food for thought.

Would you trade a high number of strikeouts for 56 homeruns ?

Well, Kyle Schwarber had 56 home runs in 2025 and had the 197 strikeouts 3rd highest total in MLB.
Despite the enormous number of whiffs, he was highly coveted by several teams in free agency.

Not saying Crooks would hit 56 but the point is you can be productive with quite a few whiffs.
Catcher is a premium defensive position ( one of 3 with SS and CF)
Having a good defender like Crooks along with plus power is tough to find.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1695
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Melville wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:56 am
TraveledLessRoad wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:23 am Cal Raleigh struck out at a 35% clip in his first MLB Season...2021. Just saying...
Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
Defensively, he is nowhere close to Crooks.
Many folks overlook that there is a very different value propositions based on position - and nowhere is that more true than at catcher.
Crooks is very good defensively - better than any of the 3 catchers in STL.
Crooks has a good arm.
He has rare power for the position.
The strikeouts, while high, are simply not a concern.
This is a year in which STL wants to learn - while also competing (at least, the is the public posture).
There is zero logical reason for Crooks to be in AAA when it is highly likely that he would be the best catcher on the roster if he was in STL - and is almost certainly their best option over the following couple of years as well.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
^this

Strikeouts be damned. But, also let's be clear. The K% that people are dramatizing is based on very low sample sizes. Last year in MLB he K'd 37% of the time, IN 46 PAs!! This year in Memphis, he has K'd 35% of the time, IN 80 PAs! Note the small sample sizes!

Historically, he has K'd 24% of the time in MiLB, 18% of the time in College, and 18% of the time in Fall/Summer ball. Those are real sample sizes.

To Mels point, if we have a +glove and +arm catcher defensively with 20+ HR power from the left side that hits .270+ and gets on base at a .350+ clip, do we really care if he strikeouts 25% of the time? Bat that guy 7th all day long and play ball!

Further, get rid of Pages and probably Pozo too. Bring up Crooks and Torres. Crooks catches against RHP and Herrera catches against LHP. Torres plays LF and is the emergency catcher.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 7669
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by ramfandan »

For those very concerned about high strikeouts let me present this tad food for thought.

Would you trade a high number of strikeouts for 56 homeruns ?

Well, Kyle Schwarber had 56 home runs in 2025 and had the 197 strikeouts 3rd highest total in MLB.
Despite the enormous number of whiffs, he was highly coveted by several teams in free agency.

Not saying Crooks would hit 56 but the point is you can be productive with quite a few whiffs.
Catcher is a premium defensive position ( one of 3 with SS and CF)
Having a good defender like Crooks along with plus power is tough to find.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 16117
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by rockondlouie »

Melville wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:56 am Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
He also play's half his games at Coors Field in Denver. :wink:
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 8993
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

rockondlouie wrote: 23 Apr 2026 10:59 am
Melville wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:56 am Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
He also play's half his games at Coors Field in Denver. :wink:
He has 24 home runs in his career on the road in 475 at bats and 27 at home in 502 at bats. His average and OBP on the road is bad though but pages can’t hit for average or get on base so if crooks can hit about .200 like pages and provide some pop while playing better defense which wouldn’t be hard it would be a big improvement you could then platoon crooks and Herrera and get rid of pozo for a more useful bench player. If this is a runway for young players it should be crooks not pages pages is not the future
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1695
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 23 Apr 2026 11:22 am
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Apr 2026 10:59 am
Melville wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:56 am Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
He also play's half his games at Coors Field in Denver. :wink:
He has 24 home runs in his career on the road in 475 at bats and 27 at home in 502 at bats. His average and OBP on the road is bad though but pages can’t hit for average or get on base so if crooks can hit about .200 like pages and provide some pop while playing better defense which wouldn’t be hard it would be a big improvement you could then platoon crooks and Herrera and get rid of pozo for a more useful bench player
As I said above...

"Further, get rid of Pages and probably Pozo too. Bring up Crooks and Torres. Crooks catches against RHP and Herrera catches against LHP. Torres plays LF and is the emergency catcher."
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 8993
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Crooks

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Basil Shabazz wrote: 23 Apr 2026 11:24 am
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 23 Apr 2026 11:22 am
rockondlouie wrote: 23 Apr 2026 10:59 am
Melville wrote: 23 Apr 2026 08:56 am Another example.
Hunter Goodman is striking out at a 37% clip this season.
He also has 12 XBH's, a .264 BA, and a .340 OBP.
He has a 28% K rate across 4 MLB seasons - but he also has a 30+ HR season, a 90+ RBI season, an ASG selection, and a Silver Slugger award.
He also play's half his games at Coors Field in Denver. :wink:
He has 24 home runs in his career on the road in 475 at bats and 27 at home in 502 at bats. His average and OBP on the road is bad though but pages can’t hit for average or get on base so if crooks can hit about .200 like pages and provide some pop while playing better defense which wouldn’t be hard it would be a big improvement you could then platoon crooks and Herrera and get rid of pozo for a more useful bench player
As I said above...

"Further, get rid of Pages and probably Pozo too. Bring up Crooks and Torres. Crooks catches against RHP and Herrera catches against LHP. Torres plays LF and is the emergency catcher."
I like it