Page 2 of 2

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 18:28 pm
by scoutyjones2
82birds wrote: 16 May 2025 16:51 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 16 May 2025 16:44 pm I’m surprised you didn’t include Corbin burnes that’s who most people wanted. I remember a couple wanting Montgomery I don’t remember any want hicks and a few strange people wanting Flaherty back but most wanted an ace like pitcher like burnes strange you didn’t include him
I think the OP was just about guys who used to be Cardinals
:lol:

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
by hullie
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 19:29 pm
by Ozziesfan41
82birds wrote: 16 May 2025 16:51 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 16 May 2025 16:44 pm I’m surprised you didn’t include Corbin burnes that’s who most people wanted. I remember a couple wanting Montgomery I don’t remember any want hicks and a few strange people wanting Flaherty back but most wanted an ace like pitcher like burnes strange you didn’t include him
I think the OP was just about guys who used to be Cardinals
He never specified former cardinals he said a lot of people wanted these players and asked if he’s leaving anyone out and said build SP from within. So I think he was just coming up players who some wanted who sucked to prove his point about building SP from within

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 20:11 pm
by ClassicO
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 17:54 pm I would have gladly re-signed Jack on his contract for last year or the one he signed this offseason. I don't miss Hicks on that contract, nor Monty.
I didn’t see Jack as above forward when the team had to rebuild or refresh.
But two years and $35M coming off a good year wasn’t a bad signing even if he has struggled so far in Detroit.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 20:59 pm
by rbirules
ClassicO wrote: 16 May 2025 20:11 pm
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 17:54 pm I would have gladly re-signed Jack on his contract for last year or the one he signed this offseason. I don't miss Hicks on that contract, nor Monty.
I didn’t see Jack as above forward when the team had to rebuild or refresh.
But two years and $35M coming off a good year wasn’t a bad signing even if he has struggled so far in Detroit.
His struggles look mostly HR/FB% related which takes a while to stabilize. His xFIP is 3.35 or something like that. That's not enough to change my mind on that contract yet.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 21:04 pm
by ClassicO
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 20:59 pm
ClassicO wrote: 16 May 2025 20:11 pm
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 17:54 pm I would have gladly re-signed Jack on his contract for last year or the one he signed this offseason. I don't miss Hicks on that contract, nor Monty.
I didn’t see Jack as above forward when the team had to rebuild or refresh.
But two years and $35M coming off a good year wasn’t a bad signing even if he has struggled so far in Detroit.
His struggles look mostly HR/FB% related which takes a while to stabilize. His xFIP is 3.35 or something like that. That's not enough to change my mind on that contract yet.
Good point but…
Who would he have bumped from the rotation? They needed Libby to find himself. Heck, I’m looking for McGreevy to come up (after dumping 1-2 starters).

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 21:45 pm
by jw0595
TraveledLessRoad wrote: 16 May 2025 15:00 pm
Futuregm2 wrote: 16 May 2025 14:37 pm
TraveledLessRoad wrote: 16 May 2025 14:31 pm Jordan Hicks 11 mil a year for a 6.75 ERA...almost can't afford not to

And he pitched 6 shutout innings in his first start of the season in his 1 win. Ever since then he’s been brutal. He’s given up 7+ hits in 5 of his 9 starts.
Yeah, I actually went back through his game logs and saw that. Tough to succeed as an MLB starter with a 1.5 pitch arsenal assortment
I agree, but Lance Lynn did it.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 16 May 2025 22:46 pm
by rbirules
ClassicO wrote: 16 May 2025 21:04 pm
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 20:59 pm
ClassicO wrote: 16 May 2025 20:11 pm
rbirules wrote: 16 May 2025 17:54 pm I would have gladly re-signed Jack on his contract for last year or the one he signed this offseason. I don't miss Hicks on that contract, nor Monty.
I didn’t see Jack as above forward when the team had to rebuild or refresh.
But two years and $35M coming off a good year wasn’t a bad signing even if he has struggled so far in Detroit.
His struggles look mostly HR/FB% related which takes a while to stabilize. His xFIP is 3.35 or something like that. That's not enough to change my mind on that contract yet.
Good point but…
Who would he have bumped from the rotation? They needed Libby to find himself. Heck, I’m looking for McGreevy to come up (after dumping 1-2 starters).
Depends how far you go back. If they signed him last year you probably don't trade Edman for Fedde, probably don't sign one if Lynn or Gibson. Or maybe they trade Jack last year at the deadline.

The decision to part with all three was not made this past offseason. But this much later Jack is the only one I wish we had re-signed.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 02:38 am
by Carp4Cy
ClassicO wrote: 16 May 2025 13:41 pm A lot of folks wanted to sign one or more of these guys. Not exactly lighting it up...
2 Ws, 10Ls between them and Monty only threw one inning before IL.

Am I leaving out anyone?
Build SP from within.
Hicks and Flaherty came from within. Why will future pitchers from our system be better?

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 06:09 am
by russellhammond
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.
Tommy Edman is hitting .252 and is on the IL. but maybe that qualifies as "killing it."

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 06:54 am
by 2ninr
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.
Edman hasn't played since April 29

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 08:11 am
by Nicodemus
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Randy Arozorena has settled in to a pretty average player. The Libby trade is turning in the Cardinals' favor.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 10:01 am
by hullie
russellhammond wrote: 17 May 2025 06:09 am
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.
Tommy Edman is hitting .252 and is on the IL. but maybe that qualifies as "killing it."
I knew he was hurt. Just thought the 24 rbis were impressive

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 10:09 am
by ClassicO
hullie wrote: 17 May 2025 10:01 am
russellhammond wrote: 17 May 2025 06:09 am
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.
Tommy Edman is hitting .252 and is on the IL. but maybe that qualifies as "killing it."
I knew he was hurt. Just thought the 24 rbis were impressive
No matter how some here want to downplay Edman's success—yes, those RBIs are impressive, as is his versatility.
I was fine with the trade at the time (the only test in my mind), and I wish him success.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 10:32 am
by hullie
ClassicO wrote: 17 May 2025 10:09 am
hullie wrote: 17 May 2025 10:01 am
russellhammond wrote: 17 May 2025 06:09 am
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 18:29 pm
Mr Buttercup wrote: 16 May 2025 18:26 pm
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Shelby Miller putting up good numbers in a relief role. 3-0, 1.45 era.
Nice. Think Carson Kelly is having a pretty good year himself. Wacha has an era under 3. Tommy Edman is killing it.
Tommy Edman is hitting .252 and is on the IL. but maybe that qualifies as "killing it."
I knew he was hurt. Just thought the 24 rbis were impressive
No matter how some here want to downplay Edman's success—yes, those RBIs are impressive, as is his versatility.
I was fine with the trade at the time (the only test in my mind), and I wish him success.
I wish we still had him but I get why we don’t.

Re: Montgomery, Hicks and Flaherty

Posted: 17 May 2025 11:16 am
by moose-and-squirrel
Nicodemus wrote: 17 May 2025 08:11 am
hullie wrote: 16 May 2025 17:23 pm Any ex cardinals doing well? Can’t remember them all. Zach and Sandy aren’t exactly tearing it up
Randy Arozorena has settled in to a pretty average player. The Libby trade is turning in the Cardinals' favor.
yup. weren't Aroz and Garcia PED guys?