Byram 6/$75 mil

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 1731
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BleedingBleu »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:02 pm
Chris2fer wrote: 01 Jul 2026 14:28 pm Why would you pay that type of money for a defenseman who's not first out the gate for powerplay or penalty kill for any of the teams they've played on?
Look at the players that he was behind in Colorado and Buffalo - franchise cornerstones

If he's healthy he'll put up career highs.
Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
Natl20
Forum User
Posts: 1240
Joined: 23 Feb 2019 00:00 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by Natl20 »

BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:02 pm
Chris2fer wrote: 01 Jul 2026 14:28 pm Why would you pay that type of money for a defenseman who's not first out the gate for powerplay or penalty kill for any of the teams they've played on?
Look at the players that he was behind in Colorado and Buffalo - franchise cornerstones

If he's healthy he'll put up career highs.
Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
Ya i dont get the people who act like he played 4 mins a game because he was behind Dahlin and put up his point total.

He's played 20 - 22 mins a game for the last 4 years. How much more a game does he have to play to reach this 'career high'? What's that even mean lol, I guess if he hits 43 pts he put up a CAREER HIGH
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BalotelliMassive »

BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
The point I was making is that dude is going to be the top power play/penalty kill defenseman on the Hawks - he’s not second choice to all stars on Chicago.
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 1731
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BleedingBleu »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:59 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
The point I was making is that dude is going to be the top power play/penalty kill defenseman on the Hawks - he’s not second choice to all stars on Chicago.
Brock Faber didn’t seem to have that problem…. Hell, Zeev MF Buium produced better in 31 Games for the Wild.

Byram had the 8th most Powerplay Assists and 11th Highest Goals For Buffalo, when he was on the Ice during the Powerplay. He may have been playing 2nd fiddle to Dahlin, but the production was less than both Fowler & Faulk.

Buffalo had the 20th Best Powerplay. I wonder how much more he improved the 29th ranked PP if he was arguably worse than Fowler & Faulk on the 26th ranked PP?
Last edited by BleedingBleu on 01 Jul 2026 16:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BalotelliMassive »

BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 16:37 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:59 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
The point I was making is that dude is going to be the top power play/penalty kill defenseman on the Hawks - he’s not second choice to all stars on Chicago.
Brock Faber didn’t seem to have that problem…

Byram had the 8th most Powerplay Assists and 11th Highest Goals For Buffalo, when he was on the Ice during the Powerplay. He may have been playing 2nd fiddle to Dahlin, but the production was less than both Fowler & Faulk.

Buffalo had the 20th Best Powerplay. I wonder how much more he improved the 29th ranked PP if he was arguably worse than Fowler & Faulk on the 26th ranked PP?
Nerding out on stats is uber fun.
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 1731
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BleedingBleu »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 16:41 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 16:37 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:59 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
The point I was making is that dude is going to be the top power play/penalty kill defenseman on the Hawks - he’s not second choice to all stars on Chicago.
Brock Faber didn’t seem to have that problem…

Byram had the 8th most Powerplay Assists and 11th Highest Goals For Buffalo, when he was on the Ice during the Powerplay. He may have been playing 2nd fiddle to Dahlin, but the production was less than both Fowler & Faulk.

Buffalo had the 20th Best Powerplay. I wonder how much more he improved the 29th ranked PP if he was arguably worse than Fowler & Faulk on the 26th ranked PP?
Nerding out on stats is uber fun.
You’re so right. The Blackhawks wouldn’t have benefitted at all by selecting the best Defensive Prospect in the draft. In fact, trading that opportunity to burn $75M on a 2nd Line LHD on his 3rd team is totally worth that!

They just might finish 7th… in the division… if the Jets trade Hellebuyck!


Image
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BalotelliMassive »

Cool story bleu cheese :|
UMR-alum-05
Forum User
Posts: 1332
Joined: 21 May 2026 07:22 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by UMR-alum-05 »

Byram makes the makes better. They just over paid to get him and them overpaid to keep him.
Natl20
Forum User
Posts: 1240
Joined: 23 Feb 2019 00:00 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by Natl20 »

UMR-alum-05 wrote: 01 Jul 2026 18:05 pm Byram makes the makes better. They just over paid to get him and them overpaid to keep him.
Thats not saying much, 90% of the NHL would make them better they finish last every year
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 2740
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by skilles »

People are way misreading the climate, this deal starts is 27/28 when the cap is taking another huge jump to 113 million and the player is pretty rare in that he is 25,willing to sign long term with a losing team, and available.

Pretty rare combination.

They really triggered a major market correction when the announced the cap number for the next several years.
Natl20
Forum User
Posts: 1240
Joined: 23 Feb 2019 00:00 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by Natl20 »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 16:41 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 16:37 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:59 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 01 Jul 2026 15:14 pm Dude was averaging 22 minutes in Buffalo who finished on the opposite side of the standings from Chicago
The point I was making is that dude is going to be the top power play/penalty kill defenseman on the Hawks - he’s not second choice to all stars on Chicago.
Brock Faber didn’t seem to have that problem…

Byram had the 8th most Powerplay Assists and 11th Highest Goals For Buffalo, when he was on the Ice during the Powerplay. He may have been playing 2nd fiddle to Dahlin, but the production was less than both Fowler & Faulk.

Buffalo had the 20th Best Powerplay. I wonder how much more he improved the 29th ranked PP if he was arguably worse than Fowler & Faulk on the 26th ranked PP?
Nerding out on stats is uber fun.
That's his way of saying your right

Like stats mean nothing, what are u thinking using FACTS? Maybe the hawks can't afford a analytics department, not making enough from charging their fans to watch their garbage team :lol:
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BalotelliMassive »

skilles wrote: 01 Jul 2026 18:25 pm People are way misreading the climate, this deal starts is 27/28 when the cap is taking another huge jump to 113 million and the player is pretty rare in that he is 25,willing to sign long term with a losing team, and available.
Chicago has the following players under contract for 28-29

Frank Nazar 6.6m
Ryan Donato 4m
Cole Smith 3m
Byram 12.5m
Vlasic 4.6m
Knight 5.83m

36.53m total

Something tells me they’ll be alright.
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 2740
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by skilles »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 01 Jul 2026 19:06 pm
skilles wrote: 01 Jul 2026 18:25 pm People are way misreading the climate, this deal starts is 27/28 when the cap is taking another huge jump to 113 million and the player is pretty rare in that he is 25,willing to sign long term with a losing team, and available.
Chicago has the following players under contract for 28-29

Frank Nazar 6.6m
Ryan Donato 4m
Cole Smith 3m
Byram 12.5m
Vlasic 4.6m
Knight 5.83m

36.53m total

Something tells me they’ll be alright.
Right, some team should being worried about spending to much and some teams should be worried about finding players they can spend money on.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1913
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BalotelliMassive »

skilles wrote: 01 Jul 2026 19:19 pm Right, some team should being worried about spending to much and some teams should be worried about finding players they can spend money on.
I didn’t like the move originally but I’m warming up - every team had a different opinion of who was the best defenseman in the draft and there’s a solid chance that whoever they picked would not be better than Byram in his prime. They traded a fourth overall for a developed third overall. The price is sky high but you have to do something to lure players away from the Floridas, Vegas, Dallas etc.

My crystal ball is foggy so it looks like we might have to wait a year or two for an answer on how it worked out.
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 1731
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by BleedingBleu »

Image
Chris2fer
Forum User
Posts: 79
Joined: 10 Jul 2024 18:38 pm

Re: Byram 6/$75 mil

Post by Chris2fer »

Never said he wouldn't make them better, but giving up a 4th plus assets AND give 12.5 for a guy that was 3rd best on his team? You're betting heavy on potential. Wonder what Bedard's next contract is going to look like with that pay structure on the team.

If he doesn't become top 5 in the league at minimum, it's a miss and a potential GM killer.