St. Louis Blues: B+
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
opti mist
- Forum User
- Posts: 379
- Joined: 24 May 2024 13:54 pm
St. Louis Blues: B+
The Blues needed centers, a veteran defenseman and toughness, and they got all three. They traded for Anaheim’s Mason McTavish, who will be the No. 2 center, and drafted centers Tynan Lawrence (No. 11 overall) and Maddox Dagenais (No. 16). They traded for defenseman Brandon Carlo, which will allow 2024 first-round pick Adam Jiricek to grow at his own rate. And they signed enforcer Ross Johnston, who will make opponents think twice. None of the moves were flashy, but they were necessary.
— Jeremy Rutherford
— Jeremy Rutherford
-
Army's Mom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
B+ seems a little generous, IMHO.
I would say B- for now, elevating to a B if MM can hold down the 2C role until DD forces the issue.
I would say B- for now, elevating to a B if MM can hold down the 2C role until DD forces the issue.
-
General
- Forum User
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:47 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
The grade is about process and potential and not results bc you can’t measure results until they play games.Army's Mom wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 15:44 pm B+ seems a little generous, IMHO.
I would say B- for now, elevating to a B if MM can hold down the 2C role until DD forces the issue.
-
Whatashame
- Forum User
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: 24 May 2018 20:27 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
IMO, the grade is pretty accurate. The Blues had specific needs and they addressed those needs. Added depth at the C position and added a solid RH Dman. Now all we need is for McTavish, McMichael and Carlo to be what we hope they are.
-
Aesa
- Forum User
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:51 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
I think you meant McT not McM.Army's Mom wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 15:44 pm B+ seems a little generous, IMHO.
I would say B- for now, elevating to a B if MM can hold down the 2C role until DD forces the issue.
-
tfriede2
- Forum User
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 25 May 2024 21:54 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
MM = Mason McTavishAesa wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 16:49 pmI think you meant McT not McM.Army's Mom wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 15:44 pm B+ seems a little generous, IMHO.
I would say B- for now, elevating to a B if MM can hold down the 2C role until DD forces the issue.![]()
-
Aesa
- Forum User
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:51 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
No, MM = Marilyn Manson or Marilyn Monroe or Michael Mathers.
Last edited by Aesa on 04 Jul 2026 17:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Army's Mom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
-
Aesa
- Forum User
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:51 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
Army's Mom wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 17:00 pmLol. Touche!
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 693
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
Sounds about right. We upgraded our 2 biggest needs in C and RD. Lawrence is a great pick at an important position. Seems pretty good to me.
-
dhsux
- Forum User
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
Gonna go with the B+ for now and see if the final exam can get them to an A+.
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
As always, these stories lack any true insight.
The most noticeable aspect of this draft is that the great re-whatever was supposed to fill all these same holes. And yet, here we are…. Fans are just supposed to be happy that the Blues are potentially filling the biggest potholes as though this is some new revelation
Such [nonsense] Blues coverage. So lame.
The most noticeable aspect of this draft is that the great re-whatever was supposed to fill all these same holes. And yet, here we are…. Fans are just supposed to be happy that the Blues are potentially filling the biggest potholes as though this is some new revelation
Such [nonsense] Blues coverage. So lame.
-
Moberly Blues
- Forum User
- Posts: 157
- Joined: 11 Oct 2022 06:56 am
- Location: Moberly,Mo
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
Grass still mad USA beat Canada laughing
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
Still mad that other NHL teams get benefit amd promise and excitement from the NHL draft—while the Blues are fed little debbie desserts and told it is wonderful. For 20 years now.
-
Army's Mom
- Forum User
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: St. Louis Blues: B+
I dont disagree, I guess Im just more skeptical on the extent of the upgrade. If McTavish is as motivated as I think, can add a step, and commits to getting back on D, he'll stick as 2C and its a big win. If he comes in without having done the work to get quicker, it could backfire.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑04 Jul 2026 21:04 pm Sounds about right. We upgraded our 2 biggest needs in C and RD. Lawrence is a great pick at an important position. Seems pretty good to me.
If MM doesnt seize the role, then we're back to either DD (who is likely fine, but also needs to grow into the role) or CM (a player better suited to the wing).
Either way, we're deeper at center so I'll go with a positive grade, but how positive remains to be seen. JMO.