STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1508771
Flashbacks.
So just to be clear....you did not create or use these profiles? "Buttercup" to that list. Yes or NO.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:29 pmYou continue to be a worthless contributor to baseball discussion.I know you don't have what it takes to venture, even a guess, as to how you feel Burleson will do in '25.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmokShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:25 pmSo you don't have the fortitude to even venture a guess as to how that "below average player" will do in '25? And you accuse me of not being serious about discussing baseball. "The proof is in the pudding".Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:20 pmI'm not playing your juvenile game since you are not serious about discussing baseball. You create thread after thread about Burleson, or hijack threads (including your own) to make it all about Burleson. Stop acting like an imbecile and quit drooling over a below average player. Act in good faith and people will be happy to talk baseball with you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:15 pmSo how do you see it for Walker, Gorman and Burleson in '25?Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Wally
Robert Shelton
Shady
Hardmaple
Sanusual6
Etc
Still feel Burly ends up on first? Stupid. Contreras is a far superior hitter and I'm willing to bet money he's a better fielding first baseman. Former catchers typically have no issue transitioning to first.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmBurleson is a heckuva lot better first baseman than many seem to feel. He'd be fine there if it don't work out for Contreras.
You are simply worthless at baseball discussion.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmSo just to be clear....you did not create or use these profiles? "Buttercup" to that list. Yes or NO.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:29 pmYou continue to be a worthless contributor to baseball discussion.I know you don't have what it takes to venture, even a guess, as to how you feel Burleson will do in '25.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmokShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:25 pmSo you don't have the fortitude to even venture a guess as to how that "below average player" will do in '25? And you accuse me of not being serious about discussing baseball. "The proof is in the pudding".Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:20 pmI'm not playing your juvenile game since you are not serious about discussing baseball. You create thread after thread about Burleson, or hijack threads (including your own) to make it all about Burleson. Stop acting like an imbecile and quit drooling over a below average player. Act in good faith and people will be happy to talk baseball with you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:15 pmSo how do you see it for Walker, Gorman and Burleson in '25?Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Wally
Robert Shelton
Shady
Hardmaple
Sanusual6
Etc
Careful how you answer. People with receipts can and will provide the proof.
Why's that? It's baseball discussion regarding some key Cardinals players. Chill. Try contributing something relevant to the discussion.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmFlashbacks.
You can just sense the ban percolating.
It will be glorious
Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:41 pmYou are simply worthless at baseball discussion.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmSo just to be clear....you did not create or use these profiles? "Buttercup" to that list. Yes or NO.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:29 pmYou continue to be a worthless contributor to baseball discussion.I know you don't have what it takes to venture, even a guess, as to how you feel Burleson will do in '25.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmokShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:25 pmSo you don't have the fortitude to even venture a guess as to how that "below average player" will do in '25? And you accuse me of not being serious about discussing baseball. "The proof is in the pudding".Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:20 pmI'm not playing your juvenile game since you are not serious about discussing baseball. You create thread after thread about Burleson, or hijack threads (including your own) to make it all about Burleson. Stop acting like an imbecile and quit drooling over a below average player. Act in good faith and people will be happy to talk baseball with you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:15 pmSo how do you see it for Walker, Gorman and Burleson in '25?Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Wally
Robert Shelton
Shady
Hardmaple
Sanusual6
Etc
Careful how you answer. People with receipts can and will provide the proof.
He sure didn't deny it...Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:41 pmYou are simply worthless at baseball discussion.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmSo just to be clear....you did not create or use these profiles? "Buttercup" to that list. Yes or NO.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:29 pmYou continue to be a worthless contributor to baseball discussion.I know you don't have what it takes to venture, even a guess, as to how you feel Burleson will do in '25.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmokShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:25 pmSo you don't have the fortitude to even venture a guess as to how that "below average player" will do in '25? And you accuse me of not being serious about discussing baseball. "The proof is in the pudding".Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:20 pmI'm not playing your juvenile game since you are not serious about discussing baseball. You create thread after thread about Burleson, or hijack threads (including your own) to make it all about Burleson. Stop acting like an imbecile and quit drooling over a below average player. Act in good faith and people will be happy to talk baseball with you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:15 pmSo how do you see it for Walker, Gorman and Burleson in '25?Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Wally
Robert Shelton
Shady
Hardmaple
Sanusual6
Etc
Careful how you answer. People with receipts can and will provide the proof.
Nope. He's an outed coward. Who doxed herself. Nobody takes her/him/it/them seriously. Anywhere.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:56 pmHe sure didn't deny it...Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:41 pmYou are simply worthless at baseball discussion.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmSo just to be clear....you did not create or use these profiles? "Buttercup" to that list. Yes or NO.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:29 pmYou continue to be a worthless contributor to baseball discussion.I know you don't have what it takes to venture, even a guess, as to how you feel Burleson will do in '25.Drewman+ wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:27 pmokShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:25 pmSo you don't have the fortitude to even venture a guess as to how that "below average player" will do in '25? And you accuse me of not being serious about discussing baseball. "The proof is in the pudding".Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:20 pmI'm not playing your juvenile game since you are not serious about discussing baseball. You create thread after thread about Burleson, or hijack threads (including your own) to make it all about Burleson. Stop acting like an imbecile and quit drooling over a below average player. Act in good faith and people will be happy to talk baseball with you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:15 pmSo how do you see it for Walker, Gorman and Burleson in '25?Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Wally
Robert Shelton
Shady
Hardmaple
Sanusual6
Etc
Careful how you answer. People with receipts can and will provide the proof.
Another step closer...get the popcorn warmingShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:42 pmWhy's that? It's baseball discussion regarding some key Cardinals players. Chill. Try contributing something relevant to the discussion.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmFlashbacks.
You can just sense the ban percolating.
It will be glorious
this^, 100% this.Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Someone recently defined the normal pattern mable exhibits prior to a full meltdown. (Mort?) We're almost there.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 17:12 pmAnother step closer...get the popcorn warmingShady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:42 pmWhy's that? It's baseball discussion regarding some key Cardinals players. Chill. Try contributing something relevant to the discussion.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:35 pmFlashbacks.
You can just sense the ban percolating.
It will be glorious
"So far in their careers both Walker and Gorman have hit better than Burleson". So where was this superior Walker and Gorman production last season when Burleson was leading the team in RBIs?cardstatman wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 17:23 pm So far in their careers both Walker and Gorman have hit better than Burleson. Both also have higher ceilings at the plate than Burleson.
.255 .317 .423 .740 643 Walker age 22
.222 .301 .435 .737 1179 Gorman age 24
.256 .307 .402 .709 995 Burleson age 25
The problem is that all three of them resemble Michael Jackson.
They all wear a glove on one hand for no apparent reason!
Outs Above Average / Position / Innings
-20 2B 2000 Gorman
0 1B 127 Gorman
-20 Total 2127 Gorman
-11 RF 1139 Walker
-7 LF 152 Walker
-18 Total 1291 Walker
-8 LF 539 Burleson
-8 RF 474 Burleson
-2 1B 150 Burleson
-18 Total 1163 Burleson
My opinion: Trade high on Burleson right now. This frees up playing time for others just as much as trading Arenado.
Did you create and post under the handle "PureVida" too . He uses lots of "quotes" like you.Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:32 pmOK, let's see your offensive stats predictions for Burleson in '25. It seems you feel he should just be DFAed.Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:30 pmExactly. But ole Shady/Maple/Wally/Robert E will never understand.Mort Gage wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 16:11 pmI don't recall "most posters" writing that. What people posted was that a 104 OPS+, 41 XBH, and 78 RBI in 595 PA is not the amazing feat you believe it is. Especially for a guy who can't run or field. I have no idea how productive Gorman and Walker will be this season.
Well, he said in their "careers".Shady wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 17:34 pm"So far in their careers both Walker and Gorman have hit better than Burleson". So where was this superior Walker and Gorman production last season when Burleson was leading the team in RBIs?cardstatman wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025 17:23 pm So far in their careers both Walker and Gorman have hit better than Burleson. Both also have higher ceilings at the plate than Burleson.
.255 .317 .423 .740 643 Walker age 22
.222 .301 .435 .737 1179 Gorman age 24
.256 .307 .402 .709 995 Burleson age 25
The problem is that all three of them resemble Michael Jackson.
They all wear a glove on one hand for no apparent reason!
Outs Above Average / Position / Innings
-20 2B 2000 Gorman
0 1B 127 Gorman
-20 Total 2127 Gorman
-11 RF 1139 Walker
-7 LF 152 Walker
-18 Total 1291 Walker
-8 LF 539 Burleson
-8 RF 474 Burleson
-2 1B 150 Burleson
-18 Total 1163 Burleson
My opinion: Trade high on Burleson right now. This frees up playing time for others just as much as trading Arenado.