Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Midrange Jay
Forum User
Posts: 177
Joined: 10 Jun 2024 01:56 am

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by Midrange Jay »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

RamFan08NY wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:27 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 13:58 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:52 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
My thoughts exactly! The Cardinals shouldn’t have to pay down much at all if any to get a deal done with Willson, and with a good return. Don’t get me wrong, if the Cardinals were trying to compete, he’d be worth keeping, but they aren’t. So, he is a logical player to deal. Plus I feel that he has sorta worn out his welcome with the Manager and Ownership. I would also argue how much of a team leader he is! Sure he plays with a lot of passion and fire, but sometimes that is overdone, and not necessarily good for the team. Example, leaning in or just standing there to get hit by a pitch, and then calling out your teammates for retaliating! Just dumb!
For the right return, I’d trade him in a second!
That plus all the drama when he whines about his teammates not retaliating when he deliberately gets hit by a pitch on the elbow pad. Bring in a new face or two.
Wouldn't it be nice if the team had 3 or 4 other guys who had the same fire and passion to win that WC has?

Bob Gibson showed that passion and hes a competitor. Contreras shows it and hes a whiner?
I saw Bob Gibson play many times. Never saw him pull that nonsense. He was all business.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
Midrange Jay
Forum User
Posts: 177
Joined: 10 Jun 2024 01:56 am

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by Midrange Jay »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
AZ_Cardsfan
Forum User
Posts: 1023
Joined: 26 May 2024 00:49 am

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by AZ_Cardsfan »

Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 07:26 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
I think Herrera is still trying to be a catcher but the team doesn't view him as suitable behind the plate. His bat plays anywhere so he has a job. Plus if you look the deepest part of the Cards farm system is catchers.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 07:26 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/

By what metric was Contreras better in 2025? HBP?
Midrange Jay
Forum User
Posts: 177
Joined: 10 Jun 2024 01:56 am

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by Midrange Jay »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 22 Nov 2025 09:20 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 07:26 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/

By what metric was Contreras better in 2025? HBP?
Defense, playing a full season and consistently producing. Herrera has been injured every season. Butleson played 75 innings at 1B.

Also, that page opens to Contreras being #1 in HR’s.

All 3 players are worth keeping.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 13458
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by rockondlouie »

I don't think it's upside down at all, in fact he's still a bargain (IMO) as a 1st baseman.

If he's dealt, no way the Cardinals pickup any of his salary like they will w/NADO & S. Gray.

(But I don't think he's going anywhere)
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 09:43 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 22 Nov 2025 09:20 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 07:26 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/

By what metric was Contreras better in 2025? HBP?
Defense, playing a full season and consistently producing. Herrera has been injured every season. Butleson played 75 innings at 1B.

Also, that page opens to Contreras being #1 in HR’s.

All 3 players are worth keeping.
58 more strikeouts than Hererra for 1 home run. 62 more strikeouts than Burleson for 2 home runs. Outfield gets better with Burleson at 1B and Contreras was 1 error short of being tied for most errors. We aren't losing defense. Move him for a ballplayer.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4354
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ecleme22 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 22 Nov 2025 14:32 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 09:43 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 22 Nov 2025 09:20 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 22 Nov 2025 07:26 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 19:54 pm
Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Nov 2025 16:47 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
Burleson doesn’t have a defensive position, and Herrera is yet to play a healthy season. The trade return would have to be pretty good to justify trading him.
Burleson 1B. Hererra DH.
I like both players, but that is a hope, not a plan based on demonstrated production. Also, isn’t Herrera supposed to be our Catcher next year?
https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/stats/

By what metric was Contreras better in 2025? HBP?
Defense, playing a full season and consistently producing. Herrera has been injured every season. Butleson played 75 innings at 1B.

Also, that page opens to Contreras being #1 in HR’s.

All 3 players are worth keeping.
58 more strikeouts than Hererra for 1 home run. 62 more strikeouts than Burleson for 2 home runs. Outfield gets better with Burleson at 1B and Contreras was 1 error short of being tied for most errors. We aren't losing defense. Move him for a ballplayer.
Players arent judged solely on strikeouts and errors.

Also, WC was one of the better 1b in the NL.
dugoutrex
Forum User
Posts: 1102
Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by dugoutrex »

no it isn't but I hope we hang onto our best player!
mattmitchl44
Forum User
Posts: 2636
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by mattmitchl44 »

I would say it is mostly spot on at this point. Due $36 million, need to get 4 to 4.5 fWAR for that. Has been a steady 2.7 to 2.8 fWAR the last three years.

Unless you think his offensive production is going to slide really hard due to accumulated wear-and-tear at age 34/35, he should be a solid bet to be worth that $36 million.

Trade him if you can get prospect value back for him.
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2945
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by OldRed »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
I agree. also, if Contreras could have caught it would have made a difference.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

OldRed wrote: 23 Nov 2025 08:05 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
I agree. also, if Contreras could have caught it would have made a difference.
He got that contract because he was a catcher - or so we thought.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4354
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ecleme22 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 23 Nov 2025 08:10 am
OldRed wrote: 23 Nov 2025 08:05 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
I agree. also, if Contreras could have caught it would have made a difference.
He got that contract because he was a catcher - or so we thought.
A big reason WC was moved off catcher was to give IH an opportunity. WC was a total team player. It’s not his fault that IH wasn’t a good catcher and had injuries.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1540
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is The Contreras Contract Really Underwater?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

ecleme22 wrote: 23 Nov 2025 09:33 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 23 Nov 2025 08:10 am
OldRed wrote: 23 Nov 2025 08:05 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 21 Nov 2025 11:42 am
Midrange Jay wrote: 20 Nov 2025 18:57 pm He is our best hitter. There is no free agent 1B that could replace his production at a cheaper price. The team only has $75 million of contracts committed, half of which come off the books next year with Gray. Unless there is a major league ready prospect coming back, it would be squandering one of our few assets.
He isn't our best hitter. Hererra and Burleson hit for much higher average, same power and higher ops while striking out far fewer times. Move Contreras for a good prospect or a starting pitcher.
I agree. also, if Contreras could have caught it would have made a difference.
He got that contract because he was a catcher - or so we thought.
A big reason WC was moved off catcher was to give IH an opportunity. WC was a total team player. It’s not his fault that IH wasn’t a good catcher and had injuries.
What's you theory on why Contreras remained at 1B when it became obvious Hererra couldn't catch at the MLB level?
Post Reply