Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1204
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13155
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Yesss. It seemed clear that they were drafting with an eye on carrying traits / elite tools.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:50 pm I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Mozeliak drafted a recent Cy Young winner and the ace of a NL championship team.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Did trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.An Old Friend wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:06 pmI don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm 1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13155
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Are you drunk, high, or both?CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 23:16 pmDid trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.An Old Friend wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:06 pmI don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm 1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
No, trading Betts at a discount in order to offload David Price’s contract did not make Boston better. No one would suggest that it did or was intended to. And trading Betts didn’t cost Bloom his job. It was the first thing he was tasked with doing.
Secondly, I said owners aren’t running the draft.
I never said or insinuated that they should be or are far away from baseball operations.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
So, is it safe to say Randy Flores has nothing to do with who gets drafted? It has been Mo and now Bloom this whole time? Maybe having the fifth pick was the real differentiator.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 7934
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 56
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:48 pm