Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Shady
Forum User
Posts: 5226
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Shady »

Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 6923
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Futuregm2 »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Why does it not add up? He’s chasing more than ever. Even last year in his “breakout” year he had a .735 OPS, which is below what you’d want to see for any player like him. In 2024 he had 58% of his RBI over a 2 month period and 62% of his HRs over a 2 month period. He was bad in 2023 and was given far too much PT. And he’s stunk this year. And his expected numbers are worse. His expected average is .209 and expected SLG is below .300.
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1071
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by NYCardsFan »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
It adds up if you'd just pull your head out of the sand and listen to what so many people have been telling you for over two years.

Just a few days ago, you claimed the Cardinals know what they have in Saggese after just 40 PAs, so why aren't 1,087 PAs enough for them to know what Burleson is? Why does Burleson deserve far more "leash" than you've ever been willing to give any other Cardinals player? Sure seems like a glaring double standard, Shady.
Last edited by NYCardsFan on 02 May 2025 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mort Gage
Forum User
Posts: 1839
Joined: 31 May 2023 13:27 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Mort Gage »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 9259
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Cusecards »

If they have determined it is best to move Herrera to DH and/or another position fine.
But....since this is a bit of a transition it doesn’t hurt to evaluate his catching a bit longer.
Either way I expect his bat will be in the lineup.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 9728
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by rockondlouie »

[quote=Melville post_id=13016016 time=1746192272 user_id=338298
He should have been moved to outfield 2 years ago as I was first to understand and advise 2 years ago.
That is where his RH bat is needed.
[/quote]

No you weren't :wink:
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 5226
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Shady »

Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 10:49 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
"They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's". Gorman is almost as much of a delimma as Burleson is. As is Walker.
Last edited by Shady on 02 May 2025 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 17540
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by craviduce »

I thought this thread was supposed to be about Oli's seriousness on Herrera getting at least an at bat at DH.

Why does every Shady thread have to be hijacked by himself and turned into a Burleson thread by the 2nd page?

-------------------

Oli will get Herrera at least an at bat at DH. TRUE.

and he's considering it.....also TRUE
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 5226
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Shady »

craviduce wrote: 02 May 2025 11:04 am I thought this thread was supposed to be about Oli's seriousness on Herrera getting at least an at bat at DH.

Why does every Shady thread have to be hijacked by himself and turned into a Burleson thread by the 2nd page?

-------------------

Oli will get Herrera at least an at bat at DH. TRUE.

and he's considering it.....also TRUE
Relax and just try to discuss Cardinals baseball. Your consternation is unwarranted. You are the one that is the primary hijack culprit. You just have to bring in some Shady criticism. Grow up !
Last edited by Shady on 02 May 2025 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 17540
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by craviduce »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:07 am
craviduce wrote: 02 May 2025 11:04 am I thought this thread was supposed to be about Oli's seriousness on Herrera getting at least an at bat at DH.

Why does every Shady thread have to be hijacked by himself and turned into a Burleson thread by the 2nd page?

-------------------

Oli will get Herrera at least an at bat at DH. TRUE.

and he's considering it.....also TRUE
Relax and just talk Cardinals baseball. Your consternation is unwarranted. You are the one the is the primary hijack culprit. You just have to bring in some Shady criticism. Grow up !
they spiked the Lime Jello again, didn't they?
renostl
Forum User
Posts: 2226
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by renostl »

Futuregm2 wrote: 02 May 2025 09:54 am
Melville wrote: 01 May 2025 22:34 pm
Shady wrote: 01 May 2025 09:26 am Could that be the most prudent way to utilize what Herrera does best, hit? And stay away from where he is suspect. Especially, considering what the other catchers bring. As well as looking ahead to the catchers coming along in the organization.
That would require keeping Pages, Pozo, and Herrera on the active roster - which is not practical.
Why is it not practical? Send down Baker when Herrera comes back. He doesn’t bring much to the roster and is 4 for 28 over his last 34 PA. He has a career .327 SLG% now.
It could happen, probably should.

Unless there are concerns about IH knees, I don't
think they pull the plug on IH in the catcher position
for Pozo.

I'd give him a 1B mitt and look for a team for WC if me.
Yeah there's that whole NTC thing.
Mort Gage
Forum User
Posts: 1839
Joined: 31 May 2023 13:27 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Mort Gage »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:01 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 10:49 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
"They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's". Gorman is almost as much of a delimma as Burleson is. As is Walker.
True, but unlike Burleson those two have high ceilings.
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 5226
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Shady »

Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 11:20 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:01 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 10:49 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
"They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's". Gorman is almost as much of a delimma as Burleson is. As is Walker.
True, but unlike Burleson those two have high ceilings.
Problem is, they both have been in the basement, offensively, for too long.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3036
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by ecleme22 »

rockondlouie wrote: 02 May 2025 08:51 am Only been suggested by a handful of us for a long time. :roll:
I’m beginning to think something is wrong with you.

You called Pages a ‘JAG’ all of spring training and made it very clear Herrera should be the starting catcher.

Here’s one thread example: viewtopic.php?p=12952214&hilit=Pages#p12952214
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 6923
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by Futuregm2 »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:27 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 11:20 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:01 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 10:49 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
"They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's". Gorman is almost as much of a delimma as Burleson is. As is Walker.
True, but unlike Burleson those two have high ceilings.
Problem is, they both have been in the basement, offensively, for too long.
Burleson: Career .699 OPS
Gorman: Career .731 OPS
Walker: Career .713 OPS
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1071
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Should Oli seriously consider Herrera as the DH?

Post by NYCardsFan »

Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:27 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 11:20 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 11:01 am
Mort Gage wrote: 02 May 2025 10:49 am
Shady wrote: 02 May 2025 10:20 am Burleson's hitting drought doesn't add up. I feel the Cardinals know that. And will give him a lot of leash to get back on track. Until he does, Herrera has to be given some DH time when he returns.
Burleson is a AAAA player and it seems the FO finally realizes it. They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's. I doubt Bloom keeps him next year. He will start a game or two a week but if they are smart his leash stays retracted. He certainly isn't a comp to Carew or Votto.
"They no longer allow Oli to prioritize his PT over Gorman's". Gorman is almost as much of a delimma as Burleson is. As is Walker.
True, but unlike Burleson those two have high ceilings.
Problem is, they both have been in the basement, offensively, for too long.

Player/PAs/wRC+/OPS+

Gorman: 1,244/102/101
Walker: 754/97/95
Burleson: 1,087/94/93
Post Reply