Binner
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: Binner
3rd round pick….maybe a second.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
Nothing more.
-
TBone
- Forum User
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am
Re: Binner
I think he's defintiely in play as a trade chip leading up to the draft.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
It'll be interesting to see if the Blues see Zherenko or Georgi Romanov (if he stays red hot) as in-house second goalie options next year.
-
Tony Palazzolo
- Forum User
- Posts: 390
- Joined: 24 May 2024 10:13 am
Re: Binner
I don't think he's traded in the offseason unless he request it. I think they laid it out to him, whoever is playing better will get more starts. Depending on what happens during the season he may get traded. Don't expect to get much back, there just isn't huge returns for goalies.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
-
Zizzle1297
- Forum User
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 08 May 2023 21:08 pm
Re: Binner
I could see florida as a team wanting more picks.
Binner, 15th, and 30th for something?
Binner, 15th, and 30th for something?
-
Old_Goat
- Forum User
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: 28 Dec 2024 08:46 am
Re: Binner
No.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
We now have him on a one-year contract. He's an experienced proven big-game goalie. We now have a good tandem. IF the Blues appear to not be realistically in the run for the Cup next Spring, then trade him to a desperate contender at the Deadline and get as much as you can....And then re-sign him as a UFA in the Summer for a lesser salary as discussed before. Let him know ahead of time what the intention is. He is not dumb, he knows he needs to share the time with a likely lesser amount of play. He also knows that could extend his career, so more time at lesser $ = less time at more $.
And don't forget there is always a possibility of injury to Hofer. Whom do you turn to then if you trade him now??
It's not like the Blues are intentionally trying to lose for a rebuild, with no hope for Binnington to ever be part of winning again. Binnington is valuable for many intangible reasons as well. Being here for a few more years is a good fit for him and for the Blues.
-
Inglewood Jack
- Forum User
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm
Re: Binner
If in season, one would think his play is mediocre at best, and the return will be a bag of pucks. If he is playing well to lights out then he will likely not be traded, especially if Hofer is having an off season. If both are playing well then it is playoff hockey time and no trades.Tony Palazzolo wrote: ↑11 May 2026 07:00 amI don't think he's traded in the offseason unless he request it. I think they laid it out to him, whoever is playing better will get more starts. Depending on what happens during the season he may get traded. Don't expect to get much back, there just isn't huge returns for goalies.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
-
dhsux
- Forum User
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm
Re: Binner
Pretty much agree with a caveat.Old_Goat wrote: ↑11 May 2026 07:35 amNo.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
We now have him on a one-year contract. He's an experienced proven big-game goalie. We now have a good tandem. IF the Blues appear to not be realistically in the run for the Cup next Spring, then trade him to a desperate contender at the Deadline and get as much as you can....And then re-sign him as a UFA in the Summer for a lesser salary as discussed before. Let him know ahead of time what the intention is. He is not dumb, he knows he needs to share the time with a likely lesser amount of play. He also knows that could extend his career, so more time at lesser $ = less time at more $.
And don't forget there is always a possibility of injury to Hofer. Whom do you turn to then if you trade him now??
It's not like the Blues are intentionally trying to lose for a rebuild, with no hope for Binnington to ever be part of winning again. Binnington is valuable for many intangible reasons as well. Being here for a few more years is a good fit for him and for the Blues.
If JB is told he's #2 and wants out, all bets are off I think the Blues reluctantly oblige.
However I would think the Blues would say it's open competition on a continuing basis with these two.
But to put a 2nd or 3rd on his value, which may well be right I don't know, is to say to keep him right where he is imo.
-
stljrs
- Forum User
- Posts: 204
- Joined: 01 Feb 2018 09:17 am
Re: Binner
How about our 15th and Binner 50% retained for FL 9th? FL needs cap space and a goalie.
-
Hazelwood72
- Forum User
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Binner
Very well stated, and I think you hit the nail on the head.Old_Goat wrote: ↑11 May 2026 07:35 amNo.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑11 May 2026 06:06 am Who thinks he gets traded?
I dont believe he will but if he does I could see Carolina and Florida as good fits.
What could then return be?
We now have him on a one-year contract. He's an experienced proven big-game goalie. We now have a good tandem. IF the Blues appear to not be realistically in the run for the Cup next Spring, then trade him to a desperate contender at the Deadline and get as much as you can....And then re-sign him as a UFA in the Summer for a lesser salary as discussed before. Let him know ahead of time what the intention is. He is not dumb, he knows he needs to share the time with a likely lesser amount of play. He also knows that could extend his career, so more time at lesser $ = less time at more $.
And don't forget there is always a possibility of injury to Hofer. Whom do you turn to then if you trade him now??
It's not like the Blues are intentionally trying to lose for a rebuild, with no hope for Binnington to ever be part of winning again. Binnington is valuable for many intangible reasons as well. Being here for a few more years is a good fit for him and for the Blues.
The other consideration — off rink:
Does JB and his wife like living in STL? They now have a baby and suburban STL is a pretty nice place to grow a family. What’s their psyche away from hockey? I don’t get the vibe that JB likes the nightlife that much. However, his wife was (is?) an actress who was on a TV show in Canada. If she wants to further that career, a trade to Toronto makes sense. If she is “retired” as an actress, then they’re flexible on location.
But back to on-rink considerations, I think you got it. You keep JB for a strong tandem and insurance against injury to or sophomore slump from Hofer.
-
hockey jedi
- Forum User
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: 24 May 2024 17:50 pm
Re: Binner
I think he commands more value at the trade deadline than in the summer. He knows he's being phased out. Hopefully, he brings a "I'll prove them wrong" attitude and puts up some big stats making him more valuable.
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Binner
Unless he absolutely demands a trade (which I don’t think he’ll do), I think I’d rather just keep him. Hofer is going to need a decent backup with 2026-27 projected to be his first season entering the season as the projected #1.
$6M is a lot for a backup but the Blues have the cap space to do it so that’s not really an issue.
Teams tend to need 2 good goalies these days so I’d rather just keep Binner for now.
I’ll also note that both Romanov and Zherenko will be Group 6 UFAs this summer so the Blues’ goaltending depth could get really shallow really fast. That’ll play a part in what they’d want to do with Binner as well.
I’d be a lot more comfortable moving Binner if we hadn’t lost Ellis…but unfortunately, we did. :/
$6M is a lot for a backup but the Blues have the cap space to do it so that’s not really an issue.
Teams tend to need 2 good goalies these days so I’d rather just keep Binner for now.
I’ll also note that both Romanov and Zherenko will be Group 6 UFAs this summer so the Blues’ goaltending depth could get really shallow really fast. That’ll play a part in what they’d want to do with Binner as well.
I’d be a lot more comfortable moving Binner if we hadn’t lost Ellis…but unfortunately, we did. :/
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Binner
Agreed. The Blues can always move him later if they really want to. And if his trade value really is only a 2nd or 3rd rd pick (and I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with that after the poor season he just had), then why trade him? It’d cost at least that much to then replace him.hockey jedi wrote: ↑11 May 2026 09:15 am I think he commands more value at the trade deadline than in the summer. He knows he's being phased out. Hopefully, he brings a "I'll prove them wrong" attitude and puts up some big stats making him more valuable.
-
Pierre McGuire
- Forum User
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Binner
His call…if he wants a shot at another cup somewhere than move him. If he wants to retire a Blue, then im good with that as well.
-
Bacchk29
- Forum User
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: 29 Apr 2019 07:24 am
Re: Binner
I’ll take whatever to dump the salary. Part of a plan to use cap space to speed the re tool up.
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm