Goalie Interference

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Hooking
Forum User
Posts: 788
Joined: 13 Dec 2023 09:39 am

Goalie Interference

Post by Hooking »

Game never should have gone to OT/SO.
I am happy the Blues at least got a point I guess but this league is wack sometimes.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 5056
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by theograce »

I thought it should have counted. Pretty tight enforcement there
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1240
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by bluetunehead »

Not the most blatant, but he was in the crease fully of his own accord and physically interfering with Binnington. That’s pretty textbook even if he didn’t do much.
The Average Gatsby
Forum User
Posts: 109
Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by The Average Gatsby »

I guess it was goalie interference but I wouldn’t have thought anything of it without the endless replays.
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 1712
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by MiamiLaw »

I’ve seen worse allowed to stand
stlblue06
Forum User
Posts: 487
Joined: 24 May 2024 13:44 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by stlblue06 »

I’m not sure what you guys were watching but that was clear interference. MacK stick checked Binner right before the shot came. The contact with his skate was also there but look at what he did to Binner’s stick. Can’t do that and really stupid
Harold_Melvin
Forum User
Posts: 799
Joined: 02 Dec 2023 20:49 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Harold_Melvin »

Goalie interference calls are the worst because no one seems to know what the rules are. Might as well just flip a coin and move on.
Harold_Melvin
Forum User
Posts: 799
Joined: 02 Dec 2023 20:49 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Harold_Melvin »

stlblue06 wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:06 pm I’m not sure what you guys were watching but that was clear interference. MacK stick checked Binner right before the shot came. The contact with his skate was also there but look at what he did to Binner’s stick. Can’t do that and really stupid
If it were clearly interference then the review wouldn't have taken 5 minutes. I've watched a lot of hockey and overturning that goal was bonkers IMO. Incidental contact happens even if it's on purpose.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7473
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by DawgDad »

The contact looked like goaltender interference, it was challenged, and on review it was deemed interference. It was potentially a two-point call, they exercised due diligence.

It was a good challenge, right call. Blues fans were very pleased.
stlblue06
Forum User
Posts: 487
Joined: 24 May 2024 13:44 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by stlblue06 »

Harold_Melvin wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:19 pm
stlblue06 wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:06 pm I’m not sure what you guys were watching but that was clear interference. MacK stick checked Binner right before the shot came. The contact with his skate was also there but look at what he did to Binner’s stick. Can’t do that and really stupid
If it were clearly interference then the review wouldn't have taken 5 minutes. I've watched a lot of hockey and overturning that goal was bonkers IMO. Incidental contact happens even if it's on purpose.
I’ve never seen a player slash a goalie’s stick right before a shot and it not be interference.

I assume it took longer than it should because the refs were closely looking at the skate contact over and over again before they realized the stick check that happened after that. Easy call
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 1561
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by skilles »

MiamiLaw wrote: 30 Oct 2025 22:42 pm I’ve seen worse allowed to stand
Have you though? I men the guys is controlling his stick/blocker and the puck goes stick/blocker side.
Harold_Melvin
Forum User
Posts: 799
Joined: 02 Dec 2023 20:49 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Harold_Melvin »

stlblue06 wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:36 pm
Harold_Melvin wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:19 pm
stlblue06 wrote: 30 Oct 2025 23:06 pm I’m not sure what you guys were watching but that was clear interference. MacK stick checked Binner right before the shot came. The contact with his skate was also there but look at what he did to Binner’s stick. Can’t do that and really stupid
If it were clearly interference then the review wouldn't have taken 5 minutes. I've watched a lot of hockey and overturning that goal was bonkers IMO. Incidental contact happens even if it's on purpose.
I’ve never seen a player slash a goalie’s stick right before a shot and it not be interference.

I assume it took longer than it should because the refs were closely looking at the skate contact over and over again before they realized the stick check that happened after that. Easy call
If the goalie's stick was slashed "right before" the shot then it wouldn't have taken so long to review. It took a long time to review because no one knows the rules...not even the refs.
stlblue06
Forum User
Posts: 487
Joined: 24 May 2024 13:44 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by stlblue06 »

Can’t argue with stupid
Tony Palazzolo
Forum User
Posts: 212
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:13 am

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Tony Palazzolo »

I thought it was borderline initially, but I was looking at the first action when he hits Binnington's skate. Monty said they tried to buy time to look at it and went for it when it appears he hooks Binnington's stick. They felt 80% confident they would get it.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 12588
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by Absolut »

Pretty clear to me.


(1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or
(2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. ...
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2594
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Goalie Interference

Post by TheJackBurton »

Hooking wrote: 30 Oct 2025 22:30 pm Game never should have gone to OT/SO.
I am happy the Blues at least got a point I guess but this league is wack sometimes.
Naaa that one was pretty easy. Mac was holding down Binningtons stick.

He was very obviously, even if unintentionally, interfering with Binningtons ability to make the save.
Post Reply