Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:05 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:52 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:49 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:47 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:41 pm I’m not convinced we’re that far away.
Over the past 130+ games the Flames have more points.

I’m sure a couple of their fans are saying the same
And the Flames haven’t made the playoffs since the 2021/22 season. The Blues got in last year. It’s a meaningless stat
The blues won a tiebreaker with the flames last year. What an accomplishment.

Over the past 130+ games the mighty flames have more points
Correct, it was an accomplishment to qualify for the playoffs. Calgary didn’t, and likely won’t for the 4th straight year.

Maybe Calgary would have qualified had they won just 1 of the games against the 2024/25 Blues, but they didn’t. Calgary got swept while being out-scored 10-5.

They can’t even blame the Blues being on the heater, because the Flames didn’t play St Louis after January 16, when the Blues were just 22-20-4.

So, whine about the tiebreaker, but the Flames got their skates kicked out from under themselves by going 0-3-0 and being outscore by a factor of 2 against the Blues
And the blues had the biggest collapse in their history

That doesn’t change that the flames have more points over the past 130+ games
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 1888
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

Another 10 minutes of my life I’ll never get back after reading this thread. Not taking the bait anymore….foe once again sadly becomes my friend again.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 13177
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by Absolut »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:29 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:26 pm Why do you move him?
So you didn’t watch? Because they talk about the reasons lol
I guess nobody could disagree. “Lol”.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:21 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:29 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:26 pm Why do you move him?
So you didn’t watch? Because they talk about the reasons lol
I guess nobody could disagree. “Lol”.
Which reasons given did you disagree with?
d--train
Forum User
Posts: 33
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:58 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by d--train »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 21 Jan 2026 17:52 pm How will history remember the Robert Thomas era?
If we're being honest, what has he done?

He really doesn't elevate those around him. He's not a battler in the heat of things.

He's just an average 1c or 2c.

He's fine. I'm ok keeping him or moving him.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 13177
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by Absolut »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:23 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:21 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:29 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:26 pm Why do you move him?
So you didn’t watch? Because they talk about the reasons lol
I guess nobody could disagree. “Lol”.
Which reasons given did you disagree with?
Well, after listening to the idiot explain why he thought a quarter cup of chili flakes on a piece of fish was logical, let alone entertaining, they then get to he hasn’t figured it out. Tells you what you are dealing with. You aren’t going to get fair return on Thomas, I’m not trading him. When was the last time stl had a center that was plus point per game?

What part blew your socks off?
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:35 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:23 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:21 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:29 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:26 pm Why do you move him?
So you didn’t watch? Because they talk about the reasons lol
I guess nobody could disagree. “Lol”.
Which reasons given did you disagree with?
Well, after listening to the idiot explain why he thought a quarter cup of chili flakes on a piece of fish was logical, let alone entertaining, they then get to he hasn’t figured it out. Tells you what you are dealing with. You aren’t going to get fair return on Thomas, I’m not trading him. When was the last time stl had a center that was plus point per game?

What part blew your socks off?
Blowing my socks off? Armstrong said he’s on the table. Berube said he doesn’t care and questioned his heart (publicly). When was the last time stl said that about a C publicly.

You can act defensive but at the end of the day both sides are unhappy … that’s what happens … and is happening.

Dreger talking about it
Rutherford talking about it

Why wouldn’t they? It’s real
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 542
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by BleedingBleu »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:09 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:05 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:52 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:49 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:47 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:41 pm I’m not convinced we’re that far away.
Over the past 130+ games the Flames have more points.

I’m sure a couple of their fans are saying the same
And the Flames haven’t made the playoffs since the 2021/22 season. The Blues got in last year. It’s a meaningless stat
The blues won a tiebreaker with the flames last year. What an accomplishment.

Over the past 130+ games the mighty flames have more points
Correct, it was an accomplishment to qualify for the playoffs. Calgary didn’t, and likely won’t for the 4th straight year.

Maybe Calgary would have qualified had they won just 1 of the games against the 2024/25 Blues, but they didn’t. Calgary got swept while being out-scored 10-5.

They can’t even blame the Blues being on the heater, because the Flames didn’t play St Louis after January 16, when the Blues were just 22-20-4.

So, whine about the tiebreaker, but the Flames got their skates kicked out from under themselves by going 0-3-0 and being outscore by a factor of 2 against the Blues
And the blues had the biggest collapse in their history

That doesn’t change that the flames have more points over the past 130+ games
Yep, the Blues had the President’s Trophy Winner on the ropes with a mere second left and couldn’t close the Jets out on the Road. However, Calgary couldn’t even get into the ring, let alone go 7 rounds. They had to watch the playoffs on the couch.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 13177
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by Absolut »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:40 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:35 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:23 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:21 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:29 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 18:26 pm Why do you move him?
So you didn’t watch? Because they talk about the reasons lol
I guess nobody could disagree. “Lol”.
Which reasons given did you disagree with?
Well, after listening to the idiot explain why he thought a quarter cup of chili flakes on a piece of fish was logical, let alone entertaining, they then get to he hasn’t figured it out. Tells you what you are dealing with. You aren’t going to get fair return on Thomas, I’m not trading him. When was the last time stl had a center that was plus point per game?

What part blew your socks off?
Blowing my socks off? Armstrong said he’s on the table. Berube said he doesn’t care and questioned his heart (publicly). When was the last time stl said that about a C publicly.

You can act defensive but at the end of the day both sides are unhappy … that’s what happens … and is happening.

Dreger talking about it
Rutherford talking about it

Why wouldn’t they? It’s real
defensive? I’m not trading him unless they get a crazy offer, and I don’t see that happening.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:41 pm Yep, the Blues had the President’s Trophy Winner on the ropes with a mere second left and couldn’t close the Jets out on the Road. However, Calgary couldn’t even get into the ring, let alone go 7 rounds. They had to watch the playoffs on the couch.
That doesn’t change that the flames have more points over the past 130+ games
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:42 pm I don’t see that happening.
I agree. But the adds to the frustration for people. They’ve been trying to trade Kyrou for years.

The Blues are in a hot mess…and it’s self-imposed.

Nobody is throwing a drowning Armstrong a life preserver
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 542
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by BleedingBleu »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:46 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:41 pm Yep, the Blues had the President’s Trophy Winner on the ropes with a mere second left and couldn’t close the Jets out on the Road. However, Calgary couldn’t even get into the ring, let alone go 7 rounds. They had to watch the playoffs on the couch.
That doesn’t change that the flames have more points over the past 130+ games
Maybe that’s worthy of a banner in Nashville, but arbitrary stat doesn’t mean anything.

I’m sure Calgary fans would like to get past the Second Round one day, but that hasn’t happened since the 2003/04 season… when Robert Thomas was 4.

Image
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Jan 2026 20:18 pm Maybe that’s worthy of a banner in Nashville, but arbitrary stat doesn’t mean anything.
Arbitrary how?

Is one of the worst collapses in NHL history worthy of a banner?
Bacchk29
Forum User
Posts: 1325
Joined: 29 Apr 2019 07:24 am

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by Bacchk29 »

theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:49 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:42 pm I don’t see that happening.
I agree. But the adds to the frustration for people. They’ve been trying to trade Kyrou for years.

The Blues are in a hot mess…and it’s self-imposed.

Nobody is throwing a drowning Armstrong a life preserver
Faulk is the only player we’ll get any value out of. It’s a pretty sad situation.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by theograce »

Bacchk29 wrote: 21 Jan 2026 20:24 pm
theograce wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:49 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:42 pm I don’t see that happening.
I agree. But the adds to the frustration for people. They’ve been trying to trade Kyrou for years.

The Blues are in a hot mess…and it’s self-imposed.

Nobody is throwing a drowning Armstrong a life preserver
Faulk is the only player we’ll get any value out of. It’s a pretty sad situation.
I dunno. I mean a contender isn’t getting Faulk for big minutes. The league knows who he is. There wasn’t much interest league-wide when he was available previously.

Time will tell
Jeff Goldblum
Forum User
Posts: 767
Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm

Re: Rutherford - “Thomas might be the only thing Armstrong can get anything for at this point”

Post by Jeff Goldblum »

TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: 21 Jan 2026 19:21 pm Another 10 minutes of my life I’ll never get back after reading this thread. Not taking the bait anymore….foe once again sadly becomes my friend again.
It's the only way. The mods wont do their job.
Post Reply