STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1513123
No doubt this is Shady...keep spreading the word!
Buy why isn't anybody addressing that Nado has been screwing over the Cards over every trade offer? Even to good teams? I hate him. but you're still getting the money, so there axxholeMonsieur De Treville wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:26 am I'm a big Nolan Arenado fan. I hope he goes into the HOF someday. But he has no place being on this team.
Make no mistake...Cards are rebuilding and any rebuild starts with youth. Winn, Scott, Herrera, Walker, Gorman, even Burly. With JW coming back sooner rather than later, this team has to give regular playing time to both Walker & Gorman....and that is so much easier with the 34 year-old and obviously declining Nado gone.
Why not talk to the Cubs? They are in desperate need of a third baseman and currently have nothing. Nado is still great defensively and may just see a resurgence playing in the friendly confines of Wrigley. And realistically, we're not catching the Cubbies this season anyway, so why not?
I don't know...it'll never happen...but it would behoove Mo & the Cardinals to do whatever is necessary to move Nado. Yes, he has a no trade...but...I'm sure he'd like a legit shot at a ring. Not happening here I don't think.
The youth aren’t better. Weve seen that with guys like vilade in the lineup. And We aren’t getting top 10 prospects in return.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:26 am I'm a big Nolan Arenado fan. I hope he goes into the HOF someday. But he has no place being on this team.
Make no mistake...Cards are rebuilding and any rebuild starts with youth. Winn, Scott, Herrera, Walker, Gorman, even Burly. With JW coming back sooner rather than later, this team has to give regular playing time to both Walker & Gorman....and that is so much easier with the 34 year-old and obviously declining Nado gone.
Why not talk to the Cubs? They are in desperate need of a third baseman and currently have nothing. Nado is still great defensively and may just see a resurgence playing in the friendly confines of Wrigley. And realistically, we're not catching the Cubbies this season anyway, so why not?
I don't know...it'll never happen...but it would behoove Mo & the Cardinals to do whatever is necessary to move Nado. Yes, he has a no trade...but...I'm sure he'd like a legit shot at a ring. Not happening here I don't think.
You are a demented idiot. Evidently, some screws have come off since your attorney days. You are a fricken' mess.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:43 amWhatever you say Marshall! That catcher is now the starting first baseman and is on pace for a 100 RBI season.Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:38 am While they are at it they need to see if the catcher who can't catch and has a sizzling 730 OPS would wave his no trade clause.
You see...unlike your boy, Burly, Contreras can actually run and hit more than just singles!
Shady...we all know this is you! At least you stopped using racist socks! No wonder Mary left you!!!
True. But this isn't the first guy that caused a dilemma. Guys like Nado come with the good years, and the declining years. Other teams are not excited about getting the declining years if they have to pay his whole salary. But if they released him then the other team doesn't have to pay much for his services and he would have more than one suitor.
Still waiting for an answer Sideshow.Melville wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 08:32 amSuper Slo Mo had N/A traded twice.
The first time, N/A refused to go to Houston.
The second time, when Mo wisely declined the Yankees offer of Stroman in return, The Yankees made a different offer and DeWitt refused to eat what I believe was around 15M for the Yankees to simply take N/A off STL's hands.
In other words, there were at least 2 known matches last offseason.
Should be even easier now.
Two reasons.
One, as others have noted, N/A is only owed an average of 15.5M the next 2 years and there will be only about 8M remaining for this season at the deadline.
Two, N/A's defense has improved compared to the prior 2 seasons and his bat has stabilized at last year's level without further decline - which gives other teams a bit more certainty as to what they would be acquiring.
Now, it would certainly be helpful if N/A could hit reasonably well over the next 30 days.
But if he simply plays as he has so far this year, a trade should be quite simple to accommodate - albeit with very limited return.
Now, there is one, shall we say, wildcard.
N/A claims to want to win a WS ring - or at least have a shot at one in the postseason - before he hangs up his cleats.
But, that clearly is not really true.
What N/A really wants is to be comfortable, to be at ease, to be free from scrutiny - while teammates carry the load of expectations and leadership.
And that just might compel him to stay right where he is at.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
Hi ShadyHonky Tonk Man wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:38 am While they are at it they need to see if the catcher who can't catch and has a sizzling 730 OPS would wave his no trade clause.
Says the guy with 8 or 9 verifiable Facebook accounts and untold sock accounts.Shady wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 19:17 pmYou are a demented idiot. Evidently, some screws have come off since your attorney days. You are a fricken' mess.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:43 amWhatever you say Marshall! That catcher is now the starting first baseman and is on pace for a 100 RBI season.Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑11 Jun 2025 07:38 am While they are at it they need to see if the catcher who can't catch and has a sizzling 730 OPS would wave his no trade clause.
You see...unlike your boy, Burly, Contreras can actually run and hit more than just singles!
Shady...we all know this is you! At least you stopped using racist socks! No wonder Mary left you!!!