STLtoday.com

Posted: **16 May 2025 07:16 am**

Rojo Johnson wrote: ↑14 May 2025 13:58 pm In.

No

Posted: **16 May 2025 07:41 am**

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑15 May 2025 15:41 pm
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑15 May 2025 12:46 pm
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑15 May 2025 10:15 am
desertrat23 wrote: ↑15 May 2025 10:10 am One of the most fundamental goal in baseball is to get a hit.
The best kind of hit is a home run.

It’s comical that neither the guy who has the most hits nor the guy who has the most “best kind of hits” are not in the Hall of Fame.

Put Pete in, explain the gambling on his plaque.
Your vote one on panel 4.

Overall 34-15
Panel four is 3-1 In. 37-16 overall. .698 percent. Need 75.
The fourth group of posters are at 5-2 In. That’s 42-18 In. 69 percent ish.

The fourth panel is currently 7-5. In that is 44-23. 67 percent.

This will be the third straight panel to say no.

Posted: **16 May 2025 12:00 pm**

The sign is hung up in EVERY clubhouse. No betting on baseball or else you are gone.
Rose saw the sign everyday and made a conscious decision to ignore it and bet on the game.
Acknowledge the guy for being the hits leader (because someone got them)…but inducting him into the HOF? No way, no how.
Pete made that choice daily for himself.

I think I’m going to go rob a bank tonight. I know it’s illegal and I could go to jail if caught, but I’m going to do it anyway.
(Dumb logic). If I get caught, should I not have to suffer the KNOWN consequences of my actions?

Posted: **16 May 2025 12:09 pm**

Posted: **16 May 2025 12:43 pm**

Bubble4427 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:00 pm The sign is hung up in EVERY clubhouse. No betting on baseball or else you are gone.
Rose saw the sign everyday and made a conscious decision to ignore it and bet on the game.
Acknowledge the guy for being the hits leader (because someone got them)…but inducting him into the HOF? No way, no how.
Pete made that choice daily for himself.

I think I’m going to go rob a bank tonight. I know it’s illegal and I could go to jail if caught, but I’m going to do it anyway.
(Dumb logic). If I get caught, should I not have to suffer the KNOWN consequences of my actions?

+1

Posted: **16 May 2025 14:46 pm**

Monsieur De Treville wrote: ↑15 May 2025 15:17 pm
slimjay63801 wrote: ↑14 May 2025 08:59 am
Swuhgen wrote: ↑14 May 2025 08:57 am In.

Joe Jackson better go in first.
Will Joe Jackson be in or will he be "Steppin Out"?
Is she really going out with him?

Well they better look sharp because that's just beat crazy! I read about it in the Sunday papers.

Posted: **20 May 2025 08:11 am**

Panel four is 7-7. A not in vote. Tally 44-25. Mid sixty percent. Needs 75.

Posted: **20 May 2025 08:12 am**

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 May 2025 08:41 am Good morning

This is an exercise in discipline. Just one word answer. Keep it simple silly.

Me- IN.

In for sure.
Never should have been out anyway.

Posted: **20 May 2025 11:59 am**

Bubble4427 wrote: ↑16 May 2025 12:00 pm The sign is hung up in EVERY clubhouse. No betting on baseball or else you are gone.
Rose saw the sign everyday and made a conscious decision to ignore it and bet on the game.
Acknowledge the guy for being the hits leader (because someone got them)…but inducting him into the HOF? No way, no how.
Pete made that choice daily for himself.

I think I’m going to go rob a bank tonight. I know it’s illegal and I could go to jail if caught, but I’m going to do it anyway.
(Dumb logic). If I get caught, should I not have to suffer the KNOWN consequences of my actions?

He purposefully broke a black and white rule.
Not entirely the same, nor were you saying it is,since Rose only risked an honorary appointment.

He's still the hit king. All records intact along with his place in baseball lore.
Still an all-time great. If we are ok with changing that criteria because of
his achievements, why have them.

Posted: **20 May 2025 12:10 pm**

I'm all IN!

Posted: **20 May 2025 12:22 pm**

Panel four complete. 9-7 In but need 12.

Posted: **20 May 2025 12:41 pm**

The updated tally is 43-21, 66 percent. We ran four panels which would simulate four years of voting. Panel one was unanimous 14-2. In

The other three panels did not get him in/ each panel. With results getting worse by the panel.

As for our exercise if he don’t get in first year, he might not get in.

Posted: **20 May 2025 12:42 pm**

STLtoday.com

CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out

Re: CT poll- Rose in/out