STL City 1 FC Dallas 1.

Join the conversation as we discuss St. Louis City SC and other soccer topics.

Moderator: STLtoday Forum Moderators

Forum rules
winonsports
Forum User
Posts: 2686
Joined: 26 Jun 2024 12:49 pm

Re: STL City 1 FC Dallas 1.

Post by winonsports »

mjg wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 10:03 am Being purposely obtuse is no way to go through life.
https://share.google/TcfiTnr4u25pY9BPQ

You have no one to blame but yourself
Top
Rosthol
Forum User
Posts: 11247
Joined: 01 Jun 2018 16:10 pm

Re: STL City 1 FC Dallas 1.

Post by Rosthol »

mjg has left the building!
Top
mjg
Forum User
Posts: 81
Joined: 12 Jun 2024 11:32 am

Re: STL City 1 FC Dallas 1.

Post by mjg »

Rosthol wrote: ↑18 Apr 2026 08:30 am
mjg wrote: ↑17 Apr 2026 09:41 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑17 Apr 2026 05:33 am
mjg wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 10:03 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 05:34 am
mjg wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026 07:59 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026 05:30 am Why wouldn’t Sargent want to come to Saint Louis?

The bigger question is did City even try to sign him?

Probably not given the transfer fee of 22 million dollars which may go up to 27 million.

He would have filled a glaring need for this team.
Why are long pants long...all great questions (sarcasm)
Still disappointing from City.
Being purposely obtuse is no way to go through life.
How am I being purposely obtuse?

You aren’t disappointed in City not trying to sign Josh Sargent?
No, because it was never a realistic expectation. Again, I think a basic understanding of 'discovery rights' would prove beneficial
Why wasn't it a realistic expectation?


Because CKB doesn’t want to spend the money?
I’ll leave the assumptions to you. Based on prior transfer history and spending it would be foolhardy to think such a signing as being plausible.
Top
Rosthol
Forum User
Posts: 11247
Joined: 01 Jun 2018 16:10 pm

Re: STL City 1 FC Dallas 1.

Post by Rosthol »

mjg wrote: ↑19 Apr 2026 18:03 pm
Rosthol wrote: ↑18 Apr 2026 08:30 am
mjg wrote: ↑17 Apr 2026 09:41 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑17 Apr 2026 05:33 am
mjg wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 10:03 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 05:34 am
mjg wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026 07:59 am
Rosthol wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026 05:30 am Why wouldn’t Sargent want to come to Saint Louis?

The bigger question is did City even try to sign him?

Probably not given the transfer fee of 22 million dollars which may go up to 27 million.

He would have filled a glaring need for this team.
Why are long pants long...all great questions (sarcasm)
Still disappointing from City.
Being purposely obtuse is no way to go through life.
How am I being purposely obtuse?

You aren’t disappointed in City not trying to sign Josh Sargent?
No, because it was never a realistic expectation. Again, I think a basic understanding of 'discovery rights' would prove beneficial
Why wasn't it a realistic expectation?


Because CKB doesn’t want to spend the money?
I’ll leave the assumptions to you. Based on prior transfer history and spending it would be foolhardy to think such a signing as being plausible.
So CKB doesn’t want to spend the money.

Why bother pick him as a Discovery player then.

Except to have a $500,000 to $750,000 payday?
Top

Return to “Soccer Talk”