Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Ronnie Dobbs
Forum User
Posts: 1204
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by Ronnie Dobbs »

I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13154
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by An Old Friend »

Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 17 Jul 2025 17:50 pm I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
Yesss. It seemed clear that they were drafting with an eye on carrying traits / elite tools.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 733
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Mozeliak drafted a recent Cy Young winner and the ace of a NL championship team.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 1064
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by CCard »

An Old Friend wrote: 17 Jul 2025 17:06 pm
CCard wrote: 17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm 1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
I don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?

On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
Did trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13154
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by An Old Friend »

CCard wrote: 17 Jul 2025 23:16 pm
An Old Friend wrote: 17 Jul 2025 17:06 pm
CCard wrote: 17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm 1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
I don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?

On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
Did trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.
Are you drunk, high, or both?

No, trading Betts at a discount in order to offload David Price’s contract did not make Boston better. No one would suggest that it did or was intended to. And trading Betts didn’t cost Bloom his job. It was the first thing he was tasked with doing.

Secondly, I said owners aren’t running the draft.

I never said or insinuated that they should be or are far away from baseball operations.
Jobafish
Forum User
Posts: 30
Joined: 29 Mar 2025 16:13 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by Jobafish »

jbrach wrote: 15 Jul 2025 14:08 pm why was whitey herzog not in his old job when the cards hired him?
That’s pretty much what I thought when I read his post lol
woofy25
Forum User
Posts: 1354
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by woofy25 »

So, is it safe to say Randy Flores has nothing to do with who gets drafted? It has been Mo and now Bloom this whole time? Maybe having the fifth pick was the real differentiator.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 7934
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by scoutyjones2 »

Jatalk wrote: 15 Jul 2025 10:48 am Drafting at #5 helps
LoL
No kidding.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 1064
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by CCard »

jbrach wrote: 15 Jul 2025 14:08 pm why was whitey herzog not in his old job when the cards hired him?
Because no matter how many times he took KC to the playoffs they just couldn't get past the Yankees. He came to Busch and Augustus game him a dual job as GM and Manager. The rest is history.
HighHeat23
Forum User
Posts: 56
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:48 pm

Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom

Post by HighHeat23 »

Goldfan wrote: 17 Jul 2025 17:32 pm They needed new people in org to know to draft fireball pitchers??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I really don’t know what to say anymore….
If only that were true...
Post Reply