Re: For the Matheny haters
Posted: 19 Aug 2025 08:31 am
So was Tommy not available for def replacement?Lloyd Braun wrote: ↑19 Aug 2025 07:59 amYikes, don't let Ecleme see this. well, doesn't matter if he sees it, he'll ignore it and claim that K rate is Matheny's faultAn Old Friend wrote: ↑18 Aug 2025 18:45 pm394 players had at least 150 plate appearances in 2016.Lloyd Braun wrote: ↑18 Aug 2025 14:55 pmTommy Pham had a -0.3 WAR in 2016 and was literally going blind dealing with eye issues.ecleme22 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2025 14:50 pmThat was my 'back up' stat. LOL.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2025 14:41 pm
And who can forget 2016 he started Tommy Pham 1 game in September while playing moss everyday to go .099 9-91. Even if Pham wasn’t hitting well he was hitting better than moss and played much better defense. The cardinals missed the playoffs by 1 game because MM preferred the poor defensive non hitting moss over Pham who speed power and defense could have helped the team in that stretch
So odd the way Matheny played Pham. But back to your example, yeah, he not only started Moss in LF, but Moss had so many COMPLETE GAMES that month. From memory, Pham had one start in Sept———but was pulled in the 4th! Had 19 PAs from 9/2 to 10/2.
Also, last series of the year in 2016 vs. Pit:
Moss: 3 starts.
Pham: 0 starts, but appeared in all three games. No PAs...
Pathetic if this is truly an example of you guys thinking this is proof Matheny was a bad manager.
This is literally proof you have nothing to back up your arguments.
Tommy Pham was 394th in strikeout rate at 38.8%