link?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
New Top 30 prospects out
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
--
Last edited by craviduce on 04 Mar 2026 19:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/cardinals/82birds wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:52 pmlink?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
it's the new Top 30 list for Preseason 2026 from mlbpipeline/mlb.com
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
thx Ducecraviduce wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 19:15 pmhttps://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/cardinals/82birds wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 17:52 pmlink?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
it's the new Top 30 list for Preseason 2026 from mlbpipeline/mlb.com
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
Appreciate the thread.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
I was going to also reference the new top 30 list - but you beat me to it.
Let's take this in a slightly different direction.
Cijntje #5.
Clarke #9.
Fajardo #13.
Three of the top 15 now ranked in the system - and each with at least one significant red flag - were acquired in the Gray, Contreras, and Donovan trades.
Not one of the acquisitions remotely close to the top 3 of Wetherholt, Doyle, and Rodrigues - there is a significant drop off after that.
That is an extremely paltry return considering that stated goal of restocking and increasing the quality of the minor league prospect pool.
STL already had 12 of the current top 15 on hand - making it impossible to realistically claim the system has been improved all that much.
It is true that Bloom correctly and wisely added much needed depth to the MLB rotation depth in Fitts and Dobbins.
But he significantly underperformed in his claimed objective to add high end prospect talent.
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
I might add Mel, why didn’t he include some of our redundant players in those trades to increase the return? Add a catcher to one trade, a lefty starter in another?Melville wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:40 pmAppreciate the thread.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
I was going to also reference the new top 30 list - but you beat me to it.
Let's take this in a slightly different direction.
Cijntje #5.
Clarke #9.
Fajardo #13.
Three of the top 15 now ranked in the system - and each with at least one significant red flag - were acquired in the Gray, Contreras, and Donovan trades.
Not one of the acquisitions remotely close to the top 3 of Wetherholt, Doyle, and Rodrigues - there is a significant drop off after that.
That is an extremely paltry return considering that stated goal of restocking and increasing the quality of the minor league prospect pool.
STL already had 12 of the current top 15 on hand - making it impossible to realistically claim the system has been improved all that much.
It is true that Bloom correctly and wisely added much needed depth to the MLB rotation depth in Fitts and Dobbins.
But he significantly underperformed in his claimed objective to add high end prospect talent.
Many on here will argue, even vehemently i might say, that Bloom did really well. But to me and some others, he got a few possibilities, but mostly all he did was reduce the payroll, and that it is what he was brought in to do!
-
hugeCardfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
Not willing to blame Flores for all of that. Our total lack of development shares significant responsibility for that.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:01 pmIts weird how we often heard what a genius Flores was at scouting and drafting, and yet there was so relatively little successful progression into stars or even high producers for several years now.craviduce wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:07 pmhe was overmatched, along with the rest of the hitting draft class in Palm Beach late last year. Those 18 and 19yo wild hurlers baffled the young birds.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:03 pm Also, the Cardinals #3 pick from last year (Gurevitch) is down to #30.
That being said, I think they all repeat PMB, and I think they'll hit better this time around....they can't get any worse. The K rates those kids racked up were disturbing. Moving on Flores was good, but his scouting crew needed to go with him.
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
Luhnow was great at drafting, but lousy at development. When he focused on scouting and drafting and left development to others, he was much more successful.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 16:01 pmIts weird how we often heard what a genius Flores was at scouting and drafting, and yet there was so relatively little successful progression into stars or even high producers for several years now.craviduce wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:07 pmhe was overmatched, along with the rest of the hitting draft class in Palm Beach late last year. Those 18 and 19yo wild hurlers baffled the young birds.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 15:03 pm Also, the Cardinals #3 pick from last year (Gurevitch) is down to #30.
That being said, I think they all repeat PMB, and I think they'll hit better this time around....they can't get any worse. The K rates those kids racked up were disturbing. Moving on Flores was good, but his scouting crew needed to go with him.
Re: New Top 30 prospects out
I agree. He ending up going after quantity, not elite quality. And maybe we weren't going to get elite for the trades we Did make, but if you start by identifying the prospects you need (Wainwright, Renteria - not a prospect but a budding young star), then ask what it takes and trade out of our own quantity that elite player.Melville wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 21:40 pmAppreciate the thread.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Mar 2026 14:38 pm Some notables:
Roby is still ranked 10 but won't pitch at all this year. Odd.
Big drop for Hence to #15, and it mentions they will probably want him in the pen.
Blaze Jordan is only #27. Some were led to believe he'd be one of our next sluggers when he was acquired. Looks more like another whiff.
Lo is the highest of our trade acquisitions at 5. I wish we would see more of him in ST.
RaRod at 3 is now well ahead of Crooks and Bernal, really wonder if they shouldn't be labeled expendable. (otherwise, why isn't one of them truly in the running for starting C this year over Pages?)
I was going to also reference the new top 30 list - but you beat me to it.
Let's take this in a slightly different direction.
Cijntje #5.
Clarke #9.
Fajardo #13.
Three of the top 15 now ranked in the system - and each with at least one significant red flag - were acquired in the Gray, Contreras, and Donovan trades.
Not one of the acquisitions remotely close to the top 3 of Wetherholt, Doyle, and Rodrigues - there is a significant drop off after that.
That is an extremely paltry return considering that stated goal of restocking and increasing the quality of the minor league prospect pool.
STL already had 12 of the current top 15 on hand - making it impossible to realistically claim the system has been improved all that much.
It is true that Bloom correctly and wisely added much needed depth to the MLB rotation depth in Fitts and Dobbins.
But he significantly underperformed in his claimed objective to add high end prospect talent.