Goalie Interference

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1022
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by BalotelliMassive »

Harold_Melvin wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:15 pm Goalie interference calls are the worst because no one seems to know what the rules are. Might as well just flip a coin and move on.
The Hawks were hosed against Vancouver too...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjqWoJh2xfw
Old_Goat
Forum User
Posts: 618
Joined: 28 Dec 2024 08:46 am

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Old_Goat »

DawgDad wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:30 pm The contact looked like goaltender interference, it was challenged, and on review it was deemed interference. It was potentially a two-point call, they exercised due diligence.

It was a good challenge, right call. Blues fans were very pleased.
Exactly, it was a good call. He smacked the goalie with his stick and bumped into him and the Canucks player's skate in the crease prevented Binnington to get his own right skate back, throwing Binnington off balance just as the shot was coming in from the point. Yes, that puck hit Fowler first but the interference prevented Binnington from being able to be in proper position to block the quick swat of the puck after it hit Fowler.
succinct712
Forum User
Posts: 213
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by succinct712 »

Old_Goat wrote: 31 Oct 2025 09:10 am
DawgDad wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:30 pm The contact looked like goaltender interference, it was challenged, and on review it was deemed interference. It was potentially a two-point call, they exercised due diligence.

It was a good challenge, right call. Blues fans were very pleased.
Exactly, it was a good call. He smacked the goalie with his stick and bumped into him and the Canucks player's skate in the crease prevented Binnington to get his own right skate back, throwing Binnington off balance just as the shot was coming in from the point. Yes, that puck hit Fowler first but the interference prevented Binnington from being able to be in proper position to block the quick swat of the puck after it hit Fowler.
I agree, way too much contact on the goalie there IMO.
MrPostman01
Forum User
Posts: 611
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by MrPostman01 »

Old_Goat wrote: 31 Oct 2025 09:10 am
DawgDad wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:30 pm The contact looked like goaltender interference, it was challenged, and on review it was deemed interference. It was potentially a two-point call, they exercised due diligence.

It was a good challenge, right call. Blues fans were very pleased.
Exactly, it was a good call. He smacked the goalie with his stick and bumped into him and the Canucks player's skate in the crease prevented Binnington to get his own right skate back, throwing Binnington off balance just as the shot was coming in from the point. Yes, that puck hit Fowler first but the interference prevented Binnington from being able to be in proper position to block the quick swat of the puck after it hit Fowler.
Thanks for clearing that up. It did seem wrong to give the opposing forward "squatter's rights" in front of our goal.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1931
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by seattleblue »

I thought this was a clearly correct overturn - you cannot whack a goalie's chest and arm with your stick while you're in the blue paint and he's trying to make a save. this was an easy one
Post Reply